IBM Storage Protect vs N2WS Backup & Recovery comparison

IBM and N2WS are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. IBM is ranked #41 with an average rating of 8.5, while N2WS is ranked #43 with an average rating of 9.0. IBM holds a 0.4% mindshare in BRS, compared to N2WS’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of N2WS users who would recommend it.

IBM Storage Protect

Read 3 IBM Storage Protect reviews

343 Views
245 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

N2WS Backup & Recovery

Read 8 N2WS Backup & Recovery reviews

315 Views
193 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Storage Protect

N2WS Backup & Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

N2WS Backup & Recovery and IBM Storage Protect offer robust backup solutions with differing strengths. IBM Storage Protect appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set despite the higher cost.

Features: N2WS Backup & Recovery is valued for its user-friendly backup and recovery operations, graphical scheduling, and rapid restoration capabilities. IBM Storage Protect is praised for its extensive configuration options, scalability, and integration with cloud services. IBM's offering has the upper hand with advanced features that appeal to enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest that N2WS could enhance its reporting features and expand its support for additional platforms. IBM Storage Protect users desire a more intuitive setup process and improved documentation. N2WS needs to focus on feature expansion, while IBM should refine user guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: N2WS is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. IBM Storage Protect, while offering detailed configuration options, requires more initial setup effort. Users find IBM's customer support to be less consistent compared to N2WS. N2WS generally provides a smoother deployment experience and superior support.

Pricing and ROI: N2WS Backup & Recovery is highlighted for its cost-effectiveness and quick ROI, making it attractive to smaller organizations. IBM Storage Protect commands a higher price but justifies it with powerful features and long-term benefits, appealing to larger enterprises seeking comprehensive data protection solutions. N2WS has an advantage in cost, while IBM stands out for its value in feature-rich environments.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Storage Protect vs. N2WS Backup & Recovery Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Storage Protect vs. N2WS Backup & Recovery

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Storage Protect

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

41st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

N2WS Backup & Recovery

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

43rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (31st), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of IBM Storage Protect is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N2WS Backup & Recovery is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Maik Zutz

Produktverantwortlicher Storage und Backup at BITMARCK TECHNIK GmbH

A stable enterprise solution for backup and restore

New workloads are not good for storage protect like container or virtual machines. IBM acknowledges that users and partners with companies do it better and integrate it into the product. It takes too much time to implement it in old Storage Protect. It have features for big databases and big data environments. Although, the product seems to be old fashioned, but it is stable, robust and works for the most use cases where a lot of data is to be protected. It could be easier to manage client data. You have to use configuration. It is not on modern architecture. They should change it on the client area. You can achieve a better environment using Protect. IBM tapes serves as an air gap, consumes less energy, and provides a resilient, stable environment with fewer infrastructure and environmental costs. Intergrating it can help store large amounts of data more cheaper than on disk.

Read full review

Cezar Ashkar

Cloud Engineer at Digico Solutions

Easy to use and setup

One valuable feature is the easy-to-use GUI There is room for improvement in stability. I have been using this solution for a few months. We currently use the latest version. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. It is a scalable solution. The technical support of N2WS has an…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's backup engine is very powerful. Previously, our client finished backup with HPE product in 48 hours. IBM Storage Protect completes backup in 8 hours."

"Overall, my experience with the solution is very positive, and I rate it a 9 out of 10."

"The best point about IBM Storage Protect is that it can use IBM tape environments, which we still use and will continue to use in the future."

"The recovery time is fantastic and proven. Also, by providing a simple interface, the solution lowers the cost."

"Provides easy, one-click functionality and flexible backup policies and schedules for AWS workloads."

"The backup and recovery are the most valuable features. So, our developers can work with confidence."

"N2WS Backup & Recovery is very easy to use and configure backup for AWS instances."

"The product is successful with the SMB market."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."

"The backup and restore functionality is very easy to use and manage."

Cons

"Some features are outdated as the product does not use the latest technologies. The graphical user interface, known as the operation center, is not very well designed. Additionally, IBM Storage Protect does not work well with virtual environments such as VMware and Hyper-V."

"The product should improve its GUI. It should also support Windows clustering."

"The solution is expensive."

"The GUI could be slightly improved."

"The GUI has room for improvement."

"More documentation would be helpful, especially some step-by-step documents for recovery scenarios."

"Additional features I would like to see are the ability to restore to different vendors, AWS and Azure, and/or the ability or take the information out of the AWS cloud."

"There is room for improvement in stability."

"The UI is a little dated and hard to use. Some of the buttons are a bit small. You have to go into the menu to get the settings you want."

"The solution has the option to take backup on-prem servers, but it's not very efficient."

"It's a global feature that the customer thinks they don't have enough tools to manage, to copy, to delay, and to classify the object file in the backup directory. So they need more tools to manage files in object directory."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM Storage Protect is not expensive and fits the needs of all business types. The licensing is based on a capacity-based model. You can take a license for one, two, or three terabytes."

"The pricing and licensing on AWS is fine, because you can do it for smaller tiers depending on your number of instances, so it's not that scary."

"The price is not cheap, nor is it costly."

"It has very good pricing per instance and comes with three options, for both small and large environments, to fit your needs."

"AWS adds more features and offer things for free, or cheaply. Therefore, we will be evaluating AWS Data Lifecycle Manager, because it will probably do backups. Thus, make sure the product that you are using is competitive or adds more value than AWS."

"It's very economical and worth the cost."

"The purchasing process through the AWS Marketplace is easy. Just click the button."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

25%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Storage Protect?

The best point about IBM Storage Protect is that it can use IBM tape environments, which we still use and will continue to use in the future.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Storage Protect?

IBM Storage Protect is generally an expensive tool. However, with good contracts with IBM or its partners, the cost might not be so high. New customers can expect very high prices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Storage Protect?

Some features are outdated as the product does not use the latest technologies. The graphical user interface, known as the operation center, is not very well designed. Additionally, IBM Storage Pro...

See all answers

What do you like most about N2WS Backup & Recovery?

N2WS Backup & Recovery is very easy to use and configure backup for AWS instances.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for N2WS Backup & Recovery?

I used the free version. I don't have much experience with the paid version. But I'm trying to compare the pricing between different options.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N2WS Backup & Recovery?

N2WS Backup & Recovery efficiently takes cloud backups on EC2 instances. The solution has the option to take backup on-prem servers, but it's not very efficient.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Spectrum Protect vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 61% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 24% of the time

IBM Storage Protect Plus vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 15% of the time

More IBM Storage Protect Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs N2WS Backup & Recovery

Compared 28% of the time

AWS Backup vs N2WS Backup & Recovery

Compared 27% of the time

Druva Phoenix vs N2WS Backup & Recovery

Compared 16% of the time

Eon.io vs N2WS Backup & Recovery

Compared 16% of the time

Rubrik vs N2WS Backup & Recovery

Compared 13% of the time

More N2WS Backup & Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

March 2025

Download IBM Storage Protect product report

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

April 2025

Download N2WS Backup & Recovery product report

Also Known As

No data available

N2WS Cloud Protection Manager

Overview

IBM Storage Protect is designed for data backup and recovery, ensuring protection of critical information and business continuity. It is ideal for managing large-scale datasets and offers compatibility across cloud and on-premises environments.

IBM Storage Protect provides robust data backup and recovery features, supporting multiple workloads while integrating effortlessly with different platforms. It is known for reliable performance, scalability for growing storage needs, and automation of repetitive tasks. Users find it effective in protecting expansive datasets through efficient deduplication.

What are the key features of IBM Storage Protect?

Data Backup and Recovery: Comprehensive data protection in diverse environments.
Integration: Seamless collaboration with various systems.
Scalability: Handles growing storage demands effectively.
Deduplication: Efficient data deduplication to optimize storage use.

What benefits or ROI should be considered when evaluating IBM Storage Protect?

Reliable Performance: Consistently protects multiple workloads.
Compatibility: Works well with cloud and on-premises systems.
Automation: Automates repetitive tasks to save time and resources.

IBM Storage Protect is implemented in various industries, supporting sectors with significant data management requirements like finance, healthcare, and retail. These industries benefit from its robust data protection, scalability, and ease of integration, making it a preferred choice for organizations with large and complex datasets.

IBM

N2WS Backup & Recovery is a comprehensive backup and recovery solution designed to protect critical data and applications in the cloud. The solution is highly regarded for its ease of use, making it a popular choice for organizations of all sizes. With its help, users can easily manage backups, schedule backups, and restore data and applications with just a few clicks.

N2WS Backup & Recovery also has a range of advanced features, including automated backup policies, cross-region replication, and disaster recovery capabilities.

N2WS

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Coca-Cola, tecRacer, Cloudar, Goodwill

Buyer's Guide

IBM Storage Protect vs. N2WS Backup & Recovery

April 2025

Free Report: IBM Storage Protect vs. N2WS Backup & Recovery

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Storage Protect vs. N2WS Backup & Recovery and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Storage Protect vs. N2WS Backup & Recovery report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.