We performed a comparison between Inflectra Rapise and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."
"It's pretty straightforward to set up."
"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."
"The testing solution produces the best web applications."
"The solution is very flexible; there are different ways of using it. It's open-source and has a lot of support on offer."
"The ability to present your tests on a wiki page and hooking them up to the scripts/fixtures."
"The initial setup is straightforward. Deployment took about seven months."
"It is programming language agnostic, you can write tests in most currently used languages."
"I have found using IDE and Cucumber framework is good."
"It's not too complicated to implement."
"It supports most of the actions that a user would do on a website."
"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."
"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."
"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."
"The solution does not offer up enough information in regards to personality testing."
"If they can integrate more recording features, like UFT, it would be helpful for automation, but it's not necessary. They can also add a few more reporting features for advanced reporting."
"The drawback is the solution is not easy to learn."
"Could have additional readability and abstraction."
"They should add more functionality to the solution."
"There should be standardized frameworks to build automation."
"One drawback to Selenium is that there is nothing like an object repository, such as that found in QTP, especially considering continuous integration practices that have become common nowadays."
"Selenium HQ can be complex. The interface requires a QA engineer or an expert to use it."
Inflectra Rapise is ranked 22nd in Test Automation Tools with 7 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 4th in Regression Testing Tools with 103 reviews. Inflectra Rapise is rated 7.2, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Inflectra Rapise writes "The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Easy to use with great pricing and lots of documentation". Inflectra Rapise is most compared with Katalon Studio, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and Automation Anywhere (AA). See our Inflectra Rapise vs. Selenium HQ report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.