Parasoft SOAtest vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) comparison

Parasoft and Sonar are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Parasoft is ranked #31 with an average rating of 7.0, while Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. Parasoft holds a 0.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to Sonar’s 27.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Sonar users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 30 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

929 Views
577 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Read 114 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews

40,770 Views
33,449 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 30, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and SonarQube Server compete in API testing and code quality analysis, respectively. Based on user reviews, Parasoft's API testing capabilities, combined with SonarQube's strong code analysis features like quality gates, make them leaders in their categories.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest stands out for its automated web services testing, custom scripting options, and extensive protocol support. It is ideal for robust API testing and validation processes. SonarQube Server, known for its comprehensive code quality analysis, supports multiple programming languages, quality gates, and integrates seamlessly into development environments.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest can benefit from enhancing its reporting features and making them less technical, improving UI testing capabilities, and optimizing test management integration. SonarQube needs to refine its security vulnerability detection, dynamic analysis capabilities, simplify configuration, and expand documentation and language support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest is typically deployed on-premises and provides good customer support, albeit with occasional delays. SonarQube offers flexible deployment across cloud and on-premises models, with strong community support, though professional support could be enhanced for complex setups.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is considered expensive, yet users perceive it as a worthy investment due to automation and testing capabilities that justify its ROI. SonarQube provides competitive pricing, with a free community edition offering many features, and commercial upgrades adding more value for cost-effective code quality and security focus without extensive budget constraints.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,640 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (21st), API Testing Tools (9th), Test Automation Tools (23rd)

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

114

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 27.4%, down from 28.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Ujjwal Gupta

Project Lead at Mphasis

Easy to use and understand with multiple types of testing on offer

It is very easy to understand. We can do a lot with it. Since this is a commercial tool, we can have more functionality in place. It covers more things like ADI and APIs, et cetera. Everything is in one place, right there, so you don't need to go anywhere. With one single tool, you have everything you need. You can even test the UI as well. The initial setup is very easy. There is nice functionality under the Service Virtualization feature. The solution is stable. Technical support is helpful. This product easily scales. Parasoft actually provides very extensive coverage. For example, in SAP applications, we have various EDIs, and integrated development. That also is supported by Parasoft. In the market, we don't have many of the tools there to test those things. It's nice to be able to with this product.

Read full review

Wang Dayong

Senior Software Engineering Manager at Hill

Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages

The product provides false reports sometimes. It also fails to understand the context of the code. It reports that a line of code has issues without considering its relation with the previous line. The product should improve the report quality. While it asks us to improve the code quality, it would be good if it also suggests how to improve the quality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

"We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product."

"Technical support is helpful."

"If you want something that’s not provided out of the box, then you can write it yourself and integrate it with SOAtest."

"We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios."

"We have seen a return on investment."

"Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports."

"Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

"This solution is simple to use and can be quickly deployed."

"The integrations SonarQube provides with our software delivery pipeline are very seamless."

"Can tweak rules and feed them into our build pipelines."

"Strong code evaluation for budget-minded clients."

"SonarQube has a lot of value, it reviews the basic coding standards and security vulnerabilities of code that help to reduce issues."

"It easily ties into our continuous integration pipeline."

"With SonarQube's web interface, it is easy to drill down to see the individual problems, but also to look at the project from above and get the big picture, with possible larger problem areas."

"The most valuable features are the dashboard reports and the ease of integrating it with Jenkins."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros

Cons

"Enabling/disabling an optional element of an XML request is only possible if a data source (e.g., Excel sheet) is connected to the test. Otherwise, the option is not available at all in the drop-down menu."

"The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually."

"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

"The performance could be a bit better."

"During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time."

"Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings."

"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."

"Reporting facilities can be better."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

"We're in the process of figuring out how to automate the workflow for QA audit controls on it. I think that's perhaps an area that we could use some buffing. We're a Kubernetes shop, so there are some things that aren't direct fits, which we're struggling with on the component Docker side. But nothing major."

"SonarQube can improve by scanning the internal library which currently it does not do. We are looking for a solution for this."

"Their dashboarding is very limited. They can improve their dashboards for multiple areas, such as security review, maintainability, etc. They have all this information, so they should publish all this information on the dashboard so that the users can view the summary and then analyze it further. This is something that I would like to see in the next version."

"This is a well-rounded solution, however, some features could be made available on the free version. The price of the solution could be reduced."

"I would like to see more options for security, beyond the basics like SQL injection."

"We found a solution with dynamic testing, and are looking to find a solution that can be used for both types of testing."

"SonarQube could be improved with more dynamic testing—basically, now, it's a static code analysis scan. For example, when the developer writes the code and does the corresponding unit test, he can cover functional and non-functional. So the SonarQube could be improved by helping to execute unit tests and test dynamically, using various parameters, and to help detect any vulnerabilities. Currently, it'll just give the test case and say whether it passes or fails—it won't give you any other input or dynamic testing. They could use artificial intelligence to build a feature that would help developers identify and fix issues in the early stages, which would help us deliver the product and reduce costs. Another area with room for improvement is in regard to automating things, since the process currently needs to be done manually."

"If the product could assist us with fixing issues by giving us more pointers then it would help to resolve more of the warnings without such a commitment in terms of time."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"SonarQube is a cost-effective solution."

"SonarQube is a fairly affordable solution for a larger scale if you have a specific role or specific department for secure code."

"As a user and a consumer of this solution, it can be pricey for my company to support and use, even though there are many benefits. For this reason, we use the free version. In the future, as our product cycles develop and evolve at a more steady pace, we hope to invest in the licensing for this tool."

"The beauty of this solution is the free open-source version is capable enough in doing pretty much what an enterprise-level version can do."

"We use the solution free of cost."

"This solution is free."

"The price of this solution is more expensive than competitors. However, it works better than competitors."

"The licence is standard open source licensing"

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?

Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

The price is average. It isn't overly expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings. Going through that is a challenge. It only happens in the initial stage when we are setting up the tool, but it can be imp...

See all answers

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

Comparisons

Postman vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 23% of the time

Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 13% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 7% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 14% of the time

Coverity vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 12% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 12% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 8% of the time

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

February 2025

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

January 2025

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report

Download SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

Sonar

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Parasoft

Sonar

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?

Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.

What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?

Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sonar

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

January 2025

Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.