Klocwork vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

Perforce and Spirent are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Perforce is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.5, while Spirent is ranked #35 with an average rating of 7.0. Perforce holds a 1.4% mindshare in AS, compared to Spirent’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spirent users who would recommend it.

Klocwork

Read 20 Klocwork reviews

3,108 Views
1,864 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Spirent CyberFlood

Read 4 Spirent CyberFlood reviews

164 Views
104 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Klocwork

Spirent CyberFlood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Spirent CyberFlood and Klocwork compete in network and code analysis categories, respectively. Klocwork takes the upper hand in code analysis with its advanced features and language support, while Spirent CyberFlood stands out in network performance testing.

Features: Spirent CyberFlood is known for its real-time analytics, integrated threat intelligence, and strong performance testing capabilities. Klocwork is recognized for automated vulnerability identification, enhanced code security measures, and extensive support for multiple programming languages.

Room for Improvement: Spirent CyberFlood could improve scalability, user access controls, and initial setup processes. Klocwork users indicate a need for better integration with some IDEs, more intuitive report generation, and streamlined configuration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spirent CyberFlood's deployment is straightforward but can present initial setup challenges. Its customer service is responsive. Klocwork, while requiring more setup effort, benefits from comprehensive documentation and a knowledgeable support team making the deployment process smoother.

Pricing and ROI: Spirent CyberFlood offers competitive pricing, though some users have mixed opinions on its long-term ROI. Klocwork is more expensive; however, its comprehensive feature set contributes to a better ROI, especially for companies focused on code quality.

To learn more, read our detailed Klocwork vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Klocwork vs. Spirent CyberFlood

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Klocwork

Ranking in Application Security Tools

23rd

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Code Analysis (7th)

Spirent CyberFlood

Ranking in Application Security Tools

35th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

32nd

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Klocwork is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

AnirbanSarkar

Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.

Oct 18, 2022

Lets you find defects during the development phase, so you don't have to wait till the development is over to find and address flaws

What needs improvement in Klocwork, compared to other products in the market, is the dashboard or reporting mechanisms that need to be a bit more flexible. The Klocwork dashboard could be improved. Though it's good, it's not as good as some of the other products in the market, which is a problem. The reporting could be more detailed and easier to sort out because sorting in Klocwork could be a bit more time-consuming, mainly when sorting defects based on filters, compared to how it's done on other tools such as Coverity. What I'd like added in the next release of Klocwork is the peer code review Cahoots which used to be a part of Klocwork, and the architecture analysis and both have been taken out of Klocwork. I found the two critical for specific deployments, so if those can be brought back to Klocwork, that would be very good.

Read full review

Haider Jarral

Lead Technologist | Strategic Alliance | Business Development at Illumio

May 4, 2023

I like the solution's flexibility

I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing CyberFlood is flexible. Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Klocwork's most valuable feature is the static code analysis feature. It detects the potential problem earlier to allow the developer to receive feedback quickly and then address it before it becomes a problem."

"There is a central Klocwork server at our headquarter in France so we connect the client directly to the server on-premises remotely."

"I like not having to dig through false positives. Chasing down a false positive can take anywhere from five minutes for a small easy one, then something that is complicated and goes through a whole bunch of different class cases, and it can take up to 45 minutes to an hour to find out if it is a false positive or not."

"The reporting helps us understand the trend of our results and whether we improve over time. We can see the history within Klocwork's server architecture and know that we're making things better. It creates a great story for our management. We can demonstrate value and how our software is developing over time."

"The ability to create custom checkers is a plus."

"There's a feature in Klocwork called 'on-the-fly analysis', which helps developers to find and fix the defects at the time of development itself."

"It's integrated into our CI, continuous integration."

"On-the-fly analysis and incremental analysis are the best parts of Klocwork. Currently, we are using both of these features very effectively."

More Klocwork pros

"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

"CyberFlood is flexible."

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."

Cons

"Now the only issue we have is that whenever we need to get the code we have to build it first. Then we can get the report."

"Every update that we receive requires of us a lengthy and involved process."

"The main problem is that since it only parses the code, the warnings or the problems that are given as a result of the report can sometimes require a lot of effort to analyze."

"I would like to see better codes between projects and a more user-friendly desktop in the next release."

"What needs improvement in Klocwork, compared to other products in the market, is the dashboard or reporting mechanisms that need to be a bit more flexible. The Klocwork dashboard could be improved. Though it's good, it's not as good as some of the other products in the market, which is a problem. The reporting could be more detailed and easier to sort out because sorting in Klocwork could be a bit more time-consuming, mainly when sorting defects based on filters, compared to how it's done on other tools such as Coverity."

"Modern languages, such as Angular and .NET, should be included as a part of Klocwork. They have recently added Kotlin as a part of their project, but we would like to see more languages in Klocwork. That's the reason we are using Coverity as a backup for some of the other languages."

"Under NIST cybersecurity standards, we must address vulnerabilities within a specified time after discovering them. When we try to propagate those updates and fixes through the system, it would be nice if the clients could reconnect to the existing server or have the server dynamically updated in some way. I know that isn't easy, but maybe processes could be enhanced to make that more streamlined from a DevOps perspective."

"We bought Klocwork, but it was limited to one little program, but the program is now sort of failing. So, we have a license for usage on a program that is sort of failing, and we really can't use the license on anything else."

More Klocwork cons

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."

"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Klocwork should not to be quite so heavy handed on the licensing for very specific programs."

"The limitation that we have is that Klocwork is licensed to certain programs, and if you want to license them to other programs, you have to pay more money."

"The pricing for Klocwork is very competitive if you compare it from apple to apple. It has competitive pricing regarding the licensing model and the per-license cost. Klocwork isn't a high-end investment for anyone deploying it; even SMBs can afford it. The Klocwork cost per user would depend on the license type, so I'm unable to mention a ballpark figure because it would depend on the type of installation and how the deployment will be, and the nodes to give an accurate calculation or figure. The total price depends on the package, so my company could never publish pricing for Klocwork on the website. My team first collects information from potential clients on the deployment scenario, project environment, etc., before suggesting a package for Klocwork. My rating for Klocwork in terms of pricing is a five because of its flexible license models. There's a license model for every type of organization, whether small, midsize, or enterprise, so it's a five out of five for me."

"This solution offers competitive pricing."

"When it comes to licensing, the solution has two packages, one for a fixed and the other for a floating server, with the former being more cost effective than the latter."

"There are other solutions on the market such as Microsoft Visual Studio. They have been adding more static code analysis features that come for free. It is getting better all the time. That is one of the possibilities is that we've been considering that we may stop using the Klocwork because it doesn't give us any added value."

"Klocwork is still tight on their licensing. If Klocwork would loosen up on the licensing, and where the license could be used, and how many different programs could be run on it, then we have several development programs that I would love to be able to use it for going forward."

"Licensing fees are paid annually, but they also have a perpetual license."

"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

40%

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Klocwork?

It's integrated into our CI, continuous integration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Klocwork?

Our purchasing department is responsible for tracking costs. It's one of the most widely used tools in our organization. It likely does not have a high price point. I don't have insights into licen...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Klocwork?

The main problem is that since it only parses the code, the warnings or the problems that are given as a result of the report can sometimes require a lot of effort to analyze. It will show all poss...

See all answers

What do you like most about Spirent CyberFlood?

CyberFlood is flexible.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?

Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more detail...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?

I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Klocwork

Compared 39% of the time

Coverity vs Klocwork

Compared 32% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Klocwork

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Klocwork

Compared 4% of the time

CodeSonar vs Klocwork

Compared 3% of the time

More Klocwork Competitors

Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 70% of the time

Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 30% of the time

More Spirent CyberFlood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Klocwork

October 2024

Download Klocwork product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

October 2024

Download Spirent CyberFlood product report

Also Known As

No data available

CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing

Learn More

Perforce

Spirent

Overview

Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

Sample Customers

ACCESS Co Ltd, Risk-AI, Winbond Electronics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, University of Southern California, Alebra Technologies, SIMULIA, Risk Management Solutions, Brigham Young University, SRD, HRL

Digicel

Buyer's Guide

Klocwork vs. Spirent CyberFlood

October 2024

Free Report: Klocwork vs. Spirent CyberFlood

Find out what your peers are saying about Klocwork vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Klocwork vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.