InfluxDB vs Oracle NoSQL comparison

Why PeerSpot?

InfluxData and Oracle are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. InfluxData is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle is ranked #16 with an average rating of 6.0. InfluxData holds a 5.2% mindshare in ND, compared to Oracle’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of InfluxData users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

InfluxDB

Read 20 InfluxDB reviews

7,127 Views
1,639 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle NoSQL

Read 8 Oracle NoSQL reviews

1,423 Views
1,352 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

InfluxDB

Oracle NoSQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

InfluxDB and Oracle NoSQL compete in the database management space. InfluxDB is seen as more cost-effective with strong customer support, while Oracle NoSQL is recognized for its robust features that justify its higher cost.

Features: InfluxDB efficiently handles high-volume time-series data due to its powerful querying capabilities. It integrates well with various tools and offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies data visualization. Oracle NoSQL provides a flexible data model and strong ACID compliance, making it suitable for complex transactions. Its high availability, seamless integration with Oracle Database, and robust data retrieval capabilities are significant benefits.

Room for Improvement: InfluxDB could enhance its documentation for better user guidance and expand its plugin ecosystem to offer broader integration options. An improved continuous query feature could also benefit users. Oracle NoSQL might work on simplifying its deployment process, bettering scalability without impacting performance, and offering more intuitive management tools to reduce complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: InfluxDB provides straightforward deployment options with responsive customer support, making the setup process smooth. Oracle NoSQL, although more complex due to its feature set, benefits from comprehensive documentation and strong support, helping users navigate its capabilities effectively.

Pricing and ROI: InfluxDB offers competitive pricing, which translates to a good ROI, particularly for businesses focused on time-series data analytics. Oracle NoSQL, despite a higher upfront cost, delivers substantial ROI in environments needing advanced scalability and integration features. This positions InfluxDB as a more cost-effective choice for specific analytics tasks, whereas Oracle NoSQL offers greater value in extensive and feature-rich deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed InfluxDB vs. Oracle NoSQL Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB vs. Oracle NoSQL

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 911,473 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

InfluxDB

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Relational Databases (1st), Open Source Databases (6th), Network Monitoring Software (14th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (12th)

Oracle NoSQL

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of InfluxDB is 5.2%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle NoSQL is 3.9%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
InfluxDB	5.2%
Oracle NoSQL	3.9%
Other	90.9%

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

Time series data has been managed efficiently for IoT sensors but reporting still needs improvement

How InfluxDB can be improved is relevant since for Energy Box, we face certain issues. We have customers worldwide, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe, but when we expanded to China two years ago, they indicated that they do not support the cloud version there. Our application is built on the cloud, which required us to create a separate application for Azure China, which was painful for us. The second issue involves frequent version changes. For example, we started with version one, transitioned to version two, and I heard they are considering InfluxDB version three, reverting to earlier practices. InfluxDB should improve without completely changing its approach. Now we have to redo our work for InfluxDB version three. Regarding needed improvements, the documentation is sufficient, but pricing presents a challenge. InfluxDB has standard pricing, which is acceptable for large companies. However, for startups in our position, they should provide special discounts so everyone can utilize it. The pricing should adapt as companies grow, which is a reasonable expectation.

Read full review

Susantha Kumar

Support on banking at Aithent

Handles large data volumes effectively but connection issues require attention

The Oracle NoSQL solution is used primarily for storing data for our web applications. We work alongside the DBA team for this purpose, given that specific departments manage aspects of its use. We choose it specifically to handle large scales of data, such as in one of our bank customer's scenarios using more than nine hundred gigabytes of data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"While I would rate InfluxDB a ten on a scale of one to ten, users should be thoughtful about matching the engine to their specific needs."

"It helps me maintain my solution easily because it is very reliable, so we didn't face any performance issues or crashes regarding our queries; we can get the results very fast."

"InfluxDB works as expected with excellent scalability and stability, which is critical for our application."

"The most valuable features are aggregating the data and integration with Graphana for monitoring."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is we can use InfluxDB to integrate with and plug into any other tools."

"The platform operates very quickly. It is easy to configure, connect, and query and integrates seamlessly with Grafana."

"Prior to InfluxDB usage, real-time data was not visualized and monitored, and after the introduction of InfluxDB in the entire framework, the organization is benefiting a lot in terms of monitoring and understanding performance data in real-time."

"InfluxDB's best feature is that it's a cloud offering. Other good features include its time-series DB, fast time-bulk queries, and window operations."

More InfluxDB pros

"The features I've found to be most valuable are the speed of reading and writing (read/write performance levels are really high), the transactions model (semantics for data manipulation), and just the overall simplicity of using it."

"Try it! You’ll be impressed."

"With Oracle NoSQL, our clients have a highly scalable, simple to set up database that performs very well when data is organized correctly from the beginning."

"Oracle NoSQL is pretty scalable."

"So far, we find stability to be very reasonable, it is dependable and we do not have any big issues."

"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."

"NoSQL has high availability; I think it's perfect from a technical perspective, and it's quick to run and go."

"The tool is easy to learn."

More Oracle NoSQL pros

Cons

"The solution's UI can be more user-friendly."

"The error logging capability can be improved because the logs are not very informative."

"InfluxDB can be improved in several ways. The Flux query language needs to be learned, but if there were something similar to SQL or previous options, it would be much easier for users without imposing a learning curve."

"One area for improvement is the querying language. InfluxDB deprecated FluxQL, which was intuitive since developers are already familiar with standard querying."

"InfluxDB is generally stable, but we've encountered issues with the configuration file in our ticket stack. For instance, a mistake in one of the metrics out of a hundred KPIs can disrupt data collection for all KPIs. This happens because the agent stops working if there's an issue with any configuration part. To address this, it is essential to ensure that all configurations are part of the agent's EXE file when provided. This makes it easier to package the agent for server installation and ensures all KPIs are available from the server. Additionally, the agent cannot encrypt and decrypt passwords for authentication, which can be problematic when monitoring URLs or requiring authentication tokens. This requires additional scripting and can prolong service restart times."

"The solution doesn't have much of a user interface."

"I haven't seen a return on investment; unfortunately, I cannot share relevant metrics such as time saved, fewer employees needed, or money saved."

"However, I cannot ignore the challenges I faced while configuring the database with my message brokers, whether Rabbit or Kafka, because the documentation is not properly provided."

More InfluxDB cons

"Personally, I’d like to see some improvements in the monitoring UI for it."

"You will get high performance when you organize your data correctly at the beginning. Otherwise, there are instability issues."

"I would rate Oracle NoSQL six or 6.5 out of ten based on my experience."

"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."

"The main areas that need improvement with NoSQL are in the area of big data and user-friendly presentation."

"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."

"We've had some issues with stability. During our testing, we were able to drop an entire database by writing huge amounts of data."

"Focusing on making the administration easier compared to other solutions like MongoDB could be beneficial. Simplifying the administrative tasks could enhance the user experience."

More Oracle NoSQL cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"InfluxDB is open-source, but there are additional costs for scaling."

"We are using the open-source version of InfluxDB."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"The product is expensive and Oracle could work to lower the licensing cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

911,473 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with InfluxDB?

If the dashboarding facility can be improved in terms of the visualization parameters and the amount of support available from the community, as well as having smarter alerts to send those alerts t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for InfluxDB?

My main use case for InfluxDB is to inject all my performance data and visualize it as a data source into Grafana. My data comes from JMeter from a plugin, which is inserting data to InfluxDB, and ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering InfluxDB?

It is good to start with InfluxDB to stabilize your data, visualize your data, and have the data stored on a time-series basis. I would recommend everyone to get into InfluxDB and start using it. T...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle NoSQL?

We use the enterprise edition of Oracle NoSQL.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle NoSQL?

Sometimes we face problems with the connection between our applications and the database. It may be due to network issues or performance issues on Oracle's side. Our DBA team requests validations f...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle NoSQL?

We use Oracle NoSQL ( /products/oracle-nosql-reviews ) to store data for our web applications. It is being used for customer projects, and we handle one of our bank customers using more than nine h...

See all answers

Comparisons

PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 7% of the time

MySQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

SQLite vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

ClickHouse vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

More InfluxDB Competitors

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 20% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 14% of the time

Cassandra vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon QLDB vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 11% of the time

Aerospike Database vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 5% of the time

More Oracle NoSQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB

August 2026

Download InfluxDB product report

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

August 2026

Download Oracle NoSQL product report

Overview

InfluxDB offers efficient time series data handling with fast writes, optimized storage, and seamless Grafana integration, making it ideal for high-volume applications like crypto trading and real-time monitoring. Its SQL-like query language and cloud-based options enhance user experience and system scalability.

InfluxDB stands out with its ability to handle high-volume time series data efficiently, thanks to fast data writes and efficient compression. It is highly scalable, providing clustering features for improved performance management. Integration with Grafana enhances visualization, making it easier to analyze complex data through a user-friendly SQL-like query language. Real-time monitoring, historical data access, and proactive alerts enhance system reliability. Its cloud offering simplifies maintenance and operations, making it attractive for users seeking an efficient time series database.

What are the key features of InfluxDB?

Fast Data Writes: Ensures quick data handling necessary for real-time applications.
Optimized Storage: Reduces space requirements and improves performance.
Efficient Compression: Supports high-volume data like time series, enhancing throughput.
Grafana Integration: Supports seamless visualization and analysis of data.
SQL-like Query Language: Simplifies complex data operations with user-friendly queries.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Performance: Fast processing and optimized storage for better application responsiveness.
Scalability: Clustering features ensure adaptability to growing data volumes.
Improved Reliability: Proactive alerts and real-time monitoring prevent system downtimes.
Ease of Use: SQL-like language and intuitive visuals improve user accessibility.

InfluxDB is applied extensively in industries handling high-volume data needs. For sensor data storage in production environments, it offers reliable performance. Its role in server management metrics and performance monitoring is crucial for maintaining optimal operations. In crypto market data collection, it supports fast-paced trading environments. Industries use it for real-time tracking, like maritime vessel monitoring, leveraging its rapid data handling and visualization capabilities. Its applications also extend to IoT environments, API performance tracking, HVAC systems, and log aggregation, often integrating with Prometheus, Docker, and AWS to enhance system capabilities.

InfluxData

Oracle NoSQL is known for its distributed architecture, which ensures scalability and high availability, making it ideal for handling substantial data across diverse applications.

Oracle NoSQL leverages its distributed nature to offer automatic load balancing and powerful schema evolution tools. With features such as a Java table API and seamless integration with Oracle Database, it efficiently manages unstructured data and supports high read/write operations. Departments dealing with large-scale data benefit from fast data retrieval and effective data replication, with support agreements facilitating easy management.

What are Oracle NoSQL's key features?

Distributed Architecture: Ensures data availability and scalability.
Automatic Load Balancing: Distributes workloads evenly across servers.
Table API for Java: Facilitates integration with Java applications.
Powerful Schema Evolution: Allows changes without downtime.
Efficient Data Replication: Supports high availability and disaster recovery.

What benefits should users expect?

High Performance: Fast data retrieval for large datasets.
Seamless Integration: Compatibility with Oracle Database enhances usability.
Easy Data Management: Simplifies handling of unstructured data.
Scalability: Supports future data growth effortlessly.

In telecom solutions, Oracle NoSQL helps store structured data and logs, supporting relational databases. It plays a crucial role in banking by managing over 900 gigabytes of data, facilitating data fetching and updates efficiently. Its implementation across infrastructure and web applications highlights its robustness in varied use cases.

Oracle

Sample Customers

ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo

Airbus, Globacom, WebAction

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB vs. Oracle NoSQL

August 2026

Free Report: InfluxDB vs. Oracle NoSQL

Find out what your peers are saying about InfluxDB vs. Oracle NoSQL and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

911,473 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our InfluxDB vs. Oracle NoSQL report.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.