Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IntelliCorp LiveCompare vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center comparison

IntelliCorp and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. IntelliCorp is ranked #34, while OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2. IntelliCorp holds a 0.1% mindshare in ALM, compared to OpenText’s 5.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IntelliCorp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
IntelliCorp LiveCompare
Read 1 IntelliCorp LiveCompare review
  • 42 Views
  • 27 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Read 205 OpenText ALM / Quality Center reviews
  • 7,554 Views
  • 3,152 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between IntelliCorp LiveCompare and OpenText ALM / Quality Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,562 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.8
OpenText ALM/Quality Center scales well, with stable performance for large user bases, but licensing may affect scalability costs.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.0
OpenText ALM/Quality Center provides comprehensive traceability, integration, scalability, and secure management for lifecycle, test cases, and defects.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the IntelliCorp LiveCompare report
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
It is beneficial for managing testing data and has integration with Excel.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.6
OpenText ALM faces challenges with expensive licenses, outdated UI, limited integration, and performance issues, hindering usability and efficiency.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the IntelliCorp LiveCompare report
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.8
OpenText ALM/Quality Center is stable and reliable, with minor issues often linked to network or hardware constraints.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the IntelliCorp LiveCompare report
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.8
OpenText ALM customer service is inconsistent, with mixed reviews on response times, expertise, and overall service quality.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
OpenText ALM is costly, requiring careful evaluation and negotiation, but global license sharing and SaaS could reduce expenses.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the IntelliCorp LiveCompare report
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText ALM / Quality Center report
 

Categories and Ranking

IntelliCorp LiveCompare
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
34th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
SAP Service Providers (16th)
OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
205
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of IntelliCorp LiveCompare is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText ALM / Quality Center is 5.7%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

it_user713811 - PeerSpot reviewer
Accurately identifies what will be affected in production after a change or upgrade
The LiveCompare apps that my customers and I have benefitted from the most are analyses and reports on the following: * Upgrades – LiveCompare's Impact Analysis functionality accurately identifies what will be affected in production as the result of a change or an upgrade. It can also pinpoint accurately the scope of testing needed in anticipation of an upgrade. * Migration to SAP Hana – LiveCompare's unique reporting and advanced analytics streamline the entire migration process to SAP Hana, while minimizing costs, risk, and time. * SAP License management optimization. * Custom code analytics – Includes usage monitoring, quality and performance monitoring, Java analysis, and ABAP code quality. * Testing - LiveCompare optimizes the entire testing phase in upgrade projects.
Read full review
Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewer
Has an initial setup phase that is easy to manage
The tool has some limitations for the dashboard, especially when it comes to 20 or 25 of them, which is sometimes not enough, and one may have to use a custom Excel to help extend the dashboard. The tool needs improvements since it is an old technology. OpenText ALM / Quality Center's improved version is ALM Octane but it does not support some of the traditional parts of the original product. Some of the traditional parts are missing in a lot of areas of OpenText ALM / Quality Center. It is difficult to directly transfer OpenText ALM / Quality Center to ALM Octane. Some of the classic OEMs have limitations, especially when used in an IDE network. There is a need for the tool to check where changes in UI or UX need to be made. The technology used for UI and UX are not user-friendly.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,562 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
62%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Computer Software Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The most valuable feature is the ST Add-In. It's a Microsoft add-in that makes it much easier to upload test cases into Quality Center.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The cost is a bit high and this could be improved as there are new players with better pricing.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
Costing is an area that needs improvement. It is a bit on the higher side and can be managed better as there are new players with better pricing. Aside from this, there are no other challenges and ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 24% of the time
OpenText ALM Octane vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
OpenText ALM Octane vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 22% of the time
Jira vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
Jira vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 15% of the time
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 9% of the time
OpenText UFT One vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center Logo
OpenText UFT One vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Compared 5% of the time
More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
October 2024
IntelliCorp LiveCompare reportDownload IntelliCorp LiveCompare product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText ALM / Quality Center
November 2024
OpenText ALM / Quality Center reportDownload OpenText ALM / Quality Center product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM
 

Learn More

IntelliCorp
OpenText
 

Overview

IntelliCorp’s smart lifecycle management software – LiveCompare – is the catalyst for change that enables fast, low-cost and safe upgrades for custom releases, support packs, enhancement packs and SAP HANA transformations. LiveCompare is the leading software platform for SAP operational analytics, and project intelligence. It delivers real-time insights, which help SAP business and IT professionals with day-to-day production support and point-in-time SAP projects. LiveCompare is proven to reduce the time, complexity and cost involved with the overall support and maintenance of SAP. Our benchmark study of 15 customers tells us that they reduce testing effort by 85%.
OpenText ALM/Quality Center serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps you govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes.
 

Sample Customers

Coca-Cola, eBay, BP, British American Tobacco, Surrey Country Council, AES, P66, MUD, Bentley Motors, Coats, Hershey, Kimberly Clark
Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)
Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
October 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,562 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.