Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs Postman comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Test Workbench
Ranking in API Testing Tools
12th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Performance Testing Tools (18th), Test Automation Tools (34th)
Postman
Ranking in API Testing Tools
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
API Management (12th), API Monitoring Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the API Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Rational Test Workbench is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Postman is 19.0%, down from 26.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

JP
Mar 14, 2021
Good reporting and interface, but supports limited types of protocols and requires low-level script editing
It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script.
Raghvendra Jyothi - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 17, 2022
Reliable and easy to expand with a helpful API network
I am working for an insurance firm, a big client in the USA. They wanted to upgrade the current technology with something new. However, they have legacy applications, and they don't want to handle APIs. They didn't want anything to hit their existing API since they have two layers of APIs.  At the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This solution provides for API testing, functional UI testing, performance testing, and service virtualization."
"Reporting is pretty good. Its interface is also good. I'm overall pretty happy with the functionality and use of IBM Rational Test Workbench."
"The most valuable feature of Postman is the verification and testing of APIs."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is Collections."
"In Postman, we have an option to directly import a call, make it a Postman collection, and execute it in a batch. This feature is very useful. It saves a lot of time. The manual effort is also reduced when we can just pick it in a Postman collection and then run and execute it to get the results."
"It is a scalable solution."
"It is nice to have different workspaces. You have your personal workspace, and then you have a team workspace. In general, I like its UI. It is quite cool."
"We can also submit requests multiple times and it allows us to capture the response each time by using utility scripts."
"I have enjoyed using parameters and setting parameters while powering directly."
"The interface and the different types of API methods you can use are the most valuable aspects of this solution."
 

Cons

"It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script."
"There are a number of things that they can do to simplify the tools, but the most important thing that they need to do is simplify the installation."
"Multi-part requests should be handled in the octet-stream."
"I would like to see more integrations with other platforms."
"Should have a more improved easy-to-use interface."
"The solution can be improved by providing detailed error logs including the line the error took place to make it easier to correct."
"The tool needs to have a reporting feature."
"We'd like to see videos or user-friendly reference documentation to help us figure out the solution or troubleshoot issues on our own."
"UI testing needs to be added to the solution."
"An area that needs some improvement would be to allow multiple windows with different collections to be open at the same time."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It doesn't really concern me. Licensing is on a yearly basis."
"The pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it is really good."
"Postman is a free service."
"I rate the product's price a nine or ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive. Postman is an expensive tool for Turkey."
"I rate the price of Postman a four out of five."
"This solution offers a free version."
"I use the tool's free version."
"We are using its free version."
"The solution is open-source and free."
"This tool is open-source and free to download and use."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
11%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?
Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...
What do you like most about Postman?
The product is easy to implement.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Postman?
Postman is economical and is considered to be rather cheap compared to other software solutions.
 

Also Known As

Rational Test Workbench, IBM Rational Performance Tester, IBM Functional Tester, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Financial Insurance Management Corp.
PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, Coursera
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Postman and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.