IBM StoredIQ vs Lucidworks comparison

IBM and Lucidworks are both solutions in the Indexing and Search category. IBM is ranked #20, while Lucidworks is ranked #6. IBM holds a 0.1% mindshare in IS, compared to Lucidworks’s 9.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lucidworks users who would recommend it.

IBM StoredIQ

Read 1 IBM StoredIQ review

47 Views
29 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Lucidworks

Read 2 Lucidworks reviews

346 Views
205 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM StoredIQ

Lucidworks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM StoredIQ and Lucidworks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Luigi's Box, IBM and others in Indexing and Search.

To learn more, read our detailed Indexing and Search Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Indexing and Search

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

IBM StoredIQ

Ranking in Indexing and Search

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

eDiscovery (28th)

Lucidworks

Ranking in Indexing and Search

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Indexing and Search category, the mindshare of IBM StoredIQ is 0.1%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lucidworks is 9.4%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Indexing and Search

Featured Reviews

Giuseppe-Barillari

Delivery Manager at Gesel

Helps with GDPR compliance through data discovery and management

We knew that we have a lot of scanned docs inside our repositories, but there was a big issue where we needed to know which content was really an image. Because of the OCR made at runtime during the scan, now we know exactly the data we have. When you have zipped documents the scan will unzip them and find the data inside.

Read full review

Omark

Department Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides the ability to control how indexing and searching perform

* Facets were one of the major features which provide powerful ways to filter search results. * A wide range of connectors allows you to utilize Fusion on different areas. * Ability to control how indexing and searching perform and controls how the scoring for search results is done, letting you customize the search experience according to your needs. * High availability

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IBM StoredIQ Suite helps to address problems like data discovery, records management, compliance activities, storage optimization, and data migration initiatives."

"The valuable features are automation and multiple connectors available out of the box. It is simple to manage and easier to use for all users."

"Provides the ability to control how indexing and searching perform and controls how the scoring for search results is done, letting you customize the search experience according to your needs."

Cons

"The product was born and designed to be used inside the IT department, but it would be improved by allowing end-users to search for info related to specific needs."

"Having some kind of prebuilt client UI will be helpful."

"The solution could improve by adding more AI and natural language processing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price of the solution is a little high and the downside is there is not a perpetual license available. I have to renew it annually. The price of Lucidworks can be difficult for some of my clients to afford."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Indexing and Search solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

33%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

No data available

Coveo vs Lucidworks

Compared 47% of the time

Elastic Search vs Lucidworks

Compared 33% of the time

Attivio vs Lucidworks

Compared 20% of the time

More Lucidworks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Indexing and Search

October 2024

Download IBM StoredIQ product report

Buyer's Guide

Indexing and Search

October 2024

Download Lucidworks product report

Learn More

IBM

Video not available

Lucidworks

Overview

IBM StoredIQ addresses the problems that challenge records management, electronic discovery, compliance, storage optimization and data migration initiatives. By providing an in-depth assessment of unstructured data where it resides, the software gives organizations visibility into data to make more informed business and legal decisions.

Lucidworks builds AI-powered search and discovery applications for some of the world's largest brands. Fusion, Lucidworks' advanced development platform, provides the enterprise-grade capabilities needed to design, develop and deploy intelligent search apps at any scale.

Sample Customers

J.B. Hunt Transport, BBVA Compass

Wells Fargo, Cisco, Nike, Target, Verizon, Hortonworks

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Luigi's Box, IBM and others in Indexing and Search. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Indexing and Search vendors.

We monitor all Indexing and Search reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.