Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

InterSystems Caché vs Oracle Database In-Memory comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

InterSystems Caché
Ranking in Embedded Database
11th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Non-Relational Databases (10th)
Oracle Database In-Memory
Ranking in Embedded Database
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Relational Databases Tools (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Embedded Database category, the mindshare of InterSystems Caché is 2.9%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database In-Memory is 28.2%, down from 39.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Embedded Database
 

Featured Reviews

Use InterSystems Caché?
Share your opinion
Duy AnhMai - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 12, 2024
Improved data processing speeds with enhanced security and processing efficiency
We use Oracle Database In-Memory to deploy applications for commercial purposes, store data securely, and ensure efficient data processing Oracle Database In-Memory has improved data storage and processing efficiency, which is crucial for handling large amounts of data in our products and…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Oracle Database In-Memory is expensive."
"The platform's licensing cost needs improvement."
"There is a need to make a yearly payment towards the licensing costs, after which there is any to pay towards the support cost attached to the solution."
"It's quite costly and it comes with a fixed price."
"I rate the pricing a zero out of ten because Database In-Memory is too costly."
"The pricing is pretty good so I rate it an eight out of ten."
"The product is expensive."
"Database In-Memory is priced a bit higher than its competitors like Microsoft."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Embedded Database solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
70%
Healthcare Company
18%
Computer Software Company
5%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Oracle Database In-Memory?
We can integrate it with any data sources as well.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database In-Memory?
Oracle Database In-Memory is very expensive. Additionally, there are extra costs for some features.
What needs improvement with Oracle Database In-Memory?
Oracle Database In-Memory is more expensive than Azure, and the support from the Oracle team is not very good, especially since they do not have a support team in our region.
 

Also Known As

InterSystems Cache
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

CysNET, Paltac Corporation, WS trends, PCS, Eventsforce, Ontario Systems, TD Ameritrade, MFS Investment Management, Assurenet, European Space Agency (ESA)
Shanghai Customs
Find out what your peers are saying about Firebird, SQLite, Oracle and others in Embedded Database. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.