Istio vs NGINX Service-Mesh comparison

Isito and F5 are both solutions in the Service Mesh category. Isito is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while F5 is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. Isito holds a 22.9% mindshare in SM, compared to F5’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Isito users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of F5 users who would recommend it.

Istio

Read 11 Istio reviews

2,861 Views
2,315 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NGINX Service-Mesh

Read 1 NGINX Service-Mesh review

1,291 Views
1,201 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Istio

NGINX Service-Mesh

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Istio and NGINX Service-Mesh based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Isito, Envoy, HAProxy and others in Service Mesh.

To learn more, read our detailed Service Mesh Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Service Mesh

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Istio

Ranking in Service Mesh

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NGINX Service-Mesh

Ranking in Service Mesh

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Service Mesh category, the mindshare of Istio is 22.9%, up from 22.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NGINX Service-Mesh is 5.1%, down from 14.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Service Mesh

Featured Reviews

JETTI DINESH REDDY

Infra , DevSecOps & Automation Architect at Zuellig Pharma

Enhanced microservice security and advanced traffic management and good authentification

When our developers are building the microservices, instead of imposing additional burdens or additional thinking on them, especially as part of network features such as traffic management, security, or observability, we deploy something from the infrastructure side, so developers need only focus…

Read full review

Fernando Silva

Ingeniero at Servicios Eyenet S.A De C.V

A cost-effective and fully integrated service mesh that has good adaptability

The initial setup for NGINX Service-Mesh is straightforward. I have twenty engineers specifically for SI deployments, and we rely on gnet environments. Typically, we have many users, maybe a thousand users, and in Mexico, working with EC Telecom, we serve around five million users for the ISP solution, including internet and service provider solutions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The load balancing, service application, and monitoring of the life of the service are valuable features. We use it for authentication of call services, load balancing the calls among the service providers on service instances, and monitoring the health of the services."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."

"We can implement load balancing to distribute traffic across multiple service instances. Istio also offers traffic routing capabilities and circuit-breaking functionality. For security, it handles authentication using mutual TLS (mTLS) between services. It can authorize services using JWT tokens. Istio also allows defining policies for rate limiting to control traffic within services."

"What I find particularly valuable about Istio is that it is free of cost."

"Istio can save you time in terms of network troubleshooting."

"We use Istio for Service Discovery and routing traffic."

"Istio makes all that much easier - traffic splits, percentage traffic splits, doing some sort of chaos testing to see how it works."

"The tool's mutual TLS stands out. It provides secure communication between services within the cluster. Additionally, Istio offers built-in telemetry and tracing with tools like Jaeger, which aids monitoring and troubleshooting."

More Istio pros

"The solution is cost-effective and has good adaptability."

Cons

"Reducing the latency between the control plane and the data plane would be beneficial."

"Istio has issues with performance."

"Istio's documentation is basic and would benefit from more examples."

"If someone doesn't understand Kubernetes, they'll have issues working with Istio."

"It would be good if the solution had more community forums."

"Handling large-scale environments with proxies can strain resources, but horizontal scaling can improve fault tolerance."

"If you're a beginner in infrastructure management and networking, learning Istio might pose some challenges. However, if you have some knowledge of networking or service meshes, you should find it manageable. Istio's website offers documentation to guide you through learning."

"Based on my experience, the solution could be improved. They could simplify the learning process so that users can understand how its features work together, especially with components like Kibana. Learning about the different components is necessary. For instance, you need to understand the traffic flow, potential bottlenecks, and the architecture within Istio."

More Istio cons

"NGINX Service Mesh could be improved by integrating more intelligence and stability through certifications and SSL certificates."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the tool's open-source version, so there are no hidden fees or additional costs associated with it."

"It is on the less expensive side. It provides a significant saving for us in terms of cost and other things. It is open-source. We just download it from the open-source framework and use it."

"You can deploy Istio free of cost and don't need to pay for it."

"The pricing for NGINX Service-Mesh is very reasonable, offering us scalability and cost-effectiveness."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Mesh solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Istio?

Istio provides a significant saving for us in terms of costs since it is open source. However, Istio can still come at a price. It has a steep learning curve and might require more manpower hours ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Istio?

We use Istio for Service Discovery and routing traffic.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Istio?

At the moment, there are no immediate improvements needed. Reducing the latency between the control plane and the data plane would be beneficial.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NGINX Service-Mesh?

The pricing for NGINX Service-Mesh is very reasonable, offering us scalability and cost-effectiveness.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NGINX Service-Mesh?

NGINX Service Mesh could be improved by integrating more intelligence and stability through certifications and SSL certificates. Additionally, I need to review the solution for DDoS environments to...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NGINX Service-Mesh?

I'm using it to deliver applications and run easy telecom in Mexico. It currently helps distribute ISP, retail, and telecom environments.

See all answers

Comparisons

Kong Mesh vs Istio

Compared 44% of the time

HAProxy vs Istio

Compared 32% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Istio

Compared 6% of the time

AWS App Mesh vs Istio

Compared 4% of the time

Traefik Enterprise vs Istio

Compared 4% of the time

More Istio Competitors

Envoy vs NGINX Service-Mesh

Compared 26% of the time

HashiCorp Consul vs NGINX Service-Mesh

Compared 25% of the time

AWS App Mesh vs NGINX Service-Mesh

Compared 15% of the time

More NGINX Service-Mesh Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Istio

February 2025

Download Istio product report

Buyer's Guide

Service Mesh

February 2025

Download NGINX Service-Mesh product report

Overview

Connect
Intelligently control the flow of traffic and API calls between services, conduct a range of tests, and upgrade gradually with red/black deployments.

Secure
Automatically secure your services through managed authentication, authorization, and encryption of communication between services.

Control
Apply policies and ensure that they’re enforced, and that resources are fairly distributed among consumers.

Observe
See what's happening with rich automatic tracing, monitoring, and logging of all your services.

Isito

Designed to be lightweight and seamless, NGINX Service Mesh scales from open source projects to a fully supported, secure, and scalable enterprise class solution that enables users to take control of Kubernetes with a turnkey, secure, service-to-service solution featuring a unified data plane for ingress and egress management in a single configuration.

NGINX Service Mesh provides the seamless and transparent load balancing, reverse proxy, traffic routing, identity, and encryption features needed for production-grade service mesh deployments. When paired with the NGINX Plus-based version of NGINX Ingress Controller, it provides a unified data plane that can be managed with a single configuration.

Find out what your peers are saying about Isito, Envoy, HAProxy and others in Service Mesh. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Service Mesh vendors.

We monitor all Service Mesh reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.