Infobright DB vs Oracle Java DB comparison

Ignite Technologies and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Ignite Technologies is ranked #37, while Oracle is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0. Ignite Technologies holds a 0.2% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Ignite Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Infobright DB

Read 10 Infobright DB reviews

172 Views
110 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Oracle Java DB

Read 9 Oracle Java DB reviews

540 Views
421 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Infobright DB

Oracle Java DB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Infobright DB and Oracle Java DB are key players in the database management space, with each having unique strengths. Oracle Java DB often has the upper hand due to its extensive features and integration with Java applications.

Features: Infobright DB delivers outstanding analytical query performance, data compression, and efficient storage usage, which are pivotal for big data environments. Oracle Java DB excels in distributed database management, scalability, and deep integration with Java, making it suitable for complex enterprise applications.

Room for Improvement: Infobright DB could improve its scalability and integration capabilities to better handle diverse data environments. It may also benefit from enhanced support for distributed databases and real-time processing. Oracle Java DB could enhance its data compression techniques and simplify certain complex operations. Improvements in user interface design and better resource management may also enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Infobright DB is renowned for its straightforward deployment and user-friendly setup, ideal for organizations with limited database management resources. On the other hand, Oracle Java DB provides comprehensive integration with existing Java environments and robust customer service, facilitating smooth operational transitions for enterprises.

Pricing and ROI: Infobright DB offers competitive pricing with minimal setup costs, appealing to cost-conscious organizations seeking effective data management solutions. Although Oracle Java DB incurs higher initial expenditures, its scalability and comprehensive feature set provide a substantial return on investment over time, positioning it as a strategic asset for larger enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Infobright DB vs. Oracle Java DB Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Infobright DB vs. Oracle Java DB

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infobright DB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

37th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Warehouse (27th)

Oracle Java DB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Infobright DB is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Java DB is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Steve Dodge

Senior System Architect - Resiliency Engineering at AT&T

If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record.

This version of Infobright has zero support for distributed scalability. The internal smart grid employed for each table has a major flaw in that the data size cannot be expunged until 2GB of data is reached at the column-level. This is a major flaw, making usage in a big-data scenario impossible. This means that you can delete as many records from a database table as you want. However, unless the 2GB aggregate size threshold was reached for some of the columns in the table, no reduction in disk space usage will occur. Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk. I spent countless hours trying to find some workaround for this. I have nightmares of my e-mail inbox full of unsolvable questions about data size reduction from our field engineers.

Read full review

Anil-Sinha

Senior Consultant at CGI

Able to process all the reporting and processing in the database itself

We have been upgrading and moving to new environments. I was involved in the solution's initial setup. Some things in the setup are very smooth sailing. However, some setups become complicated because what they set up doesn't meet your needs. So, some tweaking is necessary in certain instances. Having a good understanding of the tool really helps. Oracle Java DB is easy to deploy if it's a new setup. Migrating from an old environment to a new environment takes time because you need the old functionality. A first-time deployment of the application is easy. We just did a default setup and started using it. When we have to migrate, there is too much baggage behind that application, especially from the security point of view.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows"

"The solution is stable."

"It's very clever."

"The database is quite robust in terms of performance from the SQL side."

"The valuable features include connecting to the database and retrieving data."

"There have been no issues in relation to stability. We've never really had do to any recoveries. It is very stable."

"The most valuable feature is automation."

"The additional value of having Java inside the Oracle database is all the security that is applied to an Oracle database will be enforced on Java's stored procedures as well."

"Able to write queries more efficiently and the management of data has become better and easier."

More Oracle Java DB pros

Cons

"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."

"The biggest lesson that I have learned from using Oracle products is vendor lock-in."

"Oracle can improve by providing more connection string variations and relay servers on the path to the database."

"Needs improvement in consistency issues with respect to timeframes."

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

"The tool might be integrated, but we see performance issues because of overhead."

"In terms of improvement, I'd like an automation tool that is lower priced. The core prices are very high."

"It'll be better if Oracle Java supports open source technologies, like Node.js."

"The solution should continue to keep updating and improving the Java language."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for."

"The product's pricing is very friendly, with no extra costs after the licensing fees."

"Oracle Java DB is a pricey solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Educational Organization

12%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Oracle Java DB?

Oracle can improve by providing more connection string variations and relay servers on the path to the database. Various ways of connecting would enhance functionality.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Java DB?

I have experience connecting to a database with Java by using Java code and interrogating the database.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Java DB?

It's important to consider several settings and connection strings, as well as firewall rules when connecting to the database. I would rate the overall solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

MySQL vs Oracle Java DB

Compared 52% of the time

Oracle Database vs Oracle Java DB

Compared 31% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Oracle Java DB

Compared 17% of the time

More Oracle Java DB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infobright DB

April 2025

Download Infobright DB product report

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

March 2025

Download Oracle Java DB product report

Also Known As

Infobright

No data available

Overview

Infobright's high performance analytic database is designed for analyzing large volumes of machine-generated data

Ignite Technologies

Java DB is a relational database management system (RDBMS). Data is stored and queried via SQL or JDBC. Like other RDBMSs, Java DB can also be accessed through a persistence layer such as JPA, Hibernate, or JDO. Java objects can be stored in the columns of Java DB tables.

Oracle

Sample Customers

REZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, Bango

Université Nice Sophia Antipolis

Buyer's Guide

Infobright DB vs. Oracle Java DB

April 2025

Free Report: Infobright DB vs. Oracle Java DB

Find out what your peers are saying about Infobright DB vs. Oracle Java DB and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infobright DB vs. Oracle Java DB report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.