Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Selenium HQ vs k6 Open Source comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

k6 Open Source
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
13th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Load Testing Tools (14th)
Selenium HQ
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
108
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Regression Testing Tools category, the mindshare of k6 Open Source is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Selenium HQ is 5.8%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Regression Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

NalinGoonawardana - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good scalability and has the ability to integrate with various systems and services
One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter. While k6 is a powerful tool for performance testing, it leans heavily towards coding. Having a GUI, even if it is a low-code approach, could make it more accessible to a broader audience. It would be beneficial to strike a balance where basic tasks can be performed graphically through a user-friendly interface, while still allowing the flexibility for more complex operations through code, similar to how JMeter operates. This could enhance the user experience and make k6 more approachable for those who may not be as comfortable with scripting.
LokeshYadav - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to use with great pricing and lots of documentation
I've also worked with Micro Focus. I'm working with Micro Focus, however, for that part, I'm working on the mainframe - although I've done some web testing using Micro Focus on a website. Otherwise, I found Selenium to be easier, and simpler to use than Micro Focus when it comes to the web. A lot of support online is available. A lot of forums, and communities are there. For Micro Focus, the part where you identify objects on a webpage, that part is pretty simple on Selenium. You can use XPath or CSS or IDE or anything, and it works fine. Yet with Micro Focus, the web part, I found it a little tedious to work with. Selenium is much easier in that sense on the web part.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing."
"The tool's big advantage is that it is more performance-test oriented for experienced testers who know what they are doing. In a normal working setup, performance engineers frequently work with DevOps and development teams. For these teams, k6 Open Source's syntax is much simpler and easier to understand and apply in the working process."
"Selenium HQ's most valuable feature is its online community support, which is comprehensive and easy to access."
"Its biggest advantage is that it is very customizable."
"It supports multiple processes, which is great."
"There is a supportive community around it."
"I believe Selenium HQ to be the best solution in the market for automating web applications"
"Selenuim helps us during testing. We are able to reduce the number and frequency of manual efforts by using scripts."
"We can run multiple projects at the same time and we can design both types of framework, including data-driven or hybrid. We have got a lot of flexibility here."
"The plugins, the components, and the method of the library with Selenium is very user defined."
 

Cons

"One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter."
"For now, I guess Selenium could add some other features like object communications for easy expansion."
"Selenium HQ doesn't have any self-healing capabilities."
"The initial setup was difficult."
"The initial setup of Selenium HQ is difficult in many areas, such as the framework."
"The reporting part can be better."
"It would be better if we could use it without having the technical skills to run the scripting test."
"I would like to see automatic logs generated."
"Could have additional readability and abstraction."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The product is open-source and free."
"It is free to use."
"The setup cost is open source or free."
"It is an open-source solution."
"Selenium HQ is a free and open-source solution and is supported by Google."
"The solution is open-source, so it is 100% free with no hidden charges."
"It's open-source, so it's free."
"This is an open-source product so there is no cost other than manpower."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
8%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about k6 Open Source?
The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing.
What needs improvement with k6 Open Source?
One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter. While k6 is a powerful tool for performance testing, it leans heavily towards coding. Having a GUI, even if it is a low-co...
What is your primary use case for k6 Open Source?
k6 Open Source is a powerful tool, especially for API-level performance testing. Its integration capabilities and ease of use make it promising for a wider audience.
How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
What do you like most about Selenium HQ?
Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Selenium HQ?
As an open-source tool, Selenium does not have direct costs, but coding can be money-intensive because it is challenging.
 

Also Known As

Load Impact
SeleniumHQ
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

rackspace, salesforce.com, IBM, servicenow, Nasdaq, JWT
BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Find out what your peers are saying about Selenium HQ vs. k6 Open Source and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.