Parasoft SOAtest Reviews

Organizations reported a high ROI with Parasoft SOAtest, highlighting simplified API and web services testing without extensive coding. Satisfaction levels reached over 95%, and it was noted to reduce manual efforts and code complexity. Users experienced efficient test pattern building for complex tests but mentioned the absence of a testing metrics system. Some believe understanding profitability requires a long-term perspective, indicating a positive direction in code implementation and complexity reduction.

Parasoft SOAtest pricing is generally viewed as expensive, with a complex licensing structure. Enterprises often utilize floating licenses, allowing broader access but adding cost. Despite its high price, users find value in its scalability and extensive features. Licensing costs can impact adoption across an organization, suggesting the need for careful consideration of use case alignment and budget. Support packages are beneficial, but organizations should evaluate whether Parasoft's capabilities justify the investment.

• "The price is around $5,000 USD."
• "They do have a confusing licensing structure."
• "The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

Parasoft SOAtest is primarily used for automated regression tests in SOA architecture, testing web services like SOAP/REST/MQ/SAP, supporting various protocols and languages. It facilitates integration, API, and end-to-end testing for numerous applications utilizing Jenkins for scheduling. Organizations leverage it for banking, REST architecture, driver and firmware SQA, automotive compliance, and quality enhancement. Companies emphasize transaction handling with message protocols and utilize its seamless integration features for API and middleware testing.

Customer service and support for Parasoft SOAtest is generally rated as good to excellent. Users appreciate swift responses and efficient problem resolution, although occasional delays are noted. Some users experience challenges with complex issues and knowledge gaps, but overall technical support is described as responsive and helpful, often involving direct contact with consultants. The ticketing system is effective, and support teams are described as knowledgeable. Users report a high level of customer satisfaction.

Users find Parasoft SOAtest's initial setup straightforward and quick. Installation is simple, often guided by a wizard, and requires minimal expertise. Detailed documentation assists in the testing process. Challenges arise mainly from integrating with existing systems or specific customizations. While some experience longer deployments due to complex environments, most users manage installation and configuration efficiently, benefiting from its ease of use and comprehensive features.

Users of Parasoft SOAtest noted varied scalability experiences. Some reported no issues, while others mentioned challenges with large, complex test scenarios or memory management with extensive testing. Cutting large tests into smaller ones was effective. Positive feedback highlighted its scalability across multiple applications and integration with CI/CD pipelines, utilizing it among significant numbers in QA teams. Users recognize the need to increase usage, especially on cloud platforms. Despite mixed experiences, it remains adaptable for medium to large organizations.

Parasoft SOAtest, built on Eclipse, may experience elevated memory usage, affecting performance on lower-end systems. However, many users report stability without significant issues. Sporadic concerns include occasional memory-related instability and rare software hang-ups. Parasoft support assists in resolving issues. Users often acknowledge stable performance, with some rating its stability highly. Stability concerns largely revolve around licensing rather than crashes. Efficiency is noted in controlled environments, despite isolated occurrences impacting smooth operation.