Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Invicti vs Synopsys API Security Testing comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Invicti is highly scalable, excelling in handling multiple installations and extensive scans, despite occasional performance slowdowns with large applications.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
Invicti offers detailed scanning, customizable checks, and CI/CD integration, emphasizing accuracy and flexibility in web security testing.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
3.9
Invicti needs improved efficiency, better authentication, reporting, more database support, and enhancements in UI, documentation, and security features.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Invicti is stable and reliable, with minimal issues, except for occasional high resource usage and temporary glitches with large applications.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Invicti's customer service is praised for professionalism and promptness, offering effective support through various communication channels and regional partners.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Invicti offers flexible pricing, competitive for large enterprises, with subscriptions ranging from $5,000 to $15,000 for detailed security insights.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Invicti
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
14th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
API Security (5th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (3rd)
Synopsys API Security Testing
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
36th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Invicti is 1.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Synopsys API Security Testing is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Amr Abdelnaser - PeerSpot reviewer
A safe solution used to detective vulnerabilities for dynamic and complex testing
The Invicti is the scope application tool. The solution is installed on-premise but could be installed as a web version. Starting from the latest version, the web version could be used. They have a web application server. The deployment of the solution involves installing the EXE and configuring your machine.
UmarQureshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful threat vectors, beneficial results, but implementation needed support
We are using Synopsys API Security Testing for scanning APIs for risks and vulnerabilities and to understand our posture before deployment within our business The most valuable features of Synopsys API Security Testing are the metrics, results, and threat vectors that it shares. I have been…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
55%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?
The inventory prices are very competitive. The competitors are more expensive, but the estimated cost of Invicti is more competitive than that of other tools. They had very good pricing. We have di...
What do you like most about Invicti?
The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan.
What needs improvement with Invicti?
Invicti has provided a roadmap outlining the improvements they're focusing on. Given the competition, with tools like Qualys and many others in the market, the interface needs to be enhanced, integ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Netsparker
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.