Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Safer Planet vs McAfee Global Threat Intelligence [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Safer Planet
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (68th)
McAfee Global Threat Intell...
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Use IBM Safer Planet?
Share your opinion
Chetankumar Savalagimath - PeerSpot reviewer
Informative dashboards and integrates well with other products, but it needs artificial intelligence for more advanced threat detection
The product can be developed by bringing in AI and ML-based logic to learn from external emerging threats. This would help to keep the feeds real-time and secure the client's environment. Furthermore, it should use automation to notify customers or remediate the environment. The analytics and big data platform integration can be improved to provide better visibility of past data to look for existing threats or missed threats. It will be better able to predict future threats and be resilient against new threats, risks, or attacks. A cloud-based solution can be bought in to look for wider issues in external users or technologies.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Department of Science and Technology of the Republic of the Philippines, Rochester Police Department
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, CrowdStrike, VirusTotal and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: March 2025.
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.