Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Softek TDMF vs Vision Solutions Double-Take comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Users are hesitant to upgrade Vision Solutions Double-Take due to scalability doubts and lack of Windows 2016 support.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Vision Solutions Double-Take provides real-time replication, supporting server and SQL migrations with test failover capabilities while operational.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Vision Solutions Double-Take is stable, but limited Linux support and bandwidth reliance pose challenges for server migrations.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Vision Solutions Double-Take is praised for its customer service but needs improvement in Windows technical skills for complete satisfaction.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Softek TDMF
Ranking in Data Replication
21st
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Vision Solutions Double-Take
Ranking in Data Replication
20th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (28th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of IBM Softek TDMF is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Vision Solutions Double-Take is 1.1%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Replication
 

Featured Reviews

it_user150294 - PeerSpot reviewer
It very easy to setup and manage unless you have network problems.
There were restrictions when migrating from older to newer versions of Windows. As soon as the target disk is mounted on the higher level of Windows, NTFS file system will automatically be upgraded by Windows and will no longer be compatible with the source system. This means that migration cannot be resumed and a full refresh was needed to re-synchronize the source and target disks.
it_user157563 - PeerSpot reviewer
​Has improved our organization: it takes less time to replicate files between 2 servers.
File replication It takes less time to replicate files between 2 servers. 1 year. No issue so far. No issue so far. Not in the pipeline to upgrade. Customer Service: Good. Technical Support: Good. Yes, straightforward. In-house. Reduce man hour to manage file server. Original setup cost-…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Also Known As

Softek TDMF
Double-Take, DoubleTake
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

BT
ABC Fine Wine & Spirits, Accessor Capital Management, Adventist Health, Alfa Bank, Alphawest Services, Ameristar Casinos, Ambrian Capital PLC
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.