Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ivanti Neurons for RBVM vs Vulcan Cyber comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security
Sponsored
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
65th
Average Rating
0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (6th)
Ivanti Neurons for RBVM
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
53rd
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Vulcan Cyber
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
30th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (19th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (11th), Cloud Security Remediation (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Zafran Security?
Share your opinion
Anon127 - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful for vulnerability management with many integrations
We use RiskSense for vulnerability management, and we have many integrations.  The solution is deployed on cloud. We use this solution daily. There are more than 200 people using this solution in my organization Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user…
Shreevinayak Deshpande - PeerSpot reviewer
Makes vulnerability management efficient with a single pane of glass and daily report generation
There are areas for improvement. Initially, when onboarding Vulcan Cyber, the setup and configuration was more complex than expected with a user-friendly approach. This aspect can be enhanced. An important area is performance and speed, as Vulcan Cyber often lacks speed when exporting reports. The team might have to work on scaling up servers. When we click on a vulnerability, it takes ten seconds to pop up a window and show the entire content. Instead of that, they can put a down arrow, and all the details should be shown on clicking the arrow. This will prevent that ten-second delay. Another area for improvement is providing support and documentation for their tool. Users should have access to easy-to-understand trial documentation for reference.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
University
9%
Retailer
7%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Insurance Company
7%
Computer Software Company
29%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Vulcan Cyber?
Its pricing is quite fair compared to what is out there in the market, especially compared to the tool from Microsoft...
What needs improvement with Vulcan Cyber?
Improvements are needed in providing more concise details on how to apply remedies for particular vulnerabilities. I ...
What is your primary use case for Vulcan Cyber?
Our primary use case for Vulcan Cyber is for asset management and vulnerability management. We use it to assess vulne...
 

Also Known As

No data available
RiskSense
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Care First, City of Alburquerque, Electric Company El Paso, State of Arizona, Washington Gas
Stitch Fix, Mandiant, Wealthsimple, Entrust, Anaplan, Deloitte, Origami Risk, Verana Health
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Qualys and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: February 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.