Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Juniper QFX Series Switches vs TeraScale [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Juniper QFX Switches offer scalability and durability, supporting future growth for small to medium environments despite deployment challenges.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.1
Juniper QFX Switches offer efficient VxLAN and EVPN support, high port density, reliability, and performance with Broadcom chipsets.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
3.7
Juniper QFX Series Switches face pricing, complexity, upgrade, integration, scalability, and storage connectivity challenges, hindering market expansion.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Juniper QFX Series Switches deliver stable performance, with minor upgrade issues resolved easily, maintaining high user satisfaction and security.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Juniper QFX Series Switches customer support is praised for professionalism, responsiveness, extensive resources, and effective issue resolution.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Juniper QFX Series Switches are costly, proficiently scalable, with added feature licenses, yet often cheaper than Cisco.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Juniper QFX Series Switches
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Ethernet Switches (19th), Data Center Networking (5th)
TeraScale [EOL]
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Abdul  Malik - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers high port density, including 1/25G/40G/100G and 400 options upto 2 RU and lower power consumption and leverages Broadcom chipsets for enhanced performance
In terms of performance, scalability, and other factors, I would rate them around eight out of ten. I've encountered a few issues during deployments based on customer experiences. My first deployment was with the QFX5100-48S for a data center customer. I implemented layer-2 connectivity on them. Overall, I would say they're good for small-scale and medium scale so it seems these problems can persist for some time. However, the QFX series is still generally considered a good product and offers more flexibility than other options. It's very scalable. I haven't heard any customer complaints about scalability. In my experience, even the QFX5110 series extends for many years without needing upgrades. This scalability solves the challenge of needing to upgrade due to unknown internal problems, even when the release is stable.
AK
Technology is good but the price is the only factor
If you are considering TerraScale you should compare with the competition and determine which product will give them the best efficiency versus price. Efficiency in terms of capacity, or cost per terabyte. That is the only factor. I would rate this solution an 8 out of 10 because of the cost per terabyte.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Center Networking solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Linode, VPRO, West Chester University
DavCo Restaurants Inc., Massage Envy, MakeMyTrip.com
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Arista, Dell Technologies and others in Data Center Networking. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.