Invicti vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

Invicti and Spirent are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Invicti is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.9, while Spirent is ranked #32 with an average rating of 7.0. Invicti holds a 1.4% mindshare in SAST, compared to Spirent’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spirent users who would recommend it.

Invicti

Read 28 Invicti reviews

2,950 Views
1,573 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Spirent CyberFlood

Read 5 Spirent CyberFlood reviews

553 Views
350 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Invicti

Spirent CyberFlood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Spirent CyberFlood and Invicti compete in the cybersecurity solution market, with Invicti having an advantage due to its comprehensive features that users believe justify the cost.

Features: Spirent CyberFlood is recognized for robust testing capabilities, seamless integration options, and suitability for complex environments. Invicti stands out with detailed scanning capabilities, automation that streamlines detection processes, and a sophisticated feature set that enhances security workflow efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Spirent CyberFlood could improve by offering more intuitive dashboards, enhanced reporting functionalities, and simplified user navigation. Invicti users desire better response times, more comprehensive documentation, and improvements simplifying user navigation and efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spirent CyberFlood features straightforward deployment models and an effective customer service team. Invicti offers easy cloud-based deployment, though users sometimes encounter challenges with service responsiveness. Spirent's implementation may be more straightforward, while Invicti's model could offer long-term benefits with support enhancements.

Pricing and ROI: Spirent CyberFlood users find setup costs aligned with ROI, considering it cost-effective for network management. Invicti, perceived as higher in initial cost, is seen as delivering substantial ROI through its advanced security and automation. The decision often depends on perceived value versus investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Invicti vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. Spirent CyberFlood

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Invicti

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Security (5th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (3rd)

Spirent CyberFlood

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

32nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (35th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Invicti is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

JanetMuhia

Cyber Security Engineer at Spartec

Streamlined our security efforts by allowing us to integrate with tools like Jira

From my experience, Invicti is an exceptionally stable solution for web application security. Here's what stands out: * Consistent Performance: Over the three years we’ve used it, the solution has demonstrated reliable and consistent performance, even during large-scale scanning operations. * Minimal Downtime: I have not encountered significant downtime or disruptions while using Invicti, which is critical for security tools that organizations rely on continuously. * Robust Architecture: Its ability to handle complex scanning tasks without crashes or lag reflects its well-engineered platform. * Regular Updates: Invicti frequently releases updates and patches, which enhance functionality and address any stability concerns proactively. Rating : I would confidently rate Invicti’s stability at 9.5 out of 10. It ensures uninterrupted operations and supports high-performance demands, which are essential for enterprise environments.

Read full review

Jos Badimo

Director at BAMS

Test assurance improves compliance and products with good performance

The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one screen most of the time. Even if the system navigates me to another screen, it should effectively return me to the main screen.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most attractive feature was the reporting review tool. The reporting review was very impressive and produced very fruitful reports."

"When we try to manually exploit the vulnerabilities, it often takes time to realize what's going on and what needs to be done."

"The dashboard is really cool, and the features are really good. It tells you about the software version you're using in your web application. It gives you the entire technology stack, and that really helps. Both web and desktop apps are good in terms of application scanning. It has a lot of security checks that are easily customizable as per your requirements. It also has good customer support."

"Invicti's best feature is the ability to identify vulnerabilities and manually verify them."

"The solution generates reports automatically and quickly."

"The scanner is light on the network and does not impact the network when scans are running."

"I am impressed by the whole technology that they are using in this solution. It is really fast. When using netscan, the confirmation that it gives on the vulnerabilities is pretty cool. It is really easy to configure a scan in Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner. It is also really easy to deploy."

"Netsparker has valuable features, including the ability to scan our website, an interactive approach, and security data integration."

More Invicti pros

"CyberFlood is flexible."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

Cons

"They could enhance the support for data swap testing for the platform."

"The support's response time could be faster since we are in different time zones."

"Right now, they are missing the static application security part, especially web application security."

"Asset scanning could be better. Once, it couldn't scan assets, and the issue was strange. The price doesn't fit the budget of small and medium-sized businesses."

"The solution needs to make a more specific report."

"The license could be better. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license. It's a major hindrance that we are facing while scanning applications, and we have to be sure that the URLs are the same and not different so that we do not end up consuming another license for it. Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. The licensing is tied to the URL, and it's restricted. If you have a URL that you scanned once, like a website, you cannot retry that same license. If you are scanning the same website but in a different domain or different URL, you might end up paying for a second license. It would also be better if they provided proper support for multi-factor authentications. In the next release, I would like them to include good multi-factor authentication support."

"Currently, there is nothing I would like to improve."

"I think that it freezes without any specific reason at times. This needs to be looked into."

More Invicti cons

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

"The initial setup is not straightforward and can be quite challenging."

"The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"It is competitive in the security market."

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

56%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

22%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

As a technical user, I do not handle pricing or licensing, but I am aware that Invicti offers flexible licensing models based on organizational needs.

See all answers

What do you like most about Invicti?

The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Invicti?

Currently, there is nothing I would like to improve.

See all answers

What do you like most about Spirent CyberFlood?

CyberFlood is flexible.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?

I have been using the solution for a year now. The customers I work with are focused on both custom test assurance and test automation. The solution is utilized in the financial services sector and...

See all answers

Comparisons

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 17% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Invicti

Compared 15% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Invicti

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 74% of the time

Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 26% of the time

More Spirent CyberFlood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Invicti

January 2025

Download Invicti product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

January 2025

Download Spirent CyberFlood product report

Also Known As

Netsparker

CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing

Overview

Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.

Invicti

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

Spirent

Sample Customers

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank

Digicel

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. Spirent CyberFlood

January 2025

Free Report: Invicti vs. Spirent CyberFlood

Find out what your peers are saying about Invicti vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Invicti vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.