Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Jitterbit Vinyl vs WorkflowGen comparison

Jitterbit and WorkflowGen are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. Jitterbit is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0, while WorkflowGen is ranked #37. Jitterbit holds a 0.3% mindshare in RADS, compared to WorkflowGen’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Jitterbit users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WorkflowGen users who would recommend it.
Jitterbit Vinyl
Read 31 Jitterbit Vinyl reviews
  • 970 Views
  • 210 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
WorkflowGen
Read 3 WorkflowGen reviews
  • 155 Views
  • 115 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Jitterbit Vinyl and WorkflowGen compete in workflow automation. WorkflowGen has the upper hand due to superior features, despite higher costs.

Features: Jitterbit Vinyl offers easy integration capabilities, extensive API support, and pricing advantage. WorkflowGen provides flexibility, handles complex workflows efficiently, and offers an advanced feature set suitable for complex automation needs.

Room for Improvement: Jitterbit Vinyl needs more customization options, enhanced documentation, and usability enhancements. WorkflowGen requires an improved error-handling mechanism, increased scalability, and can present a steeper learning curve.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jitterbit Vinyl is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. WorkflowGen offers comprehensive setup guidance but needs more initial configuration, and its deployment is perceived as requiring more technical proficiency.

Pricing and ROI: Jitterbit Vinyl is known for competitive pricing and quick ROI. WorkflowGen, while more expensive, delivers long-term value through its extensive capabilities, and users find the overall cost justified by its robust performance and long-term benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 842,767 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Jitterbit Vinyl
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
24th
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
23rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No-Code Development Platforms (7th)
WorkflowGen
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
37th
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
33rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (28th), Business Process Management (BPM) (54th), Process Automation (40th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Jitterbit Vinyl is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkflowGen is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

LE
Can connect to any data source so we don't need to replicate data into a data warehouse to do reporting analytics
Having been a customer of theirs for a long time, I think the UI needed improvements early on. But, they have done a remarkable job catching up in that regard. They have always been great at connecting to a variety of data sources. They are a leader in that space. They do a great job, from a business analyst perspective, helping you shape what the ultimate system is going to look like. There really aren't a lot of areas that need improvement. The areas that they have, they are keenly aware of and have made great strides in recent releases.
Read full review
CO
Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable
We use this product for many different reasons related to our business We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do. The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically trigger the workflow. This solution needs to be…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product is super fast at getting things done."
"Their integrations are terrific. We've had zero issues, a 100 percent success rate with integrations. In terms of Zudy's data source connectors and API integrations, we've been really pleased. We use some software that is very common in the media business, and then we also have some custom things that we built for a variety of different use cases within our company, and we've had zero integration issues, in terms of getting data into Zudy and getting data out of it. It's been great."
"We have been able to leverage the platform to rapidly build custom solutions, and tailor-make them to our needs."
"Zudy has increased development speed. What would take us months to be able to complete, we're getting done in a matter of weeks. I have a number of projects that we were working on that I thought that we'd [only] be able to get completed by next year. We've already completed them and we're still in the year 2020."
"The Lite Integration is really the key thing. You're able to attach the Vinyl software to a variety of different systems very easily and pull data together in a way that is really difficult to do using traditional technology... Also, the fact that it's a no-code platform also makes it easier for people to understand and deal with internally, to continue to build applications and modify existing applications."
"The way that they've done some of the reports, they've created really great data dumps. If I want to see a snapshot of something in time, for a given timeframe, I can download it. From that download, I can create further analysis or do my own thing with it, which is really helpful. I'm even able to go back several years and get data."
"You do not need to be a programmer to use it or build something in it."
"It's customizable to whatever you see might use it for... It's very user-friendly, and the front-end is exactly what we need to see, very simple. It can get more complicated too, if those are the needs."
More Jitterbit Vinyl pros
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
 

Cons

"When you are trying to delete certain columns or delete or drop tables, it will throw an error and it will force you to hunt down every location where those things are being referenced. You have to delete them from the very end and work your way backward... It would be easier, when you're deleting that table, if it would concatenate all the way down."
"There are a lot of almost "hidden" features captured in these Edge Case settings... If you want a scroll bar at the bottom, instead of having it select rows to show, you have to select Disable Panel Location Service, which doesn't sound at all like what it's supposed to do. Naming conventions could be changed a little bit."
"Eventually, a nicer way to create certain features, like the way that we create PDFs, would help. Sometimes the way that it resizes when I have multiple windows up, could also be better. It's minor stuff though. It's edge-case stuff."
"I don't have a lot of negative things to say about the platform. One of the things we joke about, because it is very minor in detail, is that as with any platform, when you're hosting a live webinar on a GoToMeeting or a Zoom, everything slows down a little bit. So when you're doing a live demo internally with folks, the platform can go a step slower. That's not necessarily just a Zudy thing."
"I sometimes find formatting tricky to get the front end of an app the way I want it."
"Version 2.3 has a good UI but we want a more customizable UI."
"When designing the user interface, there are many built-in features; however, Vinyl could use some more extensive design elements that are used in marketing, such as Canva or Web design tools. These would allow for more extensive design elements to be added more easily."
"During the initial rollout, the text editor wasn't 100% what we were looking for, but we were able to get the job done. After some discussions and finding ways to use different plugins during the short term, Zudy actually came back a few months later and said that they have integrated a standard product into their text editing that checked all the boxes for us."
More Jitterbit Vinyl cons
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing costs we pay are, I believe about 5,000 a month. That's every quarter. We've been doing it for about a year now, and the prices have remained steady. We feel it's a reasonable cost for what we're getting because it's unlimited users. So as big as you want to make it, you're not constrained by a per-user licensing cost or any of those other restrictions, so that's going to stifle your development."
"The pricing is moderate. It's okay."
"We have seen a 30 percent decrease in time for some of our workflows."
"I feel the product’s pricing is a good value. The licensing model is very straightforward. You license the platform and you can build however many solutions you want with it."
"We haven't really had any issues with pricing. Like with any good partnership, you're paying a fair and good price for a good product. That's where great partnerships are developed, when one side doesn't feel like they won in a deal; when both sides feel like they won. That's where we are with Zudy VINYL."
"Pricing and licensing are on par with or better than what we were looking at and what we had. That was also one of the key factors for making the decision. We cut our costs in half by going over to the Zudy platform."
"We also pay for the managed services help that we get from them. But, to me, it is a very effective cost model. Licenses are relatively inexpensive, then you pay by the drink in terms of the managed services that you are going to need, which has been great. We figure out where we want to apply those services and try to be pretty diligent about managing the costs there."
"Compared to if I used traditional methods, such as hiring developers and setting up systems, VINYL is costing me less than half of what it would normally cost."
More Jitterbit Vinyl pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Consumer Goods Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Zudy VINYL?
The ZPM system enables us to organize projects and monitor their progress. The ease of logging into the VINYL app to test new features makes testing smoother, and we feel more involved in the crea...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zudy VINYL?
Payment processing has changed since Jitterbit acquired Zudy. We previously cut checks, but we are no longer allowed. This has made paying for the service more complicated, but the issue is being r...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Zudy VINYL?
Some aspects of VINYL are limiting from a B2C standpoint. For example, it would be nice to have more flexibility with what the VINYL parameters allow us to develop within the app. It is difficult t...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Power Apps vs Jitterbit Vinyl Logo
Microsoft Power Apps vs Jitterbit Vinyl
Compared 100% of the time
More Jitterbit Vinyl Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Jitterbit Vinyl
March 2025
Jitterbit Vinyl reportDownload Jitterbit Vinyl product report
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Design
March 2025
WorkflowGen reportDownload WorkflowGen product report
 

Overview

Jitterbit's Vinyl (previously Zudy) is an enterprise low-code application platform that makes it easy to build scalable, end-to-end apps that are easily integrated with new and existing systems. Designed for large enterprises to solve complex business problems at scale, Vinyl empowers anyone to create fully integrated, bi-directional applications in weeks. Powerful enough for Full Stack Developers, intuitive enough for Citizen Developers/Business Technologists, Vinyl empowers you to create secure apps that run on any device, automate any business process, and integrate any data source without coding.

  • Create fully integrated, bi-directional applications

  • Utilize guided development and visual rule builders

  • Predictable pricing with no per-user fees

  • Integrate the entire ecosystem without impacting source data

  • Protect apps with enterprise-grade security

  • Integrate real-time data

  • Deploy apps via enterprise cloud, on-premise or hosted

  • Improve customer digital experience


For more information: www.jitterbit.com/product/viny

Jitterbit

Immediately accelerate business process adaptability with fluid workflow automation. Use the WorkflowGen .NET workflow software's low code environment to maximize the efficiency of process designers and developers.

Automate any type of human and system-based enterprise process within a battle-tested infrastructure.

Customize and integrate your workflow apps to meet your requirements in a highly configurable environment.

Engage process participants with a full-featured workflow portal, native mobile apps, and email approvals, or through seamless integration with your own web apps.

Leverage a solution used by Fortune 500 companies for worldwide business-critical applications.

WorkflowGen
 

Sample Customers

Aetna, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., Alvarez and Marsal, Audacy, Barstool Sports, Brooks Brothers, Cal-Maine Foods Inc., CNH Financial, Collette Travel, Darn Tough Vermont, DXL, Fresh Direct, iHeartMedia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, JBS Foods, J.Crew, Kraft Sports Group, MEMIC, New England Patriots, PGT Trucking Inc., United Healthcare, Worley
Comcast, Deloitte, Mitsui & Co Ltd, Sanofi Pasteur, Textron, XL Group. WorkflowGen accelerates business process adaptability in 70 countries for 500+ organizations and 1,000,000 users.
Buyer's Guide
Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen
March 2025
Free Report: Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen
Find out what your peers are saying about Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.