IBM WebSphere Studio Developer vs Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 comparison

IBM and Nexaweb are both solutions in the .NET Development Services category. IBM is ranked #11, while Nexaweb is ranked #13. IBM holds a 2.6% mindshare in NDS, compared to Nexaweb’s 0.7% mindshare.

IBM WebSphere Studio Developer

91 Views
16 Comparison Views

Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0

43 Views
6 Comparison Views

IBM WebSphere Studio Developer

Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere Studio Developer and Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Adobe, FourJs and others in .NET Development Services.

To learn more, read our detailed .NET Development Services Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

.NET Development Services

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,335 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM WebSphere Studio Developer

Ranking in .NET Development Services

11th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0

Ranking in .NET Development Services

13th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the .NET Development Services category, the mindshare of IBM WebSphere Studio Developer is 2.6%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

.NET Development Services

Buyer's Guide

.NET Development Services

March 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Adobe, FourJs and others in .NET Development Services. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparisons

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

.NET Development Services

March 2025

Download IBM WebSphere Studio Developer product report

Buyer's Guide

.NET Development Services

March 2025

Download Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 product report

Also Known As

WebSphere Studio Developer

Enterprise Web 2.0

Overview

IBM WebSphere Studio Application Developer is an easy-to-use, integrated development environment for building, testing, and deploying Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE platform) applications. It is designed for professional developers requiring integrated Web, JSP, XML and Web services support.

IBM

The Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 platform has been used to modernize hundreds of client/server applications. It embraces open standards, is extensible and enables re-use. Furthermore, the Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 platform enables customers to develop distributed, interactive, rich applications that require outstanding reliability and performance, such as those in financial trading, order management, product configuration, and business-to-business self-service.

Nexaweb

Sample Customers

Alpha Modus, Apptimate AB, Senet Inc., Australian Government Department of Defence, Factor-y S.r.l., Foedus, Elemental Path, CinePostproduction, UniCredit, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp., Lodha Group

Samsung, LG, Oracle, MetLife, Toyota, Hyundai, Sungard, Patagonia, Pepsico

Buyer's Guide

.NET Development Services

March 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Adobe, FourJs and others in .NET Development Services. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.

We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.