Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IPRO vs LAW PreDiscovery comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IPRO
Ranking in eDiscovery
9th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
LAW PreDiscovery
Ranking in eDiscovery
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the eDiscovery category, the mindshare of IPRO is 2.7%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LAW PreDiscovery is 2.7%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
eDiscovery
 

Featured Reviews

Brian Grossman - PeerSpot reviewer
A powerful tool for litigation support services, such as production processing to meet client requirements
LAW PreDiscovery can simplify its interface and offer a cloud-accessible version tailored to customers. We often use other cloud-based document review software alongside LAW PreDiscovery to meet specific needs. This interchangeability allows us to handle specialized export requests more effectively. There also needs to be a more straightforward process for upgrading licenses without contacting support.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
842,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Legal Firm
43%
Government
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with LAW PreDiscovery?
LAW PreDiscovery can simplify its interface and offer a cloud-accessible version tailored to customers. We often use other cloud-based document review software alongside LAW PreDiscovery to meet sp...
What is your primary use case for LAW PreDiscovery?
We primarily use LAW PreDiscovery for litigation support services, such as production processing, importing native files, converting PDFs, bate numbering, batch printing trial exhibits, and archiva...
What advice do you have for others considering LAW PreDiscovery?
If you're a more prominent law firm or a litigation support vendor dealing with extensive document processing, LAW PreDiscovery could be a good fit. However, for smaller companies or law firms need...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Polsinelli Shughart, doeLegal, Cranfill Sumner & Hartzog, ProSearch Strategies, Levi and Korsinsky LLP, Commonwealth Legal, Manning Curtis, Shephard Data Services, Keating Meuthing & Klekamp PLL, Berger Singerman, Porter Wright, Yarmuth Wilsdon
Murphy & King, BDO Consulting, Beasley Allen
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Microsoft, Commvault and others in eDiscovery. Updated: February 2025.
842,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.