Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Infobright DB vs MySQL comparison

Ignite Technologies and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Ignite Technologies is ranked #34, while Oracle is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5. Ignite Technologies holds a 0.2% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 8.5% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Ignite Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle users who would recommend it.
Infobright DB
Read 10 Infobright DB reviews
  • 181 Views
  • 118 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
MySQL
Read 148 MySQL reviews
  • 7,825 Views
  • 6,096 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Infobright DB and MySQL are direct competitors in the database market. MySQL is often considered superior due to its broad feature set and adaptability across diverse applications.

Features: Infobright DB is known for its columnar storage engine, data compression, and ability to efficiently handle large-scale analytics. It also allows the use of SQL language for queries. MySQL excels with a multi-threaded architecture, ACID compliance, and extensive compatibility with LAMP/WAMP stacks.

Room for Improvement: Infobright DB could improve in deployment simplicity and expanding community support. MySQL might enhance its scalability and performance in handling very large datasets while also refining its replication features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MySQL is lauded for easy deployment and a strong community support network. Conversely, Infobright DB has a more complex deployment but serves specialized analytics needs effectively, often requiring expert guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Infobright DB involves higher initial costs due to its analytics focus, yielding high ROI for data-intensive uses. MySQL offers a cost-effective structure, particularly with its open-source version, enabling broader use and better ROI for transactional applications.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Infobright DB vs. MySQL Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Infobright DB vs. MySQL
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 842,194 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Infobright DB
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
34th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Data Warehouse (27th)
MySQL
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
148
Ranking in other categories
Open Source Databases (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Infobright DB is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MySQL is 8.5%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Relational Databases Tools
 

Featured Reviews

SD
If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record.
This version of Infobright has zero support for distributed scalability. The internal smart grid employed for each table has a major flaw in that the data size cannot be expunged until 2GB of data is reached at the column-level. This is a major flaw, making usage in a big-data scenario impossible. This means that you can delete as many records from a database table as you want. However, unless the 2GB aggregate size threshold was reached for some of the columns in the table, no reduction in disk space usage will occur. Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk. I spent countless hours trying to find some workaround for this. I have nightmares of my e-mail inbox full of unsolvable questions about data size reduction from our field engineers.
Read full review
Muzzamil Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
Native encryption ensures secure data management with a simple deployment
The most valuable feature is the on-premises data encryption facilities. By default, we can provide encryption, and this feature in MySQL is why we prefer it over other databases. The native encryption in MySQL encourages us to use this database model more frequently compared to Oracle and other databases. With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment. It perfectly supports our ROI, and we have no issues with its functionality.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows"
"This specific version of this MySQL has been battle tested for a long time. Any issues are known issues and we pretty much don't have any problems when they're in production. So it's very stable."
"MySQL is an easy-to-use solution that provides stability, reliability, flexibility, performance, security, and high availability."
"Fully scalable and stable SQL-based RDBMS, with a straightforward and easy setup."
"The ML modules in MySQL are advantageous since they make data handling easy and quick at MNQM."
"The solution is free to use, which is its most valuable aspect."
"It is free, which is probably its most valuable feature. It is a pretty full-featured relational database. It really does everything we need it to do."
"It creates a unified view of the entire architecture and performance factor, helping to manage the network more easily."
"This is a lightweight product that is not demanding on the resources, which is what I think gives it the edge."
More MySQL pros
 

Cons

"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."
"Integration is a key feature in need of improvement."
"Improvements are required in character set support, scalability, and big data sets."
"The solution could improve by having better performance and security."
"I find the Microsoft solution a bit better. But mostly in terms of the UI layout, I would say. I just find it a little bit more efficient."
"Scalability could be improved."
"In MySQL, we need to define every table beforehand."
"The solution could improve the monitoring. At the present time, you need to use third-party monitoring solutions."
"Its scalability can be better. It is probably not as scalable as Oracle. I had some issues with connectors. I used it from a C++ program, and it required some work to make it run, but finally, it worked."
More MySQL cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for."
"It is free. It is an open-source platform."
"I rate the solution's pricing as four out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. For our basic needs, it's quite affordable. However, the cost increases when we need to scale up or require high availability. Our developer team of about 600 people uses MySQL without much issue. The pricing becomes more of a concern on the business side, as we have more end users and need constant database availability and scaling. In those cases, the solution gets a bit more expensive, even though it provides good value for the business."
"I would rate the solution’s pricing a six out of ten. The solution is not cheap but it’s a fair value. The pricing depends on the use cases of our customers. Some of our customers use the community edition which is license free and a good fit for their use cases. However, we encourage our bigger customers to sign up because of the scalability issues. The paid versions get direct technical support from Oracle."
"MySQL is very cheap. It could be free. It also has a yearly licensing option."
"The tool is open source."
"MySQL Enterprise Support is not cheap, though might still be cheaper than Oracle or SQL Server. They may not have local support depending on where you’re based, but there are many smaller agencies out there that will readily provide support. You’ll need to spend some time looking around."
"The pricing falls within the moderate range."
"MySQL is a free and open-source solution."
More MySQL pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
842,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?
MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...
See all answers
Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?
I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...
See all answers
What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?
One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Firebird SQL vs MySQL Logo
Firebird SQL vs MySQL
Compared 28% of the time
PostgreSQL vs MySQL Logo
PostgreSQL vs MySQL
Compared 16% of the time
SAP HANA vs MySQL Logo
SAP HANA vs MySQL
Compared 9% of the time
MariaDB vs MySQL Logo
MariaDB vs MySQL
Compared 6% of the time
Teradata vs MySQL Logo
Teradata vs MySQL
Compared 6% of the time
More MySQL Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Infobright DB
March 2025
Infobright DB reportDownload Infobright DB product report
Buyer's Guide
MySQL
March 2025
MySQL reportDownload MySQL product report
 

Also Known As

Infobright
No data available
 

Overview

Infobright's high performance analytic database is designed for analyzing large volumes of machine-generated data

Ignite Technologies

MySQL is a cost-efficient and scalable relational database management system widely used in web, mobile applications, and academic projects.

MySQL is utilized for backend operations, data analysis, reporting, financial transactions, and ERP databases. It supports deployment on local servers, Cloud, and Kubernetes. Its free, open-source nature along with strong community support make it popular among companies. MySQL's compatibility with multiple platforms and programming languages enhances its appeal. While it remains stable and easy to use, areas such as replication, clustering, and backup require improvement to better serve enterprise applications. Enhanced security, error messages, and monitoring tools are also desired for a better user experience.

What are the most important features of MySQL?
  • Free and Open-Source: No licensing costs, perfect for budget-conscious projects.
  • Compatibility: Works with multiple platforms and programming languages.
  • High Performance: Efficient performance across large datasets.
  • Scalability: Easily scales to meet growing business needs.
  • Clustering and Replication: Ensures data availability and redundancy.
  • Easy Installation: Quick setup process on various operating systems.
  • Community Support: Extensive resources and community assistance.
  • Cross-Platform: Operates seamlessly on different operating systems.
  • Data Management Interface: Simplifies data handling and manipulation.
What are the benefits of using MySQL?
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduce expenses with a free, open-source database.
  • Scalability: Adapt to increasing data demands effortlessly.
  • Performance: Handle large datasets with ease and speed.
  • Community Support: Access a vast pool of knowledge and resources.
  • Flexibility: Integrate with various platforms and languages for diverse use cases.
  • Data Reliability: Clustering and replication for high data availability.

In multiple industries, MySQL supports internal applications, billing systems, academic teaching purposes, and ERP databases. Companies leverage MySQL for Cloud and local deployments, ensuring effective data manipulation and backend operations in diverse projects. Its role in financial transactions and reporting further emphasizes its versatility.

Oracle
 

Sample Customers

REZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, Bango
Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.
Buyer's Guide
Infobright DB vs. MySQL
March 2025
Free Report: Infobright DB vs. MySQL
Find out what your peers are saying about Infobright DB vs. MySQL and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
842,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Infobright DB vs. MySQL report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.