Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Invicti vs Onapsis comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Invicti is highly scalable, excelling in handling multiple installations and extensive scans, despite occasional performance slowdowns with large applications.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
Invicti offers detailed scanning, customizable checks, and CI/CD integration, emphasizing accuracy and flexibility in web security testing.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
3.9
Invicti needs improved efficiency, better authentication, reporting, more database support, and enhancements in UI, documentation, and security features.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Invicti is stable and reliable, with minimal issues, except for occasional high resource usage and temporary glitches with large applications.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Invicti's customer service is praised for professionalism and promptness, offering effective support through various communication channels and regional partners.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Invicti offers flexible pricing, competitive for large enterprises, with subscriptions ranging from $5,000 to $15,000 for detailed security insights.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Invicti
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (14th), API Security (5th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (3rd)
Onapsis
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (39th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Invicti and Onapsis aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Invicti is designed for Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and holds a mindshare of 16.2%, up 14.7% compared to last year.
Onapsis, on the other hand, focuses on Application Security Tools, holds 0.1% mindshare, down 0.2% since last year.
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Amr Abdelnaser - PeerSpot reviewer
A safe solution used to detective vulnerabilities for dynamic and complex testing
The Invicti is the scope application tool. The solution is installed on-premise but could be installed as a web version. Starting from the latest version, the web version could be used. They have a web application server. The deployment of the solution involves installing the EXE and configuring your machine.
it_user19113 - PeerSpot reviewer
It checks for and reports vulnerabilities on all SAP systems at the OS, DB and SAP levels.
I really love how Onapsis X1 is able to check SAP for threats; the reporting was something I felt could be improved. It could be a little easier to use and to publish for consumption with a larger audience. Currently, it takes some background jobs and additional work to get them published. It was difficult to get interactive reports to the different levels of the business. I would have to download them and send them out, or save them on my SharePoint site and send out a weekly link. In the version of the product I was usingת I had to log into the X1 system directly to get to the reports. Reporting would be used by several different areas of the organizationת many of whom would be at the director and executive levels. It would not make sense to have them log directly into the tool to look at these reports. Add to this that there was only one ID that could be used to log in and view the reports. To solve this problemת I had to run all of the different reports; executive summary down to detailed analysis and then export them out to my security team SharePoint site. To automate this processת a batch script was created to run after the X1 analyzed the systems. The script would pull the reports and place them in the SharePoint site automatically, but it was a bit of a hassle to get set up.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
55%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?
The inventory prices are very competitive. The competitors are more expensive, but the estimated cost of Invicti is more competitive than that of other tools. They had very good pricing. We have di...
What do you like most about Invicti?
The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan.
What needs improvement with Invicti?
Invicti has provided a roadmap outlining the improvements they're focusing on. Given the competition, with tools like Qualys and many others in the market, the interface needs to be enhanced, integ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Netsparker
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank
Sony, US Army, Westinghouse, AXA. Galicia, Daimler, Roche, Levi's, Siemens, ABB, KPMG, Mercardo Libre, Verizon, Bacardi, Adgas, Sicpa, Whirlpool, Leaseplan
Find out what your peers are saying about HCLSoftware , OpenText, Invicti and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.