Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

KCI CONTROL vs SAS Activity-Based Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

KCI CONTROL
Ranking in Business Performance Management
26th
Average Rating
6.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAS Activity-Based Management
Ranking in Business Performance Management
17th
Average Rating
5.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of KCI CONTROL is 0.6%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Activity-Based Management is 1.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Performance Management
 

Featured Reviews

it_user192339 - PeerSpot reviewer
Saves time and helps efficiency compared to just using Excel but improvements to database features for analytics needed.
Database features for analytics i.e. retrieving data. The biggest flaw of KCI Control9 and previous versions is that all data retrieval is 'view' based. You can not simply define the dimensions and retrieve the data. You have to define the dimensions in a 'view' and only then can you use that 'view' to build ad hoc reports. Another serious flaw is that if you want to share this ad hoc report that you built with another employee, that person will have to set their 'view' dimensions to at a minimum include all the dimension parameters as the report or the whole report will not work. I've heard from KCI that in Control10 they will be eliminating this 'view' restrictions for retrieving data and it's seriously about time. It has been such a handicap to this product.
it_user195021 - PeerSpot reviewer
OLAP data extraction and export is a valuable feature but the drilling function needs to be brought back.
ABM: * We use ABM as an expense allocation model and it has improve the awareness and accountability of the cost incurred (due to the 'traceability' feature as mentioned in no.4 above). * We are able to run and refresh the expense allocation result based on monthly source data (Driver Quantity) to derive more accurate data for reporting. (We are aware that many other organisations are using excel spreadsheet to perform their allocation and it has very much restricted the frequency and complexity of the allocation that they can be performed). EG has helped to handle huge database ETL which definitely improve efficiency.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

British American Tobacco, BAE Systems, Catalytic Solution, Classroom Connect, Gehr Enterprises, ITLA Capital Corporation, MDRC, Washington Trust Bank
Bank of Queensland, Barclays Bank, BioMar, Danske Bank, Danske Spil, DPPS, First Allied
Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, IBM and others in Business Performance Management. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.