OpenText Application Quality Management vs Tricentis LiveCompare comparison

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while Tricentis is ranked #29. OpenText holds a 4.6% mindshare in ALM, compared to Tricentis’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

OpenText Application Qualit...

Read 209 OpenText Application Quality Management reviews

5,872 Views
3,523 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Tricentis LiveCompare

Read 1 Tricentis LiveCompare review

455 Views
250 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Application Qualit...

Tricentis LiveCompare

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

OpenText Application Quality Management and Tricentis LiveCompare are competing solutions in software testing and quality management. Tricentis LiveCompare appears more comprehensive in features, while OpenText shows strength in pricing and customer service.

Features: OpenText Application Quality Management offers comprehensive test management capabilities and integrates well with other OpenText solutions, providing a unified approach. It also facilitates effective test planning and execution. Tricentis LiveCompare stands out with advanced analytics and impact analysis, prioritizing testing efforts efficiently. Furthermore, it enhances test optimization and offers intelligent insights for informed decision-making.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides a straightforward deployment process and robust customer support, easing the onboarding process and issue resolution for teams. Tricentis LiveCompare, while offering sophisticated deployment options, requires more initial setup complexity but is backed by strong customer service, ensuring user support throughout the process.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Application Quality Management is noted for competitive pricing and a strong return on investment with lower upfront expenses. Though Tricentis LiveCompare has a higher price tag, it justifies the cost with an advanced feature set that offers long-term benefits in testing efficiency and risk reduction, promising greater long-term savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,036 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Application Qualit...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

209

Ranking in other categories

Quality Management Software (1st), Test Management Tools (1st)

Tricentis LiveCompare

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

29th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SAP Service Providers (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 4.6%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis LiveCompare is 0.9%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management	4.6%
Tricentis LiveCompare	0.9%
Other	94.5%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

BRIANJOHNSON2

Independant Consultant at Reckitt

Test management has standardized our programs but reporting remains manual and time consuming

Test management helps to streamline the quality assurance process through the process I put in place on how to use the tool. The tool is just a conduit. It is the process that I put in place that the team follows that drives the testing in the tool. Regarding real-time tracking and reporting and how it helps enhance project management within my organization, the reporting is still awful. We normally do a lot of manual reporting. It always has been awful and always will be awful until they actually bolt on a reporting tool that I can quickly pull out. It is not there, and it is awful. The reporting part is definitely something to improve.

Read full review

it_user713811

Product Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Accurately identifies what will be affected in production after a change or upgrade

The LiveCompare apps that my customers and I have benefitted from the most are analyses and reports on the following: * Upgrades – LiveCompare's Impact Analysis functionality accurately identifies what will be affected in production as the result of a change or an upgrade. It can also pinpoint accurately the scope of testing needed in anticipation of an upgrade. * Migration to SAP Hana – LiveCompare's unique reporting and advanced analytics streamline the entire migration process to SAP Hana, while minimizing costs, risk, and time. * SAP License management optimization. * Custom code analytics – Includes usage monitoring, quality and performance monitoring, Java analysis, and ABAP code quality. * Testing - LiveCompare optimizes the entire testing phase in upgrade projects.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From reporting to team management, everything is better now."

"The ability to integrate this solution with other applications is helpful. If there is automation, it comes with improved quality and speed."

"The tools could be useful if we were utilizing them more effectively"

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is the alignment of the test to the execution and the linking of the defects to the two. It automatically links any issues you have to the test."

"Having used the tool before, I like the use of parameters, being able to do exports and reports of the data for monitoring of executions, and the defect management as well. I feel satisfaction in that area."

"This solution is open and very easy to integrate. The interface is good too."

"The most valuable feature is the ST Add-In. It's a Microsoft add-in that makes it much easier to upload test cases into Quality Center."

"ALM Quality Center's best features are the test lab, requirement tab, and report dashboard."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pros

"LiveCompare's Impact Analysis functionality identifies accurately what will be affected in production as the result of a change or an upgrade. It can also pinpoint accurately the scope of testing needed in anticipation of an upgrade."

"LiveCompare's unique reporting and advanced analytics streamline the entire migration process to SAP Hana, while minimizing costs, risk, and time."

Cons

"Micro Focus ALM Quality Center could improve how the automation process works. Addiotnlally, the parallel execution needs to be optimized. For example, if multiple users, which are two or more users, are doing an execution, while we execute the cases, I have seen some issues in the progress."

"ALM only works on Internet Explorer. It doesn't work on any other browser. In my opinion, Internet Explorer is generally a bit slower. I would like to see it work on Chrome or on other browsers."

"The support is not good and the documentation is not consistent."

"It is pricey."

"If they could improve their BPT business components that would be good"

"There are always new features and more support for new and legacy technology architectures with each release. But the bad news is a growing list of long-standing issues with the product rarely gets addressed."

"We operate in Sweden, and there are not so many Swedish people that know the product."

"Certain applications within this solution are not really compatible with certain applications like ERP. The problem is when we're trying to use these applications or devices, the solution itself doesn't scale."

More OpenText Application Quality Management cons

"From my experience with the product, I would suggest adding a feature that would allow a customer who is reviewing the LiveCompare results to be able to connect remotely with one of IntelliCorp's experts (aside from their support) in order to assist the customer to better understand the results."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I feel that the licenses are expensive. "

"ALM Quality Center is a little bit costly."

"The enterprise pricing and licensing are reasonable."

"This is an expensive solution."

"I don't know the exact numbers, but I know it is pricey. When we talked to the sales reps we work with from our company, they say, "Well, Micro Focus will never lose on price." So, they are willing to do a lot of negotiating if it is required."

"We pay around $30,000 for thirty users, translating to approximately $6,000 to $10,000 per user, which is high."

"The solution is priceed high."

"Most vendors offer the same pricing, though some vendors offer a cheaper price for their cloud/SaaS solution versus their on-premise. However, cloud/SaaS solutions result in a loss of freedom. E.g., if you want to make a change, most of the time it needs to be validated by the vendor, then you're being charged an addition fee. Sometimes, even if you are rejected, you are charged because it's a risk to the entire environment."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pricing and cost advice

"IntelliCorp is flexible in terms of licensing and the pricing structure. They are open to discussing a customer's specific requirements."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Performing Arts

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	39
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	162

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 9% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 8% of the time

Rally Software vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors

Deloitte SAP Services vs Tricentis LiveCompare

Compared 47% of the time

SmartShift vs Tricentis LiveCompare

Compared 31% of the time

More Tricentis LiveCompare Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Application Quality Management

January 2026

OpenText Application Quality Management report

Download OpenText Application Quality Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

December 2025

Download Tricentis LiveCompare product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager

No data available

Overview

OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?

Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

OpenText

Tricentis LiveCompare provides advanced analytics and smart automation, enhancing testing efficiency and accuracy for SAP landscapes.

Designed for complex environments, Tricentis LiveCompare specializes in impact analysis, offering real-time insights that minimize risks and enhance decision-making processes in SAP system updates and changes. Its intelligent analytics help identify and prioritize critical test cases, reducing unnecessary tests.

What are the most valuable features of Tricentis LiveCompare?

Impact Analysis: Identifies changed elements to focus on critical areas.
Test Optimization: Reduces test volumes while maintaining quality.
Smart Analytics: Provides actionable insights for informed decisions.
Automation Integration: Seamlessly supports continuous testing frameworks.

What benefits and ROI should users look for when evaluating Tricentis LiveCompare?

Cost Efficiency: Lowers testing costs with targeted approaches.
Time Savings: Accelerates test cycles through optimized processes.
Risk Reduction: Decreases deployment risks with precise impact assessments.
Quality Assurance: Enhances product quality with thorough testing insights.

Tricentis LiveCompare is implemented in industries such as finance and retail where maintaining high system reliability during updates is crucial. Its analytical capabilities support robust testing processes, ensuring operational stability and efficiency across complex SAP systems.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

Coca-Cola, eBay, BP, British American Tobacco, Surrey Country Council, AES, P66, MUD, Bentley Motors, Coats, Hershey, Kimberly Clark

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

December 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.