For functional testing, we are using OpenText Functional Testing for Developers as our product for testing. I am using the cross-browser testing capabilities of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers, and they are providing cross-browser testing and API support. We have a web application from our end, so cross-browser testing capability is necessary to qualify our web application in different browsers, which is very useful for me. The parallel test feature is important, and it is available. They support mobile testing as well. We had to do integration testing, and we are now looking into Katalon Studio for our automation for potential areas of improvement.
We create workload models based on requirements, which vary by company. We also create scenarios to simulate real-world environments. The main objectives are stress testing, endurance testing, and spike testing, all for performance testing. We monitor the application using tools like LoadRunner or JMeter and provide reports to clients.
We've used it across various technologies, including automation for web applications and SAP, as HP partnered with SAP for that integration. We've tried it on all platforms.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Functional Testing for Developers. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.
Senior Consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Vendor
Jan 4, 2023
We use Micro Focus UFT Developer because we had a desktop-based application. To automate it, we used UFT for the automation framework and to run tests, including the regression test, smoke test, and integration test. We use the data from the UFT framework. We had 10 users. That's where the license challenge comes into the picture because we couldn't afford that many licenses, so we had to reduce the team. We don't have plans to increase the number of users because we have been using UFT One for the past three months. The solution is deployed on-premises.
Systems Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Mar 30, 2021
We primarily use the solution in order to test functionality on other applications. It does have the capability of screengrabbing, recording, test automation, implementation of test cases, et cetera. It's called Unified Functional Test and therefore it does these functional requirements of the application in question.
Framework Architect and Test Automation Specialist at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Jan 30, 2021
We have many data centers, and the infrastructure for these is moving to the Amazon cloud. They are working towards a total transformation. We have a lot of mobile applications. Some of these are Java-based, but a number of them are Angular and Ionic-based. Here, our usage is as a simple record and playback utility. We perform unit testing as a one-off operation, and once we complete development tasks, we do the unit testing. Our developers only have two machines, one for .NET and one for Java. There is no commitment to buy these tools by their licensed permit.
We use this solution with one of the software applications that we have in our company, where we are trying to automate the different scenarios or workflows that we have. I would also like to see cloud-Ops.
Team Leader at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Oct 25, 2020
In a very small location, we are using this solution for the infrastructure-related applications for testing and with a very low number of licenses, only two. We are planning to change to SAP S/4HANA.
Programator at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Jan 22, 2020
I am a software developer and at my company, we use this solution for testing a banking ATM application that is written in C#. There is a customer screen that is part of a simulator for physical devices and different scenarios such as card and PIN entry have to be tested. Example test cases can be things like insufficient funds to dispense or it does not have the required bills. Another might be that the printer raises a hardware error. There are approximately 500 scenarios to test and in some, it will reject the transaction. We have UFT deployed on a TFS server and the test agents are running the scenarios on virtual machines.
We use both the on-premises and cloud deployment models of this solution. The testing tool needs to connect to the real environment and that almost always means on-premises. However, you can also use a cloud variant, but then you're working on virtual machines in the cloud.
Research & Development Engineer at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Aug 19, 2019
We use UFT Pro for all user testing platforms. We use the standard installation but we use UFT in two models. One is used for testing all functionalities in our environment and the second is one we are developing to use as a solution to test the availability of the environment in production. So UFT will check out the performance of the production environment every 12 minutes to be sure that the entire environment is stable. If we don't have any problem, the information is stored in a database and we do a BVD (Bank Vault Drawer) analysis of the information in the database for checking all banking applications. The application we are developing is J2EE (Jave Enterprise Edition) and we will have the information about the functionality. If we have a problem we call a team to send issues to them so they will work on this application to correct the problem in production. Using the same of monitoring, we will be able to monitor all availability and all access to an application really using only UFT. We use UFT to model for testing functionality in environmental tests, and after that, we use UFT to check and monitor all access and all applications to be sure these things are correctly functioning or not.
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and...
For functional testing, we are using OpenText Functional Testing for Developers as our product for testing. I am using the cross-browser testing capabilities of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers, and they are providing cross-browser testing and API support. We have a web application from our end, so cross-browser testing capability is necessary to qualify our web application in different browsers, which is very useful for me. The parallel test feature is important, and it is available. They support mobile testing as well. We had to do integration testing, and we are now looking into Katalon Studio for our automation for potential areas of improvement.
We are using OpenText UFT Developer ( /products/opentext-uft-developer-reviews ) for software testing and regression testing.
Our use case involves functionality for a system ERP. We work with Deviation, which is stable and receives positive feedback from users.
We create workload models based on requirements, which vary by company. We also create scenarios to simulate real-world environments. The main objectives are stress testing, endurance testing, and spike testing, all for performance testing. We monitor the application using tools like LoadRunner or JMeter and provide reports to clients.
We've used it across various technologies, including automation for web applications and SAP, as HP partnered with SAP for that integration. We've tried it on all platforms.
We use Micro Focus UFT Developer to perform functional testing on both a desktop application and a web application.
We use Micro Focus UFT Developer because we had a desktop-based application. To automate it, we used UFT for the automation framework and to run tests, including the regression test, smoke test, and integration test. We use the data from the UFT framework. We had 10 users. That's where the license challenge comes into the picture because we couldn't afford that many licenses, so we had to reduce the team. We don't have plans to increase the number of users because we have been using UFT One for the past three months. The solution is deployed on-premises.
Micro Focus UFT Developer's main focus is on your desktop application and web applications.
I'm head of testing services and we are partners with Micro Focus.
We are an IT-based company. We have our own product. I am primarily using Micro Focus UFT Developer for SAP applications such as SAP ECC and SAP HANA.
This solution is used for testing. It is usually used with our Quality Center solution.
We primarily use the solution in order to test functionality on other applications. It does have the capability of screengrabbing, recording, test automation, implementation of test cases, et cetera. It's called Unified Functional Test and therefore it does these functional requirements of the application in question.
We have many data centers, and the infrastructure for these is moving to the Amazon cloud. They are working towards a total transformation. We have a lot of mobile applications. Some of these are Java-based, but a number of them are Angular and Ionic-based. Here, our usage is as a simple record and playback utility. We perform unit testing as a one-off operation, and once we complete development tasks, we do the unit testing. Our developers only have two machines, one for .NET and one for Java. There is no commitment to buy these tools by their licensed permit.
We use this solution with one of the software applications that we have in our company, where we are trying to automate the different scenarios or workflows that we have. I would also like to see cloud-Ops.
In a very small location, we are using this solution for the infrastructure-related applications for testing and with a very low number of licenses, only two. We are planning to change to SAP S/4HANA.
I primarily use this solution for the automation of regression testing in SAP.
We use UFT Developer during the application testing process.
I am a software developer and at my company, we use this solution for testing a banking ATM application that is written in C#. There is a customer screen that is part of a simulator for physical devices and different scenarios such as card and PIN entry have to be tested. Example test cases can be things like insufficient funds to dispense or it does not have the required bills. Another might be that the printer raises a hardware error. There are approximately 500 scenarios to test and in some, it will reject the transaction. We have UFT deployed on a TFS server and the test agents are running the scenarios on virtual machines.
Our primary use at this time is mainly to automate testing of Windows and web-based GUIs.
We primarily use the solution to enable us to easily automate tasks on several different applications based on different technologies.
We use both the on-premises and cloud deployment models of this solution. The testing tool needs to connect to the real environment and that almost always means on-premises. However, you can also use a cloud variant, but then you're working on virtual machines in the cloud.
We primarily use the solution for automation testing.
We use UFT Pro for all user testing platforms. We use the standard installation but we use UFT in two models. One is used for testing all functionalities in our environment and the second is one we are developing to use as a solution to test the availability of the environment in production. So UFT will check out the performance of the production environment every 12 minutes to be sure that the entire environment is stable. If we don't have any problem, the information is stored in a database and we do a BVD (Bank Vault Drawer) analysis of the information in the database for checking all banking applications. The application we are developing is J2EE (Jave Enterprise Edition) and we will have the information about the functionality. If we have a problem we call a team to send issues to them so they will work on this application to correct the problem in production. Using the same of monitoring, we will be able to monitor all availability and all access to an application really using only UFT. We use UFT to model for testing functionality in environmental tests, and after that, we use UFT to check and monitor all access and all applications to be sure these things are correctly functioning or not.