Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM MQ Logo

Top 10 IBM MQ Alternatives

Vendor: IBM
4.2 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
1,788 followers
Post review

Top IBM MQ Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to IBM MQ based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, ActiveMQ, and VMware Tanzu Data Solutions. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

IBM Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with IBM, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
IBM MQ Logo
IBM MQ Logo
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
4.0 out of 5
IBM MQ prioritizes reliable data transfer with guaranteed delivery, ideal for sensitive sectors like finance. In comparison, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers versatile API management and extensive connectors, fitting enterprises requiring broad integration. Both platforms provide strong ROI, each focusing on their core strengths.
Download IBM MQ vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report
IBM MQ's setup cost is known for its complexity and potentially higher upfront expenses, whereas MuleSoft Anypoint Platform generally offers a more cost-effective and straightforward initial setup. This highlights a key difference in their pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM MQ's setup cost is known for its complexity and potentially higher upfront expenses, whereas MuleSoft Anypoint Platform generally offers a more cost-effective and straightforward initial setup. This highlights a key difference in their pricing structures.
IBM MQ Logo
ActiveMQ
3.9 out of 5
IBM MQ Logo
ActiveMQ
3.9 out of 5

Apache ActiveMQ is the most popular and powerful open source messaging and Integration Patterns server.

Download ActiveMQ vs. IBM MQ Report
I think the software is free.
It’s open source, ergo free.
View comparison
Pricing
I think the software is free.
It’s open source, ergo free.
IBM MQ Logo
IBM MQ Logo
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions
4.0 out of 5
IBM MQ excels in complex networking with reliable message delivery and strong security, appealing to enterprises prioritizing integration and legacy systems. In comparison, VMware Tanzu Data Solutions offers flexibility and cost-effectiveness suited for modern data analytics and cloud-focused digital transformation initiatives.
Download IBM MQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report
IBM MQ has a lower initial setup cost, while VMware Tanzu Data Solutions presents higher upfront expenditures.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM MQ has a lower initial setup cost, while VMware Tanzu Data Solutions presents higher upfront expenditures.
IBM MQ Logo
Amazon SQS
4.3 out of 5
IBM MQ Logo
Amazon SQS
4.3 out of 5
IBM MQ excels in guaranteed delivery and robust architecture for data integrity across diverse platforms. In comparison, Amazon SQS offers simple integration with AWS services, ideal for those prioritizing scalability and cost-effectiveness. Tech buyers may choose IBM MQ for reliability or Amazon SQS for simplicity.
Download Amazon SQS vs. IBM MQ Report
IBM MQ involves higher initial setup costs due to its robust features, while Amazon SQS offers a more cost-effective setup with its pay-as-you-go pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM MQ involves higher initial setup costs due to its robust features, while Amazon SQS offers a more cost-effective setup with its pay-as-you-go pricing model.
IBM MQ Logo
Red Hat AMQ
4.0 out of 5
IBM MQ Logo
Red Hat AMQ
4.0 out of 5
IBM MQ is valued for handling large data with guaranteed delivery and stability, integrated easily but at a higher cost. In comparison, Red Hat AMQ offers high scalability and performance at lower prices, appealing to those preferring flexibility and open-source solutions.
Download IBM MQ vs. Red Hat AMQ Report
IBM MQ's setup costs are generally higher, reflecting its robust infrastructure and extensive support, while Red Hat AMQ offers a more cost-effective implementation ideal for those prioritizing budget over comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM MQ's setup costs are generally higher, reflecting its robust infrastructure and extensive support, while Red Hat AMQ offers a more cost-effective implementation ideal for those prioritizing budget over comprehensive features.
IBM MQ Logo
PubSub+ Platform
4.3 out of 5
IBM MQ Logo
PubSub+ Platform
4.3 out of 5
IBM MQ focuses on reliability and guaranteed message delivery for enterprises needing robust transaction processing. In comparison, PubSub+ Platform supports real-time data streaming and event-driven architectures, appealing to businesses seeking flexible protocol support and dynamic event mesh capabilities.
Download IBM MQ vs. PubSub+ Platform Report
IBM MQ's setup cost is significant and may require considerable initial investment, while PubSub+ Platform offers a more budget-friendly setup, attracting cost-sensitive businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM MQ's setup cost is significant and may require considerable initial investment, while PubSub+ Platform offers a more budget-friendly setup, attracting cost-sensitive businesses.
IBM MQ Logo
Amazon MQ
4.1 out of 5
IBM MQ Logo
Amazon MQ
4.1 out of 5
IBM MQ excels in robust integration and security, ideal for complex applications. In comparison, Amazon MQ offers a managed service with cloud-native features, enhancing flexibility. IBM MQ suits reliability-focused environments, whereas Amazon MQ's pay-as-you-go model favors scalable, cost-effective deployments.
Download Amazon MQ vs. IBM MQ Report
IBM MQ setup costs can be significant due to infrastructure requirements, while Amazon MQ offers comparatively lower setup expenses with its managed service model.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM MQ setup costs can be significant due to infrastructure requirements, while Amazon MQ offers comparatively lower setup expenses with its managed service model.
IBM MQ Logo
IBM MQ Logo
Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service
1 out of 5
Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service delivers the power of Kafka as a managed streaming data platform integrated into the Oracle Cloud ecosystem. Create Topics and start streaming or manage and deploy your own Dedicated Kafka Cluster with Elastic Scalability.
View comparison
IBM MQ Logo
Aurea CX Messenger
4.5 out of 5
IBM MQ Logo
Aurea CX Messenger
4.5 out of 5
IBM MQ offers stability, guaranteed message delivery, and broad platform integration, appealing to enterprises despite its cost. In comparison, Aurea CX Messenger provides scalability and protocol adaptability, making it suitable for environments requiring rapid scaling and efficient protocol integration.
Download Aurea CX Messenger vs. IBM MQ Report
IBM MQ has a higher setup cost compared to Aurea CX Messenger, which offers more budget-friendly options.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM MQ has a higher setup cost compared to Aurea CX Messenger, which offers more budget-friendly options.
IBM MQ Logo
Memphis
1 out of 5
IBM MQ Logo
Memphis
1 out of 5

Reduce your dev time with building event-driven apps by 90% compared to other MQs like Kafka, and RabbitMQ. A messaging platform, crafted to eliminate the heavy-lifting from Data Engineers and Developers.

View comparison
IBM MQ Logo
IBM MQ Logo
Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS
4.0 out of 5

To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

View comparison

Related categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software
Business Activity Monitoring
Message Oriented Middleware (MOM)