IBM Platform Computing LSF vs IBM PowerHA System Mirror comparison

IBM Platform Computing LSF and IBM PowerHA System Mirror are both solutions in the High Availability Clustering category. IBM Platform Computing LSF is ranked #7, while IBM PowerHA System Mirror is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.0. IBM Platform Computing LSF holds a 1.5% mindshare in HAC, compared to IBM PowerHA System Mirror’s 12.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM PowerHA System Mirror users are willing to recommend the solution.

IBM Platform Computing LSF

Read 1 IBM Platform Computing LSF review

57 Views
25 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

IBM PowerHA System Mirror

Read 2 IBM PowerHA System Mirror reviews

321 Views
204 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Platform Computing LSF

IBM PowerHA System Mirror

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Platform Computing LSF and IBM PowerHA System Mirror based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Veritas and others in High Availability Clustering.

To learn more, read our detailed High Availability Clustering Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

High Availability Clustering

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

IBM Platform Computing LSF

Ranking in High Availability Clustering

7th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM PowerHA System Mirror

Ranking in High Availability Clustering

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the High Availability Clustering category, the mindshare of IBM Platform Computing LSF is 1.5%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM PowerHA System Mirror is 12.9%, down from 13.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

High Availability Clustering

Featured Reviews

it_user371841

System Administratora at Xilinx

I think the most valuable feature is the service-level agreement.

I think the most valuable feature is the service-level agreement It's made us operate our business more efficiently. We're able to function with greater cost efficiently utilization of IT resources. Intensive testing is required before version/product release as there are many bugs and other…

Read full review

Md Al-Amin

Senior System Analyst at Thakral

Robust, reliable, and will give a big ROI over time

I primarily use this solution as a database server The most valuable features are that it's robust and reliable and that the CP memory can be updated in runtime. The initial setup could be simpler. The stability is good enough, and the product works fine. The scalability is very high and can…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM PowerHA System Mirror?

IBM PowerHA offers multiple editions. You can choose between the base, enterprise, or standard edition. If you intend to use it for purposes other than just ratio and not for HDR, and if you requir...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM PowerHA System Mirror?

In terms of interoperability and compatibility, every time new applications and database levels are released, a thorough compatibility check is conducted in PowerHA. IBM consistently ensures compat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM PowerHA System Mirror?

We use IBM PowerHA SystemMirror for high availability and VM protection. It covers scenarios like local node failures or even outages across entire sites. Additionally, it can manage workloads runn...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Veritas InfoScale Availability vs IBM PowerHA System Mirror

Compared 58% of the time

Windows Server Failover Clustering vs IBM PowerHA System Mirror

Compared 42% of the time

More IBM PowerHA System Mirror Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

High Availability Clustering

November 2024

Download IBM Platform Computing LSF product report

Buyer's Guide

High Availability Clustering

November 2024

Download IBM PowerHA System Mirror product report

Also Known As

Platform Computing LSF

PowerHA System Mirror

Learn More

IBM

Overview

IBM Platform LSF is a powerful workload management platform for demanding, distributed HPC environments. It provides a comprehensive set of intelligent, policy-driven scheduling features that enable you to utilize all of your compute infrastructure resources and ensure optimal application performance.

IBM PowerHA technology provides high availability, business continuity and disaster recovery. It enables you to deploy an HA solution that addresses both storage and high availability requirements with one integrated configuration, which offers robust performance along with a simplified user interface. Power Systems is committed to investing in - and bringing to market - solutions designed to keep your IT environments resilient. IBM engineers work continuously to optimize IBM Power Systems hardware and operating systems to keep pace with the increasing demand for 24x365 availability.

Sample Customers

Cypress Semiconductor, Platform RTM, HPC, Genomic, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, A*STAR

Royal Arctic Line, Wªrth Group, Balluff, Al Mansour Holding Company, Baptist Health of Northeast Florida, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising, SAIC FIAT Powertrain Hongyan, Vishay

Buyer's Guide

High Availability Clustering

November 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Veritas and others in High Availability Clustering. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best High Availability Clustering vendors.

We monitor all High Availability Clustering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.