Parasoft SOAtest vs Postman comparison

Read 56 Postman reviews

8,827 Views
7,042 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and Postman are both prominent tools in the API testing market. Postman seems to have the upper hand due to its superior features and flexibility, despite Parasoft SOAtest's advantages in pricing and support.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest is praised for its comprehensive test automation, extensive protocol support, and strong integration with development workflows. Postman is appreciated for its intuitive approach to API testing, ease of use, and powerful collaboration features. Users find Postman's versatility and extensive library of pre-built APIs advantageous.

Room for Improvement: Users note that Parasoft SOAtest could improve by offering more user-friendly interfaces, better documentation, and enhanced usability. Postman users suggest enhancements in load testing capabilities, integrations with more CI/CD tools, and better technical functionalities for advanced testing needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest users appreciate the tool’s robust deployment models and responsive customer service, though they note a steep learning curve. Postman is recognized for smooth deployment and an abundance of user resources, though its customer service is noted to be less responsive than Parasoft.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is considered to have a higher initial setup cost, but users find its long-term ROI justifiable due to its comprehensive capabilities. Postman offers a more affordable setup cost and quick returns through its scalable pricing model, highlighting its cost efficiency and quick time to value.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. Postman Report (Updated: October 2024).

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Postman

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in API Testing Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (31st), Functional Testing Tools (23rd), Test Automation Tools (23rd)

Postman

Ranking in API Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Management (12th), API Monitoring Software (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the API Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 1.6%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Postman is 19.0%, down from 26.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Ajit Kumar Rout

Sr Quality Assurance Engineer at Wabtec Industrial

Aug 6, 2021

Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved

In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing. Automated testing is also good but requires some knowledge in that field. It has some great features. It's a good tool compared to some of the other paid tools; input and output can be stored before extension and there is also a verification assessment that can be implemented by using some different methodologies inside the tool. If the licensing cost is suitable then I recommend this solution. If you have automation people with in-depth knowledge in coding that will be helpful. I rate this solution a seven out of 10.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Dec 17, 2022

Reliable and easy to expand with a helpful API network

I am working for an insurance firm, a big client in the USA. They wanted to upgrade the current technology with something new. However, they have legacy applications, and they don't want to handle APIs. They didn't want anything to hit their existing API since they have two layers of APIs. At the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

"The solution is scalable."

"We have seen a return on investment."

"We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product."

"Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports."

"Automatic testing is the most valuable feature."

"Technical support is helpful."

"Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

"Postman allows you to incorporate and export the test cases we create. It enables me to share the test cases with my colleagues, so I don't have to copy them into an Excel sheet. Postman lets me export the dataset and share it with my team. They can use my test case for their testing."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is Collections."

"The interface and the different types of API methods you can use are the most valuable aspects of this solution."

"The most valuable feature of Postman is the verification and testing of APIs."

"It is a very stable solution."

"In Postman, we have an option to directly import a call, make it a Postman collection, and execute it in a batch. This feature is very useful. It saves a lot of time. The manual effort is also reduced when we can just pick it in a Postman collection and then run and execute it to get the results."

"I recommend Postman for all business types."

"It's user-friendly. Anybody can learn it within five to seven minutes."

Cons

"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

"Reporting facilities can be better."

"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."

"The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually."

"Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings."

"Enabling/disabling an optional element of an XML request is only possible if a data source (e.g., Excel sheet) is connected to the test. Otherwise, the option is not available at all in the drop-down menu."

"During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time."

"The summary reports could be improved."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

"Postman needs more advanced data-driven testing."

"Something that could be better is the inclusion of another type of test, for example, end-to-end tests."

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

"Postman needs to improve its support for a lot of integrations."

"I was not even aware that it was possible to automate tasks in Postman...Some features related to the automation of tasks need to be added to the solution."

"I would like that if you click on one of the fields you should be able to see the entire row of fields, names, and values."

"It should be able to check the records and compare them to the regression testing more on the automation side."

"UI testing needs to be added to the solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"This is an open source solution."

"The solution has a licensing fee which might be prohibitive."

"I rate the product's price a nine or ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive. Postman is an expensive tool for Turkey."

"I use the tool's free version."

"We do not pay any money for Postman."

"The solution is open-source and free."

"The solution is free for individuals, but for companies that use it across the organization, you have to pay per user."

"I rate the price of Postman a four out of five."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?

Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

The price is average. It isn't overly expensive.

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings. Going through that is a challenge. It only happens in the initial stage when we are setting up the tool, but it can be imp...

How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?

Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...

What do you like most about Postman?

The product is easy to implement.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Postman?

Postman is economical and is considered to be rather cheap compared to other software solutions.

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest

Comparisons

Compared 19% of the time

Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 13% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 6% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

ReadyAPI Test vs Postman

Compared 28% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Postman

Compared 21% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Postman

Compared 14% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Postman

Compared 13% of the time

Apigee vs Postman

Compared 5% of the time

Product Reports

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Parasoft SOAtest

November 2024

Download Postman product report

November 2024

Also Known As

SOAtest

No data available

Learn More

Parasoft

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Postman's Tools Support Every Stage of the API Lifecycle. Through design, testing and full production, Postman is there for faster, easier API development - without the chaos.

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, Coursera