IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence comparison

IBM and Broadcom are both solutions in the Mainframe Management category. IBM is ranked #1, while Broadcom is ranked #6. IBM holds a 29.1% mindshare in MM, compared to Broadcom’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution.

IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON

Read 1 IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON review

1,079 Views
889 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Read 27 OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence reviews

201 Views
124 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON

Ranking in Mainframe Management

1st

Average Rating

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Ranking in Mainframe Management

6th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Mainframe Management category, the mindshare of IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON is 29.1%, up from 27.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 2.6%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mainframe Management

Featured Reviews

Peter Beylemans

Mainframe Support at AG Insurance

Good stability but it is lacking the ability to see historical information

We can only see online information but there isn't any historical data to see something that happened a few hours previous. We don't have the ability to access that information. Previously, with MainView, we could look back at information from two days before and get information. We could easily get information from Plexus. Now, we don't have a single screen to check which has been annoying. Compared to MainView, Tivoli is rubbish. We are forced to use this solution. We couldn't stay with MainView. I would like for it to be easier to check the system performance. It should have the ability to see historical data. We can't see the percentages to see the percentages of the CPU utilized. We should be able to see how much was used by our part of the system. Now, we have to continuously recalculate that information.

Read full review

it_user351621

IT System Analyst - Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The ability to use command rules is great when our operators have repetitive tasks, but we'd like to automate off of different highlighted messages without actually knowing what the message is.

One of the things we've been wanting to do is to be able to automate off of different highlighted messages without actually knowing what the message is. For example, we'd like to be able to create some generic automation when we receive a warning or alert message to allow, if nothing else, the automation team to know so we can contact the product owner. If there's something we can do to automate or expedite notification to the proper people, we want to try to do that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's stable enough. I haven't noticed any problems since it was installed."

"The follow-up surprised me. Making sure that I am happy with what I have gone to them on. They will call after I have made changes and verify that I am happy with the changes that I did have to make. If it did not fix the complete problem, they go back over it until I am satisfied."

"Because we can define complex commands, the training of new operators is quicker. We can also put checks in place, that will prevent user errors."

"Valuable features include: SSM, which provides for orderly startup and shutdown; OPSLOG, which enables filtering by message-id, and/or jobname(s); Rules, as OPS/REXX interface streamlines deployment, interfaces easily with JES2 and z/OS."

"It is an easy product to use and it is stable."

"It reduces the number of repetitive motions required by a human to respond to the system."

"It's a very stable product. I very much like the SSM stuff in it. The rules engine, it's awesome."

"It's very secure, because it's a legacy application."

"The performance of it is beyond exceptional. It is probably one of the best products that I have ever worked with. It is easy to use, comprehensive, and can perform almost any task you need it to."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros

Cons

"We can't see the percentages to see the percentages of the CPU utilized. We should be able to see how much was used by our part of the system. Now, we have to continuously recalculate that information."

"The GUI interface could be improved, but that is coming. They are working on that."

"Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions."

"The reason sometimes it is not stable, we do not have the expertise to write the script."

"Some of the command sequences are too long."

"The further expansion of the mainframe teamcenter interface. Also, the web services support is something that I am looking into."

"It’s a complex product. The initial installation is easy, but implementing various functions is a constant process."

"It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it."

"Scalability is zero. It cannot be scaled because of its age."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mainframe Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

19%

Government

12%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Logistics Company

21%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

BMC MainView vs IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON

Compared 29% of the time

ASG TMON vs IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON

Compared 26% of the time

SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence vs IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON

Compared 25% of the time

Rocket Software Mainframe vs IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON

Compared 12% of the time

IntelliMagic Vision for zOS vs IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON

Compared 9% of the time

More IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON Competitors

CA Automation Point vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 100% of the time

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors

Product Reports

No data available

Buyer's Guide

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

April 2025

Download OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report

Also Known As

IBM Candle, OMEGAMON

CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation

Overview

IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON Performance Management Suite for z/OS is designed to provide real-time and historical performance and availability management. It offers these capabilities for IBM z/OS operating system, networks, storage subsystems, Java runtimes, IBM DB2, IBM CICS, IBM IMS, IBM MQ for z/OS and IBM WebSphere Application Server for z/OS in a single package. Optimize the efficiency and effectiveness of managing z/OS environments with a powerful, integrated tool set.

OMEGAMON Performance Management Suite for z/OS is available as part of IBM Service Management Suite for z/OS. IBM Service Management Suite for z/OS includes IBM Service Management Unite—a service management dashboard that brings mainframe management information and tasks from disparate sources into a single environment.

IBM

z/OS, its subsystems, databases, middleware, applications, and software generate thousands of event messages daily. IT professionals need a tool to filter, prioritize, and respond quickly to these events before they impact availability and threaten business processing and associated service level agreements. CA OPS/MVS EMA automates processes, enabling you to resolve problems as they arise. It also automates more routine tasks, simplifying IT management and operations.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Sharp Corporation

Tieto

See our list of best Mainframe Management vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.