Jun 22, 2015
https://www.scribd.com/doc/178422270/Soapui-vs-Soatest-comparison#scribd
Parasoft SOAtest and ReadyAPI Test compete in the API testing category. ReadyAPI Test often appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set and ease of use.
Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers valuable features such as service virtualization, data-driven testing, and strong support for various protocols. ReadyAPI Test presents advantages including comprehensive integrations, automated testing capabilities, and a broad range of built-in features without additional configuration.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could improve its reporting, enhance its documentation, and expand its user interface options. ReadyAPI Test might focus on boosting its performance, improving stability, and reducing initial setup complexity.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest is praised for its straightforward deployment and reliable support, ideal for enterprise environments. ReadyAPI Test, despite a somewhat complex setup, offers responsive support and a vast knowledge base.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is considered cost-effective with a good return on investment. ReadyAPI Test, while more expensive, justifies its cost with rich functionalities, making the investment worthwhile for many users.
Tasks that previously took four or five minutes can now be completed in 20 to 30 seconds with the help of the tool.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it.
In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
The best feature of Parasoft SOAtest is the extension tool where we can write our custom scripts.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Parasoft SOAtest | 1.7% |
| ReadyAPI Test | 1.6% |
| Other | 96.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
