Parasoft SOAtest vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) comparison

Parasoft and Sonar are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Parasoft is ranked #31 with an average rating of 7.0, while Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. Parasoft holds a 0.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to Sonar’s 28.7% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Sonar users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 30 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

997 Views
632 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Read 113 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews

43,809 Views
35,644 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 30, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and SonarQube Server compete in API testing and code quality analysis, respectively. Based on user reviews, Parasoft's API testing capabilities, combined with SonarQube's strong code analysis features like quality gates, make them leaders in their categories.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest stands out for its automated web services testing, custom scripting options, and extensive protocol support. It is ideal for robust API testing and validation processes. SonarQube Server, known for its comprehensive code quality analysis, supports multiple programming languages, quality gates, and integrates seamlessly into development environments.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest can benefit from enhancing its reporting features and making them less technical, improving UI testing capabilities, and optimizing test management integration. SonarQube needs to refine its security vulnerability detection, dynamic analysis capabilities, simplify configuration, and expand documentation and language support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest is typically deployed on-premises and provides good customer support, albeit with occasional delays. SonarQube offers flexible deployment across cloud and on-premises models, with strong community support, though professional support could be enhanced for complex setups.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is considered expensive, yet users perceive it as a worthy investment due to automation and testing capabilities that justify its ROI. SonarQube provides competitive pricing, with a free community edition offering many features, and commercial upgrades adding more value for cost-effective code quality and security focus without extensive budget constraints.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (22nd), API Testing Tools (9th), Test Automation Tools (23rd)

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 28.7%, up from 28.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Ajit Kumar Rout

Sr Quality Assurance Engineer at Wabtec Industrial

Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved

In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing. Automated testing is also good but requires some knowledge in that field. It has some great features. It's a good tool compared to some of the other paid tools; input and output can be stored before extension and there is also a verification assessment that can be implemented by using some different methodologies inside the tool. If the licensing cost is suitable then I recommend this solution. If you have automation people with in-depth knowledge in coding that will be helpful. I rate this solution a seven out of 10.

Read full review

Wang Dayong

Senior Software Engineering Manager at Hill

Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages

The product provides false reports sometimes. It also fails to understand the context of the code. It reports that a line of code has issues without considering its relation with the previous line. The product should improve the report quality. While it asks us to improve the code quality, it would be good if it also suggests how to improve the quality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have seen a return on investment."

"Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization."

"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."

"They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic."

"The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest."

"If you want something that’s not provided out of the box, then you can write it yourself and integrate it with SOAtest."

"We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product."

"The solution is scalable."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

"SonarQube is one of the more popular solutions because it supports 29 languages."

"The solution has a wide variety of features and an open-source community that you are able to learn Java, JavaScript, or any other programing language."

"The static code analysis is very good."

"The solution can verify vulnerabilities, code smells, and hotspots. It makes the software more secure and it helps make a junior or novice developer sharper."

"I like that it's easy to navigate not just in terms of code findings but you can actually see them in the context of your source code because it gives you a copy of your code with the items that it found and highlights them. You can see it directly in your code, so you can easily go back and make the corrections in the code. It basically finds the problems for you and tells you where they are."

"The most valuable features are the dashboard, the ability to drill down to the code, user-friendly, and the technical debt estimation."

"This solution is simple to use and can be quickly deployed."

"The good thing with SonarQube is it covers a lot of issues, it's a very robust framework."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros

Cons

"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."

"Reporting facilities can be better."

"The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually."

"UI testing should be more in-depth."

"During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time."

"The performance could be a bit better."

"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

"The summary reports could be improved."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

"I would like to see improvements in defining the quality sets of rules and the quality to ensure code with low-performance does not end up in production."

"The time it took for me to do the whole process was approximately two hours because I had to download, read the documentation, and do the configurations."

"SonarQube is not development-centric like Snyk."

"SonarQube could improve by adding automatic creation of tasks after scanning and more support for the Czech language."

"We had some issues where the Quality Gate check sometimes gets stuck and it is unclear."

"The product provides false reports sometimes."

"We could use some team support, but since we are using the community version, it's not available."

"There is need for support for the additional languages and ease of use in adding new rules for detecting issues."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"Can try developer version for 14 days on the free trial."

"Some of the plugins that were previously free are not free now."

"We're using their free Community Edition version."

"I am satisfied with the pricing."

"I do not know about the pricing as I am using the community edition, which is free. But I compared the pricing with Sigma, and it is higher than SonarQube."

"We are using the Community edition of SonarQube."

"We use the tool's community edition."

"We have a license with 125,000 lines of code. We did not purchase a lot of lines but it is specific to our code environment."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?

Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

The price is average. It isn't overly expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings. Going through that is a challenge. It only happens in the initial stage when we are setting up the tool, but it can be imp...

See all answers

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

Comparisons

Postman vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 25% of the time

Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 12% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 9% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 6% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 16% of the time

Coverity vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 12% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 12% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 9% of the time

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

December 2024

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

November 2024

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report

Download SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

Sonar

Learn More

Parasoft

Sonar

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Parasoft

Sonar

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?

Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.

What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?

Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

December 2024

Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.