Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Spectrum Scale vs VMware vSAN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Spectrum Scale
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Software Defined Storage (SDS) (6th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (3rd)
VMware vSAN
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
229
Ranking in other categories
HCI (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

Janith Ranasinghe - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 14, 2022
A stable solution with valuable profile-sharing features
The profile share is a valuable feature. We only use the parallel file system at my company I rate this solution a nine out of ten. I believe there is no graphic user interface, so they should include it. We have been using this solution since 2014, and it is deployed on-premises. It is stable…
Lipaz Hessel - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 16, 2022
Expensive solution that requires professional services for installation and implementation
I'm still using a different solution. I only took two servers with vSAN to support one application that needs one feature that only VMware has. If not for that feature, I wouldn't touch VMware. Now, I'm looking at products like Nutanix, Silver Peak, Flexione, and FortiGate. For products that I choose, I don't need a specialist of that vendor. In VMware, I need a specialist in VMware. That's the issue I have with VMware. It's not like I can take any IT person, and they will know what to do. I need to make sure he will do the call, get the certificate and time to practice.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The high performance of the solution is its most valuable aspect. If you compare it to other storage solutions, it's much better."
"It has been pretty reliable throughout the years. As far as capacity is concerned, it can handle most heavy loads."
"Allows us to share files across multiple environments."
"The profile share is a valuable feature."
"Its great servicing high availability. That is what it is used for."
"It is incredibly scalable and stable."
"It makes our file system sharing a lot easier, even across different continents. We have had file systems shared across different continents with no performance degradation."
"We are using it for monitoring all of our storage."
"The solution is stable."
"It is easy to find information out there, not only from searching the web, but even the times I have engaged VMware support."
"It is more stable now than it was before. It's not like it was in the first year. Now it is stable, and we trust it more."
"When we do to do more scaled load testing, we can run more dense workloads and still have the same results across all specific nodes"
"The performance has exceeded our expectations and exceeded our traditional converged infrastructure."
"I like that we could choose whatever hardware we wanted, rather than having to use one particular vendor."
"Instead of going for SAN storage, customers can use the scale-up and scale-out features of VMware vSAN."
"I like the tolerance of VMware vSAN."
 

Cons

"Making it a little easier to add bad file sets would help. There is a transition to how you add storage and how you add a file set, so making that a little smoother would probably be my recommendation."
"The biggest problem is that it is not able to provide block storage."
"The solution's pricing could be better."
"The pricing and licensing model for this solution are complex and it is sometimes difficult to explain it to customers."
"The main issue that we have now is with the encryption. They want to use more metrics in encryption, which is not working very well."
"They should probably simply the Red Hat implementation portion. This portion was not as straightforward as I would like it to be."
"This is probably the biggest challenge, getting everything upgraded, because it just takes time. We wish it was a faster solution to be able to do everything at once, but you have do each node individually. The more nodes, the longer it takes."
"Maybe it needs integration with HA."
"The server files are larger than before."
"I have used the VMware Replication but I can't get it to work properly. The process should be simplified."
"The upgrading process could be simplified."
"In a future release, they could add micro-segmentation or security level features integrated into vSAN."
"I would rate the stability a seven out of ten."
"vSAN does not have online dedup. When opening the inline dedupe, the performance will be lower than off inline."
"I would like to see more support for applications. I think currently it only supports applications between two vSAN clusters."
"Lacks sufficient storage terabytes."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is costly but reliable."
"The licensing is based on the number of terabytes."
"The licensing model is complex and depends on factors such as the number of processing cores and the amount of storage."
"For a classical node plus storage solution, the price is higher."
"I would rate the licensing model a three out of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."
"It is expensive. It should be cheaper. It has a perpetual license as well as a subscription-based license, but they are moving towards subscription-based licenses."
"It is an expensive solution. There should be more flexible with licensing to allow small businesses the essentials of the solution's features."
"There is a license required for this solution, it is a one-time payment. However, if they want support for the solution, it can be paid annually or for three years."
"The product’s pricing is a bit higher than other solutions."
"My customers have found VMware vSAN to be a little expensive."
"This is a cost-effective product. It's a bit cheaper than the other solutions."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Government
8%
Educational Organization
51%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What Is The Biggest Difference Between vSAN And VxRail?
While both run on the vSAN technology from VMware, vSAN needs to be deployed on vSAN ready nodes while VxRail is an engineered system. The choice to choose which technology depends on two major fac...
Which would you choose - Nutanix Acropolis AOS or VMware vSAN?
We found the reduced power consumption with Nutanix Acropolis AOS a very attractive feature. We also like the interface that allows you to talk directly to your VM from the present software. We fou...
How does HPE Simplivity compare with VMware vSAN?
HPE SimpliVity is a hyper-converged infrastructure solution that is primarily geared to mid-sized companies. We researched VMware vSAN but found HPE was a better option for us. HPE SimpliVity has ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
vSAN
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Read Some Case Studies At Home Cloud CaribCINgroupDiscovery Check out the Rest of our Customer Stories Here
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Spectrum Scale vs. VMware vSAN and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.