Parasoft SOAtest and OpenText UFT Developer are popular options for robust testing solutions, with UFT Developer often considered superior due to features deemed worth the higher cost.
Features: Parasoft SOAtest allows rapid setup of functional test scenarios using WSDL or XSD, data-driven testing, and custom validations via scripting. It supports various protocols and offers virtualization capabilities, simplifying complex system testing and aiding continuous testing. OpenText UFT Developer enables framework coding in C# and Java, supports multi-protocol testing, including desktop and SAP applications, and integrates smoothly with ALM for efficient test management.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could improve its user-friendliness by refining report outputs and memory management. Users face challenges with data source integration and workspace stability. OpenText UFT Developer needs to enhance cost-efficiency and test execution speed, with consumer concerns about complex licensing and its high expense.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest is mainly available on-premises, potentially limiting flexibility compared to OpenText UFT Developer's support for both on-premises and cloud environments. Both offer strong customer service, though Parasoft SOAtest's support could improve in response times and regional availability, while OpenText users report satisfaction with support responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: Both products are regarded as costly. Parasoft SOAtest's comprehensive feature set suggests a decent ROI, while users perceive OpenText UFT Developer as more expensive, influenced by various licensing models that affect organizational commitment. Despite costs, its integration and scripting capabilities are valued.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
