Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IDERA DB Optimizer vs Quest Foglight for Databases comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IDERA DB Optimizer
Ranking in Database Development and Management
36th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Quest Foglight for Databases
Ranking in Database Development and Management
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Database Development and Management category, the mindshare of IDERA DB Optimizer is 0.8%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quest Foglight for Databases is 7.6%, up from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database Development and Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use IDERA DB Optimizer?
Share your opinion
Vadim Kulikov - PeerSpot reviewer
Excels at displaying intensive database queries and enables me to address things before they become real problems
Foglight does have a component that allows you to look at things in real time, but it's not as friendly or as efficient in terms of responsiveness as Quest Spotlight is. Foglight might be lacking in this department. It could be just the nature of the beast, it could be the fact that it's web-based, as opposed to Spotlight being a fat client running on C#. I use both tools in conjunction with each other; they are a part of the toolset. Foglight might not be as helpful. It's also possible that part of the issue is how Foglight is deployed. We always try to save on cost and because it requires a SQL license, you don't necessarily have the luxury of putting it on a super fast server. It could be related to that. But I have noticed that it's not as responsive for determining, in real time, what's going on. The way I have understood things is that there was an attempt to merge Spotlight functionality with Foglight. They have somewhat done that, even though I still feel that they're not going to be able to completely kill Spotlight. That tool is done so well and it's really serving a purpose in terms of a real-time, very fast analysis of multiple metrics. I don't like what they did with Foglight because it's an attempt to merge. It's like a sports car versus a heavy-duty truck. They are both fantastic, but when you try to jack up a truck to work fast, it doesn't work very well.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest Foglight for Databases?
The price of Foglight could be a little more competitive in Chile, and it should be lowered for long-time customers— at least by 20 percent. Sometimes the price is a limitation. We have seven insta...
What needs improvement with Quest Foglight for Databases?
Quest must release a Spanish version. That's critical because not everyone speaks English in Latin America. It's an excellent product, so it's super important that they offer the application and cu...
What is your primary use case for Quest Foglight for Databases?
We use Foglight for database engines and Google servers. We use it in a private cloud, our cloud provider is Google Cloud Platform. Foglight is centralized in our data center, from there, we send i...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

FIS Global; Baron Software
CommitDBA
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, SolarWinds, Nutanix and others in Database Development and Management. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.