Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Invicti vs Sqreen comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Invicti
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (14th), API Security (5th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (3rd)
Sqreen
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (54th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (55th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Invicti and Sqreen aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Invicti is designed for Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and holds a mindshare of 16.2%, up 14.7% compared to last year.
Sqreen, on the other hand, focuses on Application Security Tools, holds 0.0% mindshare, down 0.1% since last year.
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Akshay Waghmare - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 9, 2023
A stable and user-friendly solution that can be used for dynamic application security testing
We use Invicti for dynamic application security testing and to integrate files into the pipeline The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan. The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved. I have been…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."
"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."
"It is competitive in the security market."
"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."
"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."
"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."
"The price should be 20% lower"
"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
55%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?
The inventory prices are very competitive. The competitors are more expensive, but the estimated cost of Invicti is more competitive than that of other tools. They had very good pricing. We have di...
What do you like most about Invicti?
The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan.
What needs improvement with Invicti?
Invicti has provided a roadmap outlining the improvements they're focusing on. Given the competition, with tools like Qualys and many others in the market, the interface needs to be enhanced, integ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Netsparker
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank
Rainforest, Le Monde, nestaway
Find out what your peers are saying about HCLSoftware , OpenText, Invicti and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.