Imanami GroupID vs Zilla Security comparison

Imanami and Zilla Security are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Imanami is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.0, while Zilla Security is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.0. Imanami holds a 0.4% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Zilla Security’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Imanami users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zilla Security users who would recommend it.

Imanami GroupID

Read 3 Imanami GroupID reviews

272 Views
120 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zilla Security

Read 2 Zilla Security reviews

222 Views
140 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Imanami GroupID

Zilla Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 2, 2024

Imanami GroupID and Zilla Security compete in identity and access management, with Zilla Security having an edge due to its comprehensive features, although Imanami GroupID offers better pricing and support.

Features: Imanami GroupID focuses on group management, delegation capabilities, and process automation. Zilla Security offers advanced access control, compliance monitoring, and a robust security solution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imanami GroupID is known for quick setup and effective support. Zilla Security requires more involved setup but benefits from strong customer service that aids detailed onboarding.

Pricing and ROI: Imanami GroupID has a more appealing pricing model with lower initial setup costs and good short-term ROI. Zilla Security demands higher initial investment but provides better long-term ROI due to extensive security features.

To learn more, read our detailed Imanami GroupID vs. Zilla Security Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Imanami GroupID vs. Zilla Security

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Imanami GroupID

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

25th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (11th), Active Directory Management (16th)

Zilla Security

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

17th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Imanami GroupID is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zilla Security is 1.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Jonathan Cauthorn

Identity and Access Management Manager at NeuGen

Simplifies the task of managing groups and is affordable and easy to implement

I'd like to see it be able to do more than just groups. I'd like it to be able to do some things with email distribution lists as well. It can do that, but there were a few things that were limiting. It was difficult to get it set up, particularly with Azure in the cloud. I'd like that to be a little bit smoother. I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools. We've got a ton of groups, and it does take quite a while to do nightly processing. This is something that definitely needs improvement.

Read full review

Hubert Hopkins

IT Compliance Analyst at The Baldwin Group

Reasonably priced, responsive support, and easy to implement access reviews

There is still no automated way to de-provision access due to a review completion, but they are getting there in terms of making it unified. Right now it is just a one-way integration, importing user lists. I believe they working on it. I can pull a user list in, but when I do a review, the results get sent to a ticket which requires a person to execute. As a result of the review, there is no automation for the removal of access. They are going there, and the next step is to continue to streamline the process operationally and resource-wise. The review process is great. The scope for improvement is more at the results end. It would be great if it could systematically communicate with that end system and remove the requested access automatically.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system. Based on that job code, we use the query tool and say that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should. That runs every night, and the next day, everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."

"I have found the overall features to be useful."

"Imanami GroupID's UI is good."

"I enjoy the ease of setup and creation of a review. Being a user of the tool or kind of an admin of the tool, the ease of setup of an access review is valuable."

"We had these spreadsheets all over the place, but now we have a library of evidence to consult when needed. Zilla keeps everything in one place. It's not scattered all over anymore."

Cons

"The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO."

"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools."

"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."

"There is still no automated way to de-provision access as a result of a review, but they are getting there in terms of making it unified. They are getting closer to that."

"Maybe this is coming with their AI module, but I would like to see a feature that performs baseline analysis of permissions that may not fit into a role, and it attempts to group them into a role. We've run into problems with applications where someone has not created a role but assigned ad hoc permissions to a user. We still need to do some manual work to identify the group that the user belongs to. It would be amazing to have Zilla streamline that."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"It is on a yearly basis, and it has the product license fee and the support for it. So, there is the licensing fee, and there is the annual maintenance that includes the support. I don't remember exactly, but we're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of $20,000 to $30,000 for it per year. We've got a pretty large implementation of it, and for the amount that we do, it is a pretty good deal. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"It has been fair because we have been in from the beginning or close to the beginning. I know it is not truly an identity access management system yet, but its price was one of the appealing factors for us to purchase it at the time. It was reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Security Firm

30%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Imanami GroupID?

Imanami GroupID's UI is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Imanami GroupID?

The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Imanami GroupID?

The notifications, approvals and emails are very smooth in Imanami GroupID. I rate it an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zilla Security?

It has been fair because we have been in from the beginning or close to the beginning. I know it is not truly an identity access management system yet, but its price was one of the appealing factor...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zilla Security?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zilla Security?

We use the tool for access reviews. It is mainly for our regulatory SOX compliance. That was the main use case, and why we purchased Zilla back at the end of 2021.

See all answers

Comparisons

Fischer Identity Governance vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 35% of the time

e-trust Horacius vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 35% of the time

Netwrix Auditor vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 30% of the time

More Imanami GroupID Competitors

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Zilla Security

Compared 61% of the time

Veza vs Zilla Security

Compared 25% of the time

Lumos vs Zilla Security

Compared 14% of the time

More Zilla Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

User Provisioning Software

March 2025

Download Imanami GroupID product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity Management (IM)

April 2025

Download Zilla Security product report

Overview

Groups don’t live forever. Project teams disband, departments re-organize, and employees change status. GroupID from Imanami leverages the pervasiveness of Microsoft® Active Directory and empowers IT professionals with the tools needed to effectively provision and manage users. Users can be quickly entered into the correct distribution and security groups, and are easily managed across multiple systems.

There Are Three Main Benefits To A Complete Group Management Solution:

Reduce the load on the IT staff and helpdesk
Improve employee productivity by putting users in the correct distribution groups immediately
Improve security by having each security group’s membership accurate immediately

Groups Are Never Out Of Date.

Users are empowered to solve common problems independently. Security and access aren’t compromised. IT is empowered with the right tools to help employees. Staff productivity goes up. What more could you want?

Imanami

Zilla enables you to maintain a secure and compliant posture for identity and access across your attack surface.
We bring all your digital services into one unified identity security solution – even your apps with no security APIs. We put you in control and prevent identity and access breaches.
Zilla enables you to maintain a secure and compliant posture for identity and access across your attack surface.
We bring all your digital services into one unified identity security solution – even your apps with no security APIs. We put you in control and prevent identity and access breaches.

Zilla Security

Sample Customers

Grant Thornton LLP

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Imanami GroupID vs. Zilla Security

March 2025

Free Report: Imanami GroupID vs. Zilla Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Imanami GroupID vs. Zilla Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Imanami GroupID vs. Zilla Security report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.