SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT Developer are competitors in the software testing tools category. Users find TestComplete to have an advantage due to its cost-effectiveness and flexible pricing models, whereas UFT Developer is appreciated for its sophisticated functionality, making it well-suited for organizations desiring comprehensive testing capabilities despite its higher cost.
Features: TestComplete's Object Browser is a standout feature with efficient object management, and it offers dynamic methods like FindChild for automation across desktop, mobile, and web applications. Its seamless integration with external tools augments its functionality. UFT Developer, on the other hand, excels in modern testing protocol support, providing effortless integration with development environments such as Eclipse and Visual Studio, which is beneficial for complex testing requirements.
Room for Improvement: TestComplete's web and mobile testing frameworks present challenges in dynamic object capturing and Intellisense functionality, and it faces licensing issues on virtual machines alongside limits in version control integration. UFT Developer's higher price and limited environment-specific features draw criticism, particularly when compared with evolving tools, highlighting the need for better scripting support and ease of use for less technical users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer on-premises and public cloud deployments. However, TestComplete edges out with more responsive and comprehensive customer service, bolstered by active community forums, while UFT Developer's support, though satisfactory, is seen as less efficient in timely solution provision.
Pricing and ROI: TestComplete is viewed favorably in terms of value with its diverse licensing options that suit various organizational needs. Its pricing flexibility and module-based purchases are conducive to cost savings for smaller teams. UFT Developer, while efficient, features a higher cost, making it less accessible to smaller budgets but worthwhile due to its strong integration capabilities and robust performance for some enterprises. TestComplete often achieves quick ROI through time efficiency in testing, whereas UFT Developer’s ROI is less remarked upon due to its elevated costs.
What is SmartBear TestComplete?
TestComplete is a reliable, sturdy automated testing platform created by SmartBear Software. SmartBear Software is a worldwide technological leader known for developing quality enterprise-class development and testing solutions.
TestComplete simplifies the process of creating tests for numerous applications, including, but not limited to; Desktop, Android, IOS, Web browsers, and Windows. Application tests can be manual, scripted, and even recorded by using keyword-driven or data-driven functionality. There are even additional options for error reporting and automated playback. The object repository is extremely accurate and is fully customizable. TestComplete can easily be used by experienced developers and even by manual novice testers to develop quality automated UI tests quickly.
TestComplete offers three different testing scenarios:
Key Features
Reviews from Real Users
Sandhiya T S., Sr Solutions Engineer at Lexington Soft, relates, “The record and replay aspects of the solution are quite useful for people. With them, you don't have to write any scripts. Basically, you can record your actions and play them back later. The initial setup is also very easy.”
Sai S R., Staff Test Architect at a tech services company, says, "The most valuable features of the SmartBear TestComplete are self-healing, they reduce the maintenance required. The different languages SmartBear TestComplete supports are good because some of our libraries are written in Python, JavaScript, and C#. It's very easy to put them all under one project and use them."
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
