Top 10 Parasoft SOAtest Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

31 reviews
92% willing to recommend

1,900 followers

Top Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Parasoft SOAtest based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One, and SmartBear TestComplete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Parasoft SOAtest surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive automated testing, service virtualization, and API security features, ensuring robust, reliable software delivery while reducing the time and effort required for complex test scenarios.

Parasoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Parasoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Tricentis Tosca

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis Tosca

4.1 out of 5

Parasoft SOAtest excels with robust test automation and ease of integration, making it ideal for diverse platform testing. In comparison, Tricentis Tosca stands out with its model-based testing for complex scenarios. Parasoft SOAtest offers simple deployment; however, Tricentis Tosca delivers long-term value despite higher costs.

Download Parasoft SOAtest vs. Tricentis Tosca Report

Pricing

Parasoft SOAtest has a higher initial setup cost compared to Tricentis Tosca, which offers a more affordable entry point.

View comparison

Pricing

Parasoft SOAtest has a higher initial setup cost compared to Tricentis Tosca, which offers a more affordable entry point.

OpenText UFT One

4.0 out of 5

OpenText UFT One

4.0 out of 5

OpenText UFT One is noted for its extensive automation capabilities and integration with development tools. In comparison, Parasoft SOAtest provides robust testing and reporting features. Tech buyers might prefer OpenText UFT One for its cost-effectiveness, while Parasoft SOAtest appeals due to its superior features in complex environments.

Download OpenText UFT One vs. Parasoft SOAtest Report

Pricing

OpenText UFT One generally incurs a higher setup cost due to its extensive feature set, while Parasoft SOAtest offers a more budget-friendly setup with a focus on essential functionalities.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText UFT One generally incurs a higher setup cost due to its extensive feature set, while Parasoft SOAtest offers a more budget-friendly setup with a focus on essential functionalities.

SmartBear TestComplete

3.8 out of 5

SmartBear TestComplete

3.8 out of 5

Parasoft SOAtest excels in API testing with extensive protocol support. In comparison, SmartBear TestComplete is ideal for multi-platform UI testing and offers flexible pricing. Each tool addresses distinct needs, making them appealing based on specific test requirements and deployment preferences.

Download Parasoft SOAtest vs. SmartBear TestComplete Report

Pricing

Parasoft SOAtest involves a substantial setup cost compared to SmartBear TestComplete, which is more cost-effective, highlighting a key pricing distinction between the two testing solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Parasoft SOAtest involves a substantial setup cost compared to SmartBear TestComplete, which is more cost-effective, highlighting a key pricing distinction between the two testing solutions.

Selenium HQ

4.0 out of 5

Selenium HQ

4.0 out of 5

Parasoft SOAtest excels in API testing with robust data-driven capabilities and extensive validation tools. In comparison, Selenium HQ offers open-source web testing with cross-browser support. Tech buyers might choose Parasoft for comprehensive features or Selenium for cost-effective, flexible solutions.

Download Parasoft SOAtest vs. Selenium HQ Report

Pricing

Parasoft SOAtest has higher initial setup costs compared to Selenium HQ, which maintains lower entry expenses, highlighting a key difference in affordability between the two software solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Parasoft SOAtest has higher initial setup costs compared to Selenium HQ, which maintains lower entry expenses, highlighting a key difference in affordability between the two software solutions.

ReadyAPI Test

4.0 out of 5

ReadyAPI Test

4.0 out of 5

Parasoft SOAtest offers a comprehensive toolset for complex test scenarios and lower cost. In comparison, ReadyAPI Test provides superior functionalities and a feature-rich environment. Parasoft SOAtest excels in automation capabilities, while ReadyAPI Test shines with intuitive design and extensive protocol compatibility.

Download Parasoft SOAtest vs. ReadyAPI Test Report

Pricing

Parasoft SOAtest has a higher setup cost compared to ReadyAPI Test, reflecting its extensive enterprise capabilities, whereas ReadyAPI Test offers a more budget-friendly setup cost catering to a broader range of users.

View comparison

Pricing

ReadyAPI

3.9 out of 5

ReadyAPI

3.9 out of 5

Parasoft SOAtest offers comprehensive API testing features like detailed validation and robust data-driven support, excelling in functionality. In comparison, ReadyAPI specializes in ease of use with rapid test creation and supports a wide range of API types, ideal for versatile environments.

Download Parasoft SOAtest vs. ReadyAPI Report

Pricing

Parasoft SOAtest has a higher setup cost than ReadyAPI, making ReadyAPI more economical for initial deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

Parasoft SOAtest has a higher setup cost than ReadyAPI, making ReadyAPI more economical for initial deployment.

OpenText UFT Developer

3.7 out of 5

OpenText UFT Developer

3.7 out of 5

Parasoft SOAtest excels at API testing and end-to-end automation with minimal scripting. In comparison, OpenText UFT Developer provides strong integration with developer environments. Tech buyers might choose Parasoft for complex scenario handling and OpenText for platform flexibility and developer-friendly coding.

Download OpenText UFT Developer vs. Parasoft SOAtest Report

Pricing

The setup cost for Parasoft SOAtest is praised for being straightforward and efficient, while OpenText UFT Developer is noted for its complexity and higher expense. Parasoft SOAtest offers a more seamless onboarding experience compared to the more intricate process of OpenText UFT Devel...

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Functional Testing Tools

API Testing Tools

Test Automation Tools