Parasoft SOAtest vs SmartBear TestComplete comparison

Parasoft and SmartBear are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Parasoft is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.0, while SmartBear is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8. Parasoft holds a 0.4% mindshare in TAt, compared to SmartBear’s 6.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 30 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

356 Views
225 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SmartBear TestComplete

Read 75 SmartBear TestComplete reviews

4,385 Views
3,228 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

SmartBear TestComplete

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and SmartBear TestComplete compete in the test automation software category. SOAtest holds an advantage in API testing capabilities, while TestComplete is more versatile for application testing.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers strong API testing support, including multiple protocol compatibility and comprehensive test automation. It provides extensive scripting and data-driven testing options, and integrates effectively with source control tools. SmartBear TestComplete provides automation features for desktop, mobile, and web applications, exceptional object recognition, and cross-platform support.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest needs a more user-friendly interface, better report functionalities, and improved UI testing. It also lacks seamless integration with some management tools. SmartBear TestComplete faces challenges with complex web and mobile testing setup, significant manual intervention, and a complicated, costly licensing model.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest is flexible with on-premises or hybrid cloud deployment options and offers effective customer service, though support varies by region. SmartBear TestComplete supports on-premises and cloud deployments, providing robust technical support with room for improvement with modern DevOps tool integration.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is positioned as a high-end market option with substantial capabilities but high licensing costs which may be prohibitive for smaller teams. SmartBear TestComplete offers a modular pricing structure which may be more affordable for diverse needs, although recent changes to its pricing model have drawn criticism. Both solutions generally deliver positive ROI, with TestComplete often viewed as more cost-effective.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. SmartBear TestComplete Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. SmartBear TestComplete

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 839,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

19th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

22nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (31st), API Testing Tools (9th)

SmartBear TestComplete

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

8th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SmartBear TestComplete is 6.0%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Ujjwal Gupta

Project Lead at Mphasis

Easy to use and understand with multiple types of testing on offer

It is very easy to understand. We can do a lot with it. Since this is a commercial tool, we can have more functionality in place. It covers more things like ADI and APIs, et cetera. Everything is in one place, right there, so you don't need to go anywhere. With one single tool, you have everything you need. You can even test the UI as well. The initial setup is very easy. There is nice functionality under the Service Virtualization feature. The solution is stable. Technical support is helpful. This product easily scales. Parasoft actually provides very extensive coverage. For example, in SAP applications, we have various EDIs, and integrated development. That also is supported by Parasoft. In the market, we don't have many of the tools there to test those things. It's nice to be able to with this product.

Read full review

Prakhar Goel

Sr Test Lead at Emerson

Used for integration automation, user-based automation, and web automation

The solution's most valuable features are the drag-and-drop feature, keyword-driven approach, and reusability of the scripts. The solution has introduced a new feature that helps us identify objects we cannot normally identify. It gives you a fair idea of objects, resolving the object recognition issue. The solution can be used to perform different tests on different machines.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios."

"Technical support is helpful."

"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."

"Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports."

"We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product."

"If you want something that’s not provided out of the box, then you can write it yourself and integrate it with SOAtest."

"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

"Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

"The solution has a very nice interface."

"Selenium integration."

"The initial setup is pretty easy and it's quick to deploy."

"The solution is mainly stable."

"Recording and playback of tests were easier with SmartBear TestComplete...It is a scalable solution."

"The solution helps improve the stability of our product. It also decreases the work of our manual quality assurance engineers."

"The most valuable feature is the integration with Azure DevOps."

"The ease-of-use and quality of the overall product are above average."

More SmartBear TestComplete pros

Cons

"UI testing should be more in-depth."

"The summary reports could be improved."

"Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings."

"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."

"Reporting facilities can be better."

"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

"Enabling/disabling an optional element of an XML request is only possible if a data source (e.g., Excel sheet) is connected to the test. Otherwise, the option is not available at all in the drop-down menu."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

"The code editor, though following eclipse-style, is still a work in progress and gives a very poorly formatted code once viewed via other editing tools."

"TestComplete gives support to do requests to a SOAP web service but has no support to do HTTP requests on Restful services."

"Error handling features in the tool are a little limited."

"During the distribution of our regression test cases, the control IDs are not always recognized correctly."

"Right now, when you buy the solution, you need to pay for one solution. You receive one set up and you install it and it's just in that one machine. It would be ideal if they could offer one subscription where you can connect to different machines with a group subscription."

"Stability issues occurred only when connecting to the SourceSafe. Sometimes, after getting the latest version, the tool hangs and it should be reopened in order to recover."

"The test object repository needs to be improved. The hierarchy and the way we identify the objects in different applications, irrespective of technology, needs adjustments. The located and test objects are not as flexible compared to other commercial tools."

"The way objects are added and used when utilizing descriptive programming could be improved. It is a little unwieldy, compared to UFT."

More SmartBear TestComplete cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"Overall, for us, the cost of the TestComplete platform and the three extra modules is around $8,000."

"The pricing is a little above average — it could be lower."

"Our ROI is about $10,000 a year."

"SmartBear TestComplete is an expensive tool."

"The price of SmartBear TestComplete could be less. The main challenge is when it comes to node-locked. They should use a subscription model, such as a monthly-based subscription or, a quarterly-based subscription. Their floating license is very expensive, and this high price should be reduced or provide, at a minimum, a subscription model."

"Buy modules on demand. If you have a four-person team and they will each automate tests only 25% of the time, it's better to buy a floating licence and share the tool during the work day."

"The option we chose was around $2,000 USD."

"The solution is around $1500. Some are perpetual licenses, and some get a yearly report card."

More SmartBear TestComplete pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?

Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

The price is average. It isn't overly expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings. Going through that is a challenge. It only happens in the initial stage when we are setting up the tool, but it can be imp...

See all answers

What do you like most about SmartBear TestComplete?

TestComplete has strong reporting capabilities. The reports they generate are really good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SmartBear TestComplete?

I don't know much about the pricing, however, I think it's cheaper.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SmartBear TestComplete?

The recording function, when using Python, could be improved, as it does not work well in recording testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Postman vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 23% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 22% of the time

Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 13% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 23% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 9% of the time

Qt Squish vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 9% of the time

More SmartBear TestComplete Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

February 2025

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

SmartBear TestComplete

February 2025

Download SmartBear TestComplete product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

No data available

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

What is SmartBear TestComplete?

TestComplete is a reliable, sturdy automated testing platform created by SmartBear Software. SmartBear Software is a worldwide technological leader known for developing quality enterprise-class development and testing solutions.

TestComplete simplifies the process of creating tests for numerous applications, including, but not limited to; Desktop, Android, IOS, Web browsers, and Windows. Application tests can be manual, scripted, and even recorded by using keyword-driven or data-driven functionality. There are even additional options for error reporting and automated playback. The object repository is extremely accurate and is fully customizable. TestComplete can easily be used by experienced developers and even by manual novice testers to develop quality automated UI tests quickly.

TestComplete offers three different testing scenarios:

Desktop: Users can easily and quickly automate UI tests using today’s most popular desktop applications, such as; Windows, Java, Python,.Net, VBScript, and more.
Web: Users can effortlessly create renewable tests for all of today’s popular web applications, including JavaScript frameworks on 2000+ trusted browser and platform integrations.
Mobile: Users can safely build and automate serviceable UI tests on actual or virtual android or IOS devices, locally or in the cloud. Users can create code or codeless tests. TestComplete seamlessly integrates with many of today’s popular frameworks.

Key Features

Easily create automated UI tests: TestComplete offers scriptless Record and Replay or simple keyword-driven tests to quickly develop any type of UI test users may require. Tests can be recorded once, then replayed when needed across various applications on mobile, web, or desktop environments. TestComplete integrates with many different languages, such as Java, Python, C+, and more.
Keyword driven tests: Users can easily divide testing steps, actions, objects, and data with an integrated keyword-driven test structure. This makes it easy for every user to participate in the test automation process; there is no programming experience needed. Everything is made simple with easy-to-use point-and-click options.
Data driven tests: Easily distinguish data from test commands to keep administrative efforts simple. Users can improve overall coverage by running various automated mobile, desktop, or web UI tests.
Record and Replay: Users can reuse created automated tests across every environment as often as desired. This helps to expand overall test coverage and represents a huge cost and time savings.

Reviews from Real Users

Sandhiya T S., Sr Solutions Engineer at Lexington Soft, relates, “The record and replay aspects of the solution are quite useful for people. With them, you don't have to write any scripts. Basically, you can record your actions and play them back later. The initial setup is also very easy.”

Sai S R., Staff Test Architect at a tech services company, says, "The most valuable features of the SmartBear TestComplete are self-healing, they reduce the maintenance required. The different languages SmartBear TestComplete supports are good because some of our libraries are written in Python, JavaScript, and C#. It's very easy to put them all under one project and use them."

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. SmartBear TestComplete

February 2025

Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. SmartBear TestComplete

Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. SmartBear TestComplete and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. SmartBear TestComplete report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.