Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs Syniti Data Quality comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Informatica Cloud Data Quality
Ranking in Data Quality
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Syniti Data Quality
Ranking in Data Quality
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Data Quality category, the mindshare of Informatica Cloud Data Quality is 3.0%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Syniti Data Quality is 20.7%, up from 11.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Quality
 

Featured Reviews

TaherDungrawala - PeerSpot reviewer
Has good reusability and CDI features
I use Collibra Data Quality. I switched to Informatica because Collibra cannot integrate. Colibra Cloud Data Quality is a very basic tool. There is no integration capability. If you have problem records, there is no fix to remediate them using the same tool. With Informatica, you can integrate with CDI and then create a remediation plan.
GY
A highly stable solution that can be deployed very quickly and easily
You can only see the data and get the error report in SAP Information Steward. So, it is a read-only thing in SAP Information Steward. If you are using Syniti Data Quality, you can see the error and fix it by directly configuring Syniti Data Quality to write back to SAP. Syniti Data Quality allows you to update the source system. In SAP Information Steward, you can't upgrade the source system. You can just see the data and go on to the source system manually by logging in to SAP, and then you have to fix those errors. With Syniti Data Quality, you can integrate SAP and directly fix errors from Syniti Data Quality instead of logging into SAP and then fixing them.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We primarily used Cloud Data Profiling to connect with Cloud Data Governance, a tool also used by Teva. This integration allowed users to access data quality results within the data governance catalog."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Server maintenance, server hosting, backup, restoration, and DB capabilities are not needed in the cloud."
"The most beneficial feature of Informatica Cloud Data Quality is it's cloud-based."
"The reusability factors are nice. The Cloud Data Quality is much better. A major flaw in the previous version was integration with the catalog, which is now seamless."
"Initial setup was fairly easy."
"The most valuable feature is the rule specification."
"An advantage is its seamless integration with other Informatica capabilities, making data quality a deeply embedded part of the solution."
"The customer service and support is good."
"Syniti has built-in 80% of the solution, and we only need to customize 20 to 25% of the features. It is easy to run and pre-load reports."
"The major benefits of Syniti Data Quality stem from the productivity and flexibility it offers to users."
"With Syniti Data Quality, you can integrate SAP and directly fix errors from Syniti Data Quality instead of logging into SAP and then fixing them."
 

Cons

"Logical views are a little bit behind in comparison to the on-premise version."
"I used to use this tool more but recently we have been using another tool that we feel is better because it handles spatial data. Informatica Cloud Data Quality could improve by adding the ability to handle spatial data."
"The integration with older technology and cloud quality needs improvement."
"In the on-premises version, features like web service consumer and web service provider are available, but these functionalities are currently unavailable in the cloud edition."
"Informatica Cloud Data Quality could improve by adding more algorithms for matching and mastering. We currently only have five or six. Additionally, the parallelism in data is better in other solutions, such as IBM."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Support response time could be better."
"Some capabilities from the cloud version are not included in the on-premises version."
"The loading mechanisms and administration processes, particularly in setting up connections and deploying the system, need improvement."
"The customization of the data needs improvement. We need to build basic SQL queries rather than being able to do it within the tool. We need to be able to analyze the SQL queries and then rerun them based on customer usage."
"In Syniti Data Quality, data extraction is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"It would be good if Syniti Data Quality could integrate more AI in the future."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay for a yearly subscription."
"Informatica Cloud Data Quality is a costly solution."
"The licensing costs attached to the solution are pretty high, but then, with the cloud model, the prices depend on what it provides for the value of money, which I feel was very high."
"The solution is expensive."
"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Logistics Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
22%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Retailer
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Informatica Cloud Data Quality?
The profiling features are much better than the on-premise version.
What needs improvement with Informatica Cloud Data Quality?
Accessing data as a service is essential, especially for validations requiring external data services. This goes beyond basic syntactic checks, like ensuring an email address contains the @ symbol ...
What is your primary use case for Informatica Cloud Data Quality?
We use the solution to validate emails, telephone numbers, and postal codes. It can also create some data quality rules using the Cloud app's data quality function.
What do you like most about Syniti Data Quality?
The customer service and support is good.
What needs improvement with Syniti Data Quality?
The loading mechanisms and administration processes, particularly in setting up connections and deploying the system, need improvement.
What is your primary use case for Syniti Data Quality?
Syniti Data Quality's use case is similar to what we do in SAP Information Steward. You can create a data quality report and your business Steward, which is more into cleansing the data. They will ...
 

Also Known As

Cloud Data Quality Radar
Syniti DQ
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Freddie Mac, Rabobank
Kraft Foods, Puget Sound Energy
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs. Syniti Data Quality and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.