IBM Storage Protect vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup comparison

IDERA SQL Safe Backup and IBM Storage Protect are both robust data protection solutions. IBM Storage Protect seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive features, which users feel is worth the price.

Features: IDERA SQL Safe Backup is praised for its compression and encryption capabilities, which offer efficient storage solutions and security. It also excels in its core backup functionalities. IBM Storage Protect stands out for its extensive integration with a wide range of storage hardware and advanced data management functionality. Additionally, IBM provides a more comprehensive suite of features for larger, enterprise-level deployments.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest that IDERA SQL Safe Backup could improve by enhancing its reporting tools and providing more frequent updates. Another area for improvement is the need for better user documentation. IBM Storage Protect users indicate a need for a simpler setup process and better technical support documentation. Another concern is the software’s resource intensity, which can be demanding on system performance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IDERA SQL Safe Backup is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. IBM Storage Protect's deployment can be more complex and may require specialized personnel, though its customer service is generally well-regarded. IDERA is preferred for quicker, hassle-free deployments, while IBM might need a more experienced implementation team but offers solid customer support.

Pricing and ROI: IDERA SQL Safe Backup is seen as a cost-effective solution, offering good ROI with lower initial setup costs. IBM Storage Protect, while more expensive upfront, delivers value through its extensive feature set and scalability, which justifies its higher cost according to user reviews. Users find IDERA more accessible in terms of cost, but IBM is viewed as a good long-term investment for larger infrastructures.