Komodor vs Rancher Labs comparison

Komodor and Rancher Labs are both solutions in the Container Management category. Komodor is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.8, while Rancher Labs is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8. Komodor holds a 1.4% mindshare in CM, compared to Rancher Labs’s 8.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Komodor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rancher Labs users who would recommend it.

Komodor

Read 5 Komodor reviews

960 Views
193 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Rancher Labs

Read 14 Rancher Labs reviews

4,868 Views
3,957 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Komodor

Rancher Labs

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 13, 2024

Rancher Labs and Komodor compete in the Kubernetes ecosystem, with Rancher Labs offering extensive multi-cluster support while Komodor excels in troubleshooting capabilities. Rancher Labs has the upper hand in infrastructure management and integration support, whereas Komodor leads in incident resolution efficiency and real-time troubleshooting.

Features: Rancher Labs provides robust multi-cluster management, integration with numerous cloud providers, and scalable infrastructure management. Komodor offers detailed visibility into Kubernetes applications, comprehensive monitoring tools, and efficient issue resolution.

Room for Improvement: Rancher Labs could enhance its user interface and expand documentation for ease of use. Improving customer support response times and refining integration processes could also be beneficial. Komodor might focus on expanding feature sets, providing more educational resources for users new to Kubernetes, and improving the intuitive nature of their platform.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rancher Labs features straightforward deployment supported by detailed documentation and robust customer service, facilitating seamless integration. Komodor's deployment emphasizes quick setup with a user-friendly interface, offering excellent support for application monitoring and active user engagement.

Pricing and ROI: Rancher Labs is competitively priced with favorable ROI due to its ability to support diverse environments. Komodor, although perceived as more premium, provides compelling value through advanced troubleshooting features that boost operational efficiency. While Rancher Labs delivers cost-effectiveness, Komodor offers substantial value for teams prioritizing incident resolution.

To learn more, read our detailed Komodor vs. Rancher Labs Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Komodor vs. Rancher Labs

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Komodor

Ranking in Container Management

12th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Rancher Labs

Ranking in Container Management

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Storage for Kubernetes (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Komodor is 1.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rancher Labs is 8.4%, up from 8.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management

Featured Reviews

Jacek Kisynski

Senior Staff Software Developer at Visier

Makes it easier for our development team to "own" Kubernetes, saving our SRE team time

There's nothing in particular that is wrong with Komodor. It's hard to say that there's something we would really like to see improved. I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development. I would like to see if we're utilizing nodes in the cluster, if pod allocation is optimal, how much idling we have, and whether we scale up and down efficiently. I would like to see them help us optimize costs further. Because, as our company grows and our clusters get busier and busier, any inefficiency is a lot of money wasted. That's definitely high on our wish list: anything that helps us track wasted resources.

Read full review

RyanVassallo

Head of Systems and Infrastructure at Booming Games

Offers an open-source version along with a good UI

The product has multiple good features. One of the solution's good features is that it is the GitOps functionality known as Rancher fleet, which is used for continuous delivery. The tool's UI is very convenient enough to help you manage multiple clusters in the cloud or on-premises, making it a product with which you can manage different clusters and locations. The tool also has a feature that is still kind of maturing, but I think it has very good potential. This new feature is named Harvester, which is allows users to have virtual machines managed by Kubernetes engine. This is very new technology in the market. I think that Harvester needs to mature as a product, and I think that in the future, it will be very powerful. You have one tool that does many things for you.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The service overview is definitely the most valuable feature. With it, I can see all the services and see if they're healthy or not without having to go specifically into each workflow individually. It has been immensely helpful for us whenever we've had network issues or other such issues. We've been able to use Komodor and see at a glance where there might be potential issues."

"The event timeline has been super helpful, enabling us to overlay node events in the same timeline as deployment events... That helps an engineer very quickly troubleshoot without having to do too much digging."

"Komodor's multi-cluster centralized event timeline is the most valuable feature."

"The more time we use Komodor the more we save. Currently, we have seen around a ten percent return on investment."

"The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly check what's happening or what has happened."

"The most valuable feature of Rancher Labs is its user interface, which makes it easier to work with containers and deployment."

"A great UI with very good integrations."

"The initial setup is simple and straightforward."

"The most valuable feature is its comprehensive support, easy resource scaling, compatibility with various OEMs, and seamless service integration."

"The solution is stable."

"The scalability potential is very good."

"The customized deployment process is the most valuable feature in Rancher Labs."

"This solution is not vendor-locked, which means that we we are able to use it across all of our resources; this feature is of great value to us."

More Rancher Labs pros

Cons

"One thing we don't have visibility into, which I would love to have, is metrics, such as user logins and usage. It's really hard to know what people are doing when I don't have any metrics on that directly."

"I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development."

"I would like to see improvements in how the product is installed. We've already communicated these things directly to Komodor. One feature we would like to see is for Komodor to be highly available on the clusters. Currently, it's only able to run in one instance within the cluster."

"Komodor's visibility could be improved."

"I like the alerts that Komodor provides, but I think the alert interface could be improved."

"They should improve application visibility along with code visibility."

"The biggest room for improvement in Rancher Labs would be to have a proper upgrading plan."

"We're looking for something that is even easier to use. It's a bit complicated."

"Could be more intuitive."

"We'd like their monitoring tool to be integrated by default."

"We have found that the auto-secure feature of this solution doesn't always work, and could be improved to be more reliable, particularly when working with business critical applications."

"One area for improvement in Rancher Labs is the development aspect."

"If you have poor infrastructure, you will have issues with the tool."

More Rancher Labs cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay according to the number of resources we have; if we are a small start-up, we have fewer resources and thus pay less."

"Other options pop up, but Komodor's pricing works well for our use case. It's fair, and we appreciate it. A lot of other vendors price their solutions in a way that would cost us disproportionately more money than they should. Komodor's pricing is reasonable in the way they calculate usage and value."

"As far as I can recall, the licensing cost was fair."

"The licensing model is fine. It is per node, which is good, but the pricing is high. Currently, I am fine with it, but I am a little concerned about the pricing as we scale. So, it is on the higher end. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the most expensive, Komodor is a seven."

"The cost is reasonable since it's open source. Rancher effectively addresses container orchestration trends, especially for those with some Kubernetes knowledge."

"There is an annual subscription. The price of the solution should be cheaper and have better pricing flexibility."

"The solution is free and open source but there is a fee for support."

"There are no hidden charges attached to the product unless a user opts for the premium support offered by the solution."

"Although Rancher Labs is an open-source solution, they also offer a paid version, where you buy the support when needed."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs involved."

"The pricing of the solution sits in the mid range, not high and not low. It has a fixed price that you pay every month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Wellness & Fitness Company

26%

Computer Software Company

14%

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Komodor?

The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Komodor?

The licensing model is fine. It is per node, which is good, but the pricing is high. Currently, I am fine with it, but I am a little concerned about the pricing as we scale. So, it is on the higher...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Komodor?

See all answers

What do you like most about Rancher Labs?

The tool's UI is very convenient enough to help you manage multiple clusters in the cloud or the company, making it a product with which you can manage different clusters and locations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rancher Labs?

The cost is reasonable since it's open-source. Rancher effectively addresses container orchestration trends, especially for those with some Kubernetes knowledge.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rancher Labs?

While Rancher Labs provides some level of security, it's not considered very robust. We found it to offer basic security features, which met some of our requirements, but we also relied on other op...

See all answers

Comparisons

Portainer vs Komodor

Compared 55% of the time

Amazon EKS vs Komodor

Compared 9% of the time

More Komodor Competitors

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Rancher Labs

Compared 40% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Rancher Labs

Compared 10% of the time

Docker vs Rancher Labs

Compared 8% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs Rancher Labs

Compared 7% of the time

Google Kubernetes Engine vs Rancher Labs

Compared 4% of the time

More Rancher Labs Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Komodor

December 2024

Download Komodor product report

Buyer's Guide

Rancher Labs

December 2024

Download Rancher Labs product report

Learn More

Komodor

Rancher Labs

Overview

Komodor is the missing piece in your DevOps toolchain - offering one unified platform from which you can gain a deep understanding of all of your system events and changes. We integrate with all of your tools, monitor changes and alerts and organize information on a clear digestible dashboard and provide you with the right context at the right time.

Rancher Labs build innovative, open source software that makes it easy to deploy and manage containers in production on any infrastructure. We enable organizations to accelerate all aspects of their software development pipeline, from writing and testing code to running complex microservices-based applications.

Rancher, our flagship container management platform, allows users to easily manage all aspects of running containers in development and production environments, on any infrastructure. With well over four million downloads, Rancher has quickly become the tools of choice for teams serious about running containers in production. This includes large enterprises such as Sony, IBM, Tyco, Align Technologies and more.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Albert Heijn, Bell, BMC, Samsung, WindStream, Johnson & Johnson

Buyer's Guide

Komodor vs. Rancher Labs

December 2024

Free Report: Komodor vs. Rancher Labs

Find out what your peers are saying about Komodor vs. Rancher Labs and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Komodor vs. Rancher Labs report.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.