Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM MQ vs Software AG Apama comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM MQ
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
161
Ranking in other categories
Business Activity Monitoring (1st), Message Queue (MQ) Software (1st), Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (1st)
Software AG Apama
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
CEP (1st), Streaming Analytics (21st)
 

Mindshare comparison

IBM MQ and Software AG Apama aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. IBM MQ is designed for Message Queue (MQ) Software and holds a mindshare of 29.2%, up 26.4% compared to last year.
Software AG Apama, on the other hand, focuses on CEP, holds 27.3% mindshare, up 20.7% since last year.
Message Queue (MQ) Software
CEP
 

Featured Reviews

SelvaKumar4 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 22, 2024
Offers the ability to batch metadata transfers between systems that support MQ as the communication method
I use MQ MFT for asynchronous communication – file and message transfers. I also frequently use IBM MQ for its queuing mechanisms and queue management IBM MQ is good for system integration within our organization.  If we need to do batch metadata transfers – involving APIs and MQ – we can do that…
SP
Oct 25, 2023
A tool to send out promotional notifications that need to improve areas, like deployment and maintenance
Software AG Apama should support offline scenarios as it may not always be possible to stay connected with the cloud. The solution should be deployed on an on-premises model, and it should be able to handle offline scenarios. If certain rules are set in Software AG Apama, then it should be able to execute them without being connected to an open internet source. With Software AG Apama, one may face challenges since it is difficult to find people with the right skill set to operate it. The solution also makes use of a proprietary programming language that is hard to trace in the market. It is better to go with the new options available in the market since Software AG Apama has become an old product. The ease of development and maintenance should be enhanced, but it is difficult due to the use of the proprietary programming language in the product.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's highly scalable. It provides various ways to establish high availability and workloads. E.g., you can spread workloads inside of your clusters."
"It runs everywhere, from the mainframe in the US to the PCs in the Gobi desert attached to an analog modem."
"We use queue managers/concentrators for message flow going upstream and downstream on applications with enterprise licenses."
"The MQ protocol is widely used across multiple applications and it's so simple for connectivity."
"The solution is very easy to work with."
"IBM is still adding some features and coding some other systems on the security end. However, it has the most security features I've seen in a communication solution. Security is the most important thing for our purposes."
"The solution is very stable."
"The usability of the solution is very good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability that it provides its users to handle different kinds of rules."
 

Cons

"I have used the support from IBM MQ. There is some room for improvement."
"IBM MQ's pricing is higher than its competitors'."
"There could be a better front-end GUI interface for us, where we can see things more easily."
"The installation of product upgrades and patches is very difficult. It requires the use of the IBM Installation Manager (IM)."
"In IBM MQ, the channel connection is an area where my company faces some limitations. At times, we hit limitations on the connection, meaning the connection is fully occupied."
"What could be improved is the high-availability. The way MQ works is that it separates the high-availability from the workload balance. The scalability should be easier. If something happens so that the messages are not available on each node, scalability is only possible for the workload balance."
"We need to have a better administration console and better monitoring features. Right now, they are not good and could be a lot better."
"The tool is expensive."
"The ease of development and maintenance should be enhanced, but it is difficult due to the use of the proprietary programming language in the product."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is high."
"Licensing for this software is on a yearly basis. The standard fee includes the maintenance and updates that are released periodically."
"The solution costs are high, it is going to cost a fair bit for annual operating costs and support."
"The licensing fees are paid quarterly and they are expensive."
"It's a very expensive product."
"It would be a 10 out of 10 if it wasn't so expensive."
"It is a very expensive product compared to the open source products in the market."
"Pricing could be better, as with all IBM products. But their performance in production, along with security and scalability, will pay returns in the long run."
"A commercial license is required to operate Software AG Apama."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
38%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
4%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is MQ software?
Hi As someone with 45+ years of experience in the Transaction and Message Processing world, I have seen many "MQ" solutions that have come into the market place. From my perspective, while each pro...
What are the differences between Apache Kafka and IBM MQ?
Apache Kafka is open source and can be used for free. It has very good log management and has a way to store the data used for analytics. Apache Kafka is very good if you have a high number of user...
How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?
IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...
What do you like most about Software AG Apama?
The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability that it provides its users to handle different kinds of rules.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Software AG Apama?
A commercial license is required to operate Software AG Apama.
What needs improvement with Software AG Apama?
Software AG Apama should support offline scenarios as it may not always be possible to stay connected with the cloud. The solution should be deployed on an on-premises model, and it should be able ...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

WebSphere MQ
Progress Apama
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Deutsche Bahn, Bon-Ton, WestJet, ARBURG, Northern Territory Government, Tata Steel Europe, Sharp Corporation
Okasan Online Securities
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Salesforce and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.