Sep 04, 2023
The choice depends on your use case.
IBM MQ and Apache Kafka compete in the realm of data transfer and message queue management. IBM MQ may have the upper hand due to its robust stability and guaranteed delivery features, while Apache Kafka excels in managing large scale distributed messaging, making it suitable for real-time data processing and scalability.
Features: IBM MQ is known for its stability, offering guaranteed delivery and reliable integration across various platforms. It is highly valued for its capability to handle multiple queues and provide seamless message processing across diverse systems. Apache Kafka is praised for its replication, partitioning, and ability to handle high-volume distributed messaging efficiently, making it suitable for real-time processing and easily integrating with systems like Apache Spark.
Room for Improvement: IBM MQ users seek improvements in enhanced security, a more user-friendly interface, and better authentication features. Queue management visibility is also a concern. For Apache Kafka, UI and setup complexities are areas for improvement. Simplifying scaling and reducing dependency on ZooKeeper, along with better monitoring tools, are often mentioned by users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM MQ is often deployed on-premises, and users generally report good technical support from IBM. However, service dynamics can sometimes be slow. Apache Kafka's deployment benefits from its open-source nature, providing flexibility and cost-efficiency, although it relies heavily on community support and third-party tools for assistance, making direct customer service less straightforward.
Pricing and ROI: IBM MQ involves higher licensing costs, which are justified by large enterprises due to its reliability. The perceived ROI stems from its long-term stability and reduced debugging needs. Apache Kafka is open-source and usually free, offering financial flexibility, particularly for startups that require cost-efficient data processing solutions without significant initial investment.
There is plenty of community support available online.
The Apache community provides support for the open-source version.
I would rate technical support as an eight.
Customers have not faced issues with user growth or data streaming needs.
IBM MQ handles many thousands of messages in a second, indicating good scalability.
Apache Kafka is stable.
We have never had any downtime or crashes since it's been running.
The performance angle is critical, and while it works in milliseconds, the goal is to move towards microseconds.
We are always trying to find the best configs, which is a challenge.
A more user-friendly interface and better management consoles with improved documentation could be beneficial.
Having a graphical user interface would improve usability.
The open-source version of Apache Kafka results in minimal costs, mainly linked to accessing documentation and limited support.
Its pricing is reasonable.
I am not exactly sure about the licensing cost compared to similar products, but I assume it is affordable since we continue to use it, and it is also used by our customers.
Apache Kafka is effective when dealing with large volumes of data flowing at high speeds, requiring real-time processing.
It allows the use of data in motion, allowing data to propagate from one source to another while it is in motion.
We have not experienced any downtime or crashes with IBM MQ.
Apache Kafka is an open-source distributed streaming platform that serves as a central hub for handling real-time data streams. It allows efficient publishing, subscribing, and processing of data from various sources like applications, servers, and sensors.
Kafka's core benefits include high scalability for big data pipelines, fault tolerance ensuring continuous operation despite node failures, low latency for real-time applications, and decoupling of data producers from consumers.
Key features include topics for organizing data streams, producers for publishing data, consumers for subscribing to data, brokers for managing clusters, and connectors for easy integration with various data sources.
Large organizations use Kafka for real-time analytics, log aggregation, fraud detection, IoT data processing, and facilitating communication between microservices.
IBM MQ is a middleware product used to send or exchange messages across multiple platforms, including applications, systems, files, and services via MQs (messaging queues). This solution helps simplify the creation of business applications, and also makes them easier to maintain. IBM MQ is security-rich, has high performance, and provides a universal messaging backbone with robust connectivity. In addition, it also integrates easily with existing IT assets by using an SOA (service oriented architecture).
IBM MQ can be deployed:
IBM MQ supports the following APIs:
IBM MQ Features
Some of the most powerful IBM MQ features include:
IBM MQ Benefits
Some of the benefits of using IBM MQ include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by IBM MQ users who are currently using the solution.
PeerSpot user Sunil S., a manager at a financial services firm, explains that they never lose messages are never lost in transit, mentioning that he can store messages and forward them as required: "Whenever payments are happening, such as incoming payments to the bank, we need to notify the customer. With MQ we can actually do that asynchronously. We don't want to notify the customer for each and every payment but, rather, more like once a day. That kind of thing can be enabled with the help of MQ."
Another PeerSpot reviewer, Luis L. who is a solutions director at Thesys Technologies, says that IBM MQ is a valuable solution and is "A stable and reliable software that offers good integration between different systems."
The head of operations at a financial services firm notes that "I have found the solution to be very robust. It has a strong reputation, is easy to use, simple to configure in our enterprise software, and supports all the protocols that we use."
In addition, a Software Engineer at a financial services firm praises the security benefits of it and states that “it has the most security features I've seen in a communication solution. Security is the most important thing for our purposes."
We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
