Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM StoredIQ vs Smarsh eDiscovery comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM StoredIQ
Ranking in eDiscovery
30th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Indexing and Search (22nd)
Smarsh eDiscovery
Ranking in eDiscovery
11th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the eDiscovery category, the mindshare of IBM StoredIQ is 0.2%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Smarsh eDiscovery is 3.3%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
eDiscovery
 

Featured Reviews

GB
Helps with GDPR compliance through data discovery and management
We knew that we have a lot of scanned docs inside our repositories, but there was a big issue where we needed to know which content was really an image. Because of the OCR made at runtime during the scan, now we know exactly the data we have. When you have zipped documents the scan will unzip them and find the data inside.
Use Smarsh eDiscovery?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus eDiscovery, Autonomy eDiscovery, HPE Autonomy eDiscovery, HPE eDiscovery, Actiance
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

J.B. Hunt Transport, BBVA Compass
Bank AlJazira, MTS India, Vodafone Ireland
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Microsoft, Commvault and others in eDiscovery. Updated: December 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.