ImmuniWeb vs Invicti comparison

ImmuniWeb and Invicti are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. ImmuniWeb is ranked #33, while Invicti is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5. ImmuniWeb holds a 0.8% mindshare in SAST, compared to Invicti’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of ImmuniWeb users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Invicti users who would recommend it.

ImmuniWeb

Read 7 ImmuniWeb reviews

2,053 Views
1,170 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Invicti

Read 31 Invicti reviews

5,070 Views
3,042 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ImmuniWeb

Invicti

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Invicti and ImmuniWeb are key players in the cybersecurity industry. ImmuniWeb appears to have an edge with its advanced features and comprehensive offering, while Invicti remains preferred for its cost-effectiveness and customer support.

Features: Invicti excels in accurate vulnerability detection, ease of integration, and reliability, providing a user-friendly experience. ImmuniWeb offers a comprehensive security testing suite, AI-driven analysis, and innovative features, offering additional security insights that are highly valued by users.

Room for Improvement: Invicti could benefit from enhancements in scan speeds, report clarity, and UI intuitiveness. ImmuniWeb users suggest improvements in customer documentation, onboarding processes, and feature accessibility. Both products can explore optimizing certain functionalities to better meet user expectations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Invicti is known for straightforward deployment and supportive customer service, making it user-friendly. ImmuniWeb provides flexible deployment options and responsive service, ensuring quick adaptability. Invicti is slightly more user-friendly, whereas ImmuniWeb excels in deployment flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: Invicti offers competitive pricing with solid ROI, making it attractive to budget-conscious buyers. ImmuniWeb, although often priced higher, delivers substantial ROI through advanced features and widespread coverage. It justifies its cost with significant value, while Invicti remains a viable option for cost-effective solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed ImmuniWeb vs. Invicti Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ImmuniWeb vs. Invicti

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 892,646 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ImmuniWeb

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

33rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Attack Surface Management (ASM) (28th)

Invicti

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Security (24th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (8th), API Security (9th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (4th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of ImmuniWeb is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Invicti is 1.7%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Invicti	1.7%
ImmuniWeb	0.8%
Other	97.5%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Vivek Ashvinbhai Pancholi

Senior Cybersecurity Consultant at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Commendable Solution with Robust Vulnerability Detection Mechanism Suitable for Global Market

The solution helped us with one of our clients in the New York area contacted us about a data breach. In response, we swiftly organized a case meeting involving our client, internal, and email customer support teams. Together, we conducted an incident response, facilitating offline assistance for proper planning and risk management processes. We delved into the details of the data breach, identified how it occurred, and collaborated to rectify the issue. The client expressed satisfaction with the resolution process.

Read full review

Valavan Sivgalingam

Senior Manager, Security Engineering at ESS

Dynamic testing regularly identifies web vulnerabilities and has strong false positive confirmations

It has good false positive confirmations, confirmed issues identification, and proof of exploit-related features as part of it. We use Invicti for these things in our portfolios. The solution includes Proof-Based Scanning technology. Invicti is part of our SSDLC portfolio, and DAST dynamic testing is very important for our web applications and portfolios. For both the API endpoints and web applications, we do regular testing on a monthly basis for all our releases. Invicti does a good job. The only concern is on the performance side, but other than that, we find it really helpful in identifying web vulnerabilities. A full scan takes more time based on your website and other factors, but for us, it takes more than two to three days. The scan performance can be improved upon. When we check with them, they discuss proof-based scanning and related aspects. However, there could be intermittent results that could help us.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have managed to deliver to my clients the services of Ethical Hacking in less time, with better deliverables, and other key differentiators that make my company more competitive in the local market."

"The most valuable features are the SLA of Zero false-positives, less time of service development, validation of unlimited patched vulnerabilities, and several others."

"ImmuniWeb is stable."

"The solution's most valuable feature is reporting."

"After the assessment, you clearly know which assets require penetration testing."

"I like the fully automated continuous discovery run by ImmuniWeb in the background. We do not need to rerun the same tests or the same scanning against our resources. We need to supply our IP addresses, domain names, and significant resources with special domain names and URLs, and we need to do it only once. Then we always have an up-to-date picture. I also like the integration with our single sign-on system. We do not need to maintain a separate set of usernames or user accounts. We can plug this ImmuniWeb service into our authentication technology, enabling two-factor authentication. We have secure authentication right out of the box. The other important feature I like is the executive view. You can easily switch from a technical view to an executive view and have a helicopter view of the compliance status. We can see how much effort is required and our current status."

"The ImmuniWeb Platform is the best and easiest way to secure a business online."

"The initial setup process is user-friendly."

More ImmuniWeb pros

"It is a very good tool."

"I would definitely recommend to those who really want to know in-depth details of their applications/products regarding the security of their web system."

"It has improved the security of our code by scanning it and finding security defects."

"The solution generates reports automatically and quickly and it's a very user-friendly product."

"Netsparker has valuable features, including the ability to scan our website, an interactive approach, and security data integration."

"One of the features I like about this program is the low number of false positives and the support it offers."

"Invicti's proactive scanning measures vulnerabilities each time we deploy or push code to a new environment."

"The solution generates reports automatically and quickly."

More Invicti pros

Cons

"The product’s interface for the web applications could be similar to Android and iOS versions."

"A great idea would be to support using Discovery on the internal network, allowing delivery of all the features of the current Discovery to internal network resources."

"It would be better if they had an automated tagging feature. The tagging functionality currently requires manual tagging, and that's probably the most needed feature from my standpoint. We also do not have enough tools, enough features, or options to display different resources in the way we need. There are basic grouping and some filtering features, but we still cannot fully separate some flavors of our resources. However, we may not be aware of the latest features."

"Its technical support could be better."

"The deployment process on the cloud is straightforward, while on-premise can be complex. Support is generally excellent, although there can be delays in ticket resolution."

"You may find the dashboard a bit complicated."

"ImmuniWeb sometimes shows previous scans instead of running tests."

More ImmuniWeb cons

"The proxy review, the use report views, the current use tool and the subset requests need some improvement."

"They need to improve their support in the documentation. Their support mechanism is missing. Their responsiveness, technical staff, and these types of things need to be improved, and comprehensive documentation is required. They should have good self-service portal enhancement"

"Right now, they are missing the static application security part, especially web application security."

"They could enhance the support for data swap testing for the platform."

"Invicti's reporting capabilities need enhancement. We need enterprise-level information instead of repo-level details. Unlike Appiro, Invicti does not provide portfolio-level insights into vulnerability remediation over time."

"Maybe the ability to make a good reporting format is needed."

"Reporting should be improved. The reporting options should be made better for end-users."

"Netsparker doesn't provide the source code of the static application security testing."

More Invicti cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There should be the flexibility to change or add pricing, especially for pay-per-use cases."

"The values of ImmuniWeb are currently significantly below what is valued in the Chilean market for these services and solutions."

"It is pretty expensive."

"ImmuniWeb is relatively cheap. It's a competitive price compared to other products in the marketplace. It's worth the money we are paying for it."

"I use the product's free version. The tool costs around 229 dollars."

"The platform is expensive if a large development is involved. However, it is less expensive for scheduled-based testing, quarterly or in a year."

"It is pretty expensive."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"It is competitive in the security market."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?

That's one of the most critical questions any development team faces! Securing a web application requires a layered approach, not a single tool. Here is a quick breakdown of what to recommend: In...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

The setup cost is pretty competitive. For example, if you want to talk about the SAST license, it comes to about $150 or sometimes less than $100, depending on the conversion or the number of licen...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Invicti?

At this time, there is nothing that comes to mind. However, most of the products in the market are pretty much neck-to-neck competitors. Speaking about it, there are a couple of factors which they ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Invicti?

I have worked on a couple of products, specifically in web application security. I have worked on Invicti, and with respect to PAM, I have worked with BeyondTrust. I have not worked specifically fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 7% of the time

Acunetix vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 6% of the time

Bitsight vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 6% of the time

Bugcrowd vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 6% of the time

More ImmuniWeb Competitors

Veracode vs Invicti

Compared 9% of the time

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

Snyk vs Invicti

Compared 4% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ImmuniWeb

April 2026

Download ImmuniWeb product report

Buyer's Guide

Invicti

April 2026

Download Invicti product report

Also Known As

No data available

Netsparker

Overview

ImmuniWeb offers comprehensive cybersecurity solutions with features like extensive asset discovery, AI-driven penetration testing, and Dark Web monitoring. Known for its automated service and customer satisfaction, it facilitates seamless integration with single sign-on and provides detailed reporting functionality.

Focusing on asset discovery across websites, clouds, and networks, ImmuniWeb implements AI-driven penetration testing and vulnerability detection with zero false-positives SLA. Its advanced Dark Web monitoring and efficient threat mitigation enhance cybersecurity posture. Customers benefit from its automated continuous discovery, single sign-on integration, and user-friendly dashboards. ImmuniWeb provides robust vulnerability detection and efficient remediation processes, aiming to enhance customer satisfaction within English-speaking markets.

What are the key features of ImmuniWeb?

Comprehensive Asset Discovery: Identifies assets across websites, clouds, and networks efficiently.
AI-Driven Penetration Testing: Offers testing with zero false-positives SLA for trustworthiness.
Dark Web Monitoring: Detects threats and data leaks from the Dark Web.
Automated Continuous Discovery: Ensures up-to-date information on IT assets.
Single Sign-On Integration: Simplifies access for users.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Frictionless Service: Eases access to security management tools.
Detailed Reporting: Helps make informed decisions with well-organized reports.
Efficient Remediation: Speeds up the threat mitigation process.
Seamless Client Access: Facilitates access to dashboards for clear insights.

ImmuniWeb is widely implemented in industries focusing on IT asset management, penetration testing, and vulnerability assessments. Its features cater to fast, detailed on-demand testing while monitoring external surfaces for brand risks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for patch verification, perimeter discovery, and dark web searches to fortify defenses against data leaks and impersonation threats. By enabling efficient collaboration among teams, ImmuniWeb helps tackle urgent cybersecurity challenges and analyze complex logs.

ImmuniWeb

Invicti offers advanced web application security testing focused on identifying vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site scripting. Its Proof-Based Scanning minimizes false positives and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, making it an effective tool for enterprise environments.

Invicti provides comprehensive scanning capabilities that include detecting and verifying critical vulnerabilities and security data consolidation. Its scalable scanning engine and robust API support allow for flexible testing across diverse environments, including web and API testing. Despite some drawbacks like limited single sign-on integration and slow scanning speeds for large applications, Invicti remains a popular choice for automating security assessments, ensuring compliance with standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, and GDPR.

What are the key features of Invicti?

Comprehensive Vulnerability Scanning: Detects vulnerabilities like SQL injection and XSS.
Proof-Based Scanning: Confirms exploitability and reduces false positives.
CI/CD Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development pipelines.
Security Data Consolidation: Centralizes data for better insights.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy analysis and reporting.
Scalable Scanning Engine: Supports testing in enterprise environments.
Robust API Support: Enhances flexibility in testing.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Proactive Security: Actively identifies and verifies vulnerabilities to prevent breaches.
Regulatory Compliance: Helps maintain compliance with standards like PCI DSS and GDPR.
Efficient Vulnerability Management: Aids in prioritizing remediation efforts.
Integration Capabilities: Streamlines processes with CI/CD pipeline compatibility.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, Invicti is implemented to bolster security through automated vulnerability assessments. Its ability to provide insightful reports and remediation suggestions assists companies in efficiently managing security risks and achieving compliance with critical regulatory standards.

Invicti

Sample Customers

Ebay, United Nations, Next Bank Credit Agricole, Geneva Swiss Bank, Banca Stato, Celgene, SIM University, Heymarket, Swissquote, more...

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank

Buyer's Guide

ImmuniWeb vs. Invicti

April 2026

Free Report: ImmuniWeb vs. Invicti

Find out what your peers are saying about ImmuniWeb vs. Invicti and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ImmuniWeb vs. Invicti report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.