Lacework FortiCNAPP vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security comparison

Fortinet and SentinelOne are both solutions in the Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) category. Fortinet is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.7, while SentinelOne is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. Fortinet holds a 2.8% mindshare in CNAP, compared to SentinelOne’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of SentinelOne users who would recommend it.

Lacework FortiCNAPP

Read 10 Lacework FortiCNAPP reviews

3,272 Views
2,196 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...

Read 99 SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security reviews

3,797 Views
969 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Lacework FortiCNAPP

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 12, 2024

Lacework FortiCNAPP and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security compete in the cloud security category. Based on feature comparison, SentinelOne seems to have the upper hand due to its fast threat detection and better visibility.

Features: Lacework FortiCNAPP is known for its ease of use, seamless integrations, and robust anomaly detection. It efficiently integrates with Slack to provide real-time alerts and offers comprehensive compliance management. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security stands out with its automated remediation, deep threat visibility, and swift data assessment, providing an effective immediate threat response.

Room for Improvement: Lacework FortiCNAPP could improve by adding advanced data governance features, better SIEM integration, and enhancing remediation capabilities. SentinelOne Cloud can reduce resource intensity, improve search functionality, and provide more stable updates. Both products could benefit from simplifying alerts and configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Lacework FortiCNAPP is mainly deployed in public cloud environments, and users appreciate its proactive support via Slack. SentinelOne operates on both public and hybrid clouds, offering robust customer service but could improve issue coordination. Lacework's support is noted for consistent immediacy and responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Priced reasonably within the market, Lacework FortiCNAPP is affordable, offering clear ROI by reducing manual monitoring costs. SentinelOne provides competitive pricing and flexible licensing, though comprehensive coverage can be expensive. Both solutions effectively lower the need for extensive manual monitoring, enhancing investment returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Lacework FortiCNAPP

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

16th

Ranking in Container Security

13th

Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)

12th

Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

15th

Ranking in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)

11th

Ranking in Compliance Management

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

6th

Ranking in Container Security

3rd

Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)

4th

Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

4th

Ranking in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)

3rd

Ranking in Compliance Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud and Data Center Security (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) category, the mindshare of Lacework FortiCNAPP is 2.8%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 2.7%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP)

Featured Reviews

Robert Croteau

Director of Enablement at Avesha

It provides a good overview of our security posture

The most valuable feature is Lacework's ability to distill all the security and audit logs. I recommend it to my customers. Normally, when I consult for other customers that are getting into the cloud, we use native security tools. It's more of a rule-based engine. They have to go in and put their policies in place. It's hard for them to implement that, especially if they don't have a real security team. The team's policymakers don't do anything. Lacework takes out all the noise and gives them bits of things that actually matter with the application after it learns the behavior.

Read full review

Andrew W

VP - Information Technology at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees

Tells us about vulnerabilities as well as their impact and helps to focus on real issues

Looking at all the different pieces, it has got everything we need. Some of the pieces we do not even use. For example, we do not have Kubernetes Security. We are not running any K8 clusters, so it is good for us. Overall, we find the solution to be fantastic. There can be additional education components. This may not be truly fair to them because of what the product is going for, but it would be great to see additional education for compliance. It is not a criticism of the tool per se, but anything to help non-development resources understand some of the complexities of the cloud is always appreciated. Any additional educational resources are always helpful for security teams, especially those without a development background.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For the most part, out-of-the-box, it tells you right away about the things you need to work on. I like the fact that it prioritizes alerts based on severity, so that you can focus your efforts on anything that would be critical/high first, moderate second, and work your way down, trying to continue to improve your security posture."

"The most valuable feature, from a compliance perspective, is the ability to use Lacework as a platform for multiple compliance standards. We have to meet multiple standards like PCI, SOC 2, CIS, and whatever else is out there. The ability to have reports generated, per security standard, is one of the best features for me."

"The compliance reports are definitely most valuable because they save time and are accurate. So, instead of relying on a human going through and checking or providing me with a report, I could just log into Lacework and see for myself."

"The most valuable feature is Lacework's ability to distill all the security and audit logs. I recommend it to my customers. Normally, when I consult for other customers that are getting into the cloud, we use native security tools. It's more of a rule-based engine."

"The best feature, in my opinion, is the ease of use."

"There are many valuable features that I use in my daily work. The first are alerts and the event dossier that it generates, based on the severity. That is very insightful and helps me to have a security cap in our infrastructure. The second thing I like is the agent-based vulnerability management, which is the most accurate information."

"The most valuable aspects are identifying vulnerabilities—things that are out there that we aren't aware of—as well as finding what path of access attackers could use, and being able to see open SSL or S3 buckets and the like."

"Lacework is helping a lot in reducing the noise of the alerts. Usually, whenever you have a tool in place, you have a lot of noise in terms of alerts, but the time for an engineer to look into those alerts is limited. Lacework is helping us to consolidate the information that we are getting from the agents and other sources. We are able to focus only on the things that matter, which is the most valuable thing for us. It saves time, and for investigations, we have the right context to take action."

More Lacework FortiCNAPP pros

"The user-friendliness is the most valuable feature."

"It has a user-friendly dashboard that I can access without any difficulty."

"The solution helped free other staff to work on other projects or other tasks. We basically just had to do a bunch of upfront configuring. With it, we do not have to spend as much time in the console."

"PingSafe's most valuable feature is its unified console."

"The remediation process is good."

"I did a lot of research before signing up and doing the demo. They have a good reputation as far as catching threats early on."

"Cloud Native Security's evidence-based reporting allows us to prioritize issues by understanding their impact, helping us resolve the most important problems first."

"We like the platform and its response time. We also like that its console is user-friendly as well as modern and sleek."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pros

Cons

"I would like to see a remote access assistance feature. And the threat-hunting platform could be better."

"Lacework has not reduced the number of alerts we get. We've actually had to add resources as a result of using it because the application requires a lot of people to understand it to get the value out of it properly."

"The biggest thing I would like to see improved is for them to pursue and obtain a FedRAMP moderate authorization... I don't believe they have any immediate plans to get FedRAMP moderate authorized, which is a bit of a challenge for us because we can only use Lacework in our commercial environment."

"Its integrations with third-party SIEMs can be better. That is one of the things that we discussed with them."

"There are a couple of the difficulties we encounter in the realm of cybersecurity, or security as a whole, that relate to potentially limited clarity. Having the capacity to perceive the configuration aspect and having the ability to contribute to it holds substantial advantages, in my view. It ranks high, primarily due to its role in guaranteeing compliance and the potential to uncover vulnerabilities, which could infiltrate the system and introduce potential risks. I had been exploring a specific feature that captured my interest. However, just yesterday, I participated in a product update session that announced the imminent arrival of this feature. The feature involves real-time alerting. This was something I had been anticipating, and it seems that this capability is now being integrated, possibly as part of threat intelligence. While anomaly events consistently and promptly appear in the console, certain alerts tend to experience delays before being displayed. Yet, with the recent product update, this issue is expected to be resolved. Currently, a comprehensive view of all policies is available within the console. However, I want a more tailored display of my compliance posture, focusing specifically on policies relevant to me. For instance, if I'm not subject to HIPAA regulations, I'd prefer not to see the HIPAA compliance details. It's worth noting that even with this request, there exists a filtering mechanism to control the type of compliance information visible. This flexibility provides a workaround to my preference, which is why it's challenging for me to definitively state my exact request."

"The solution lacks a cohesive data model, making extracting the necessary data from the platform challenging. It uses its own LQL query language, and each database across different layers and modules is structured differently, complicating correlation efforts. Consequently, I had to create extensive custom reports outside Lacework because their default dashboards didn't communicate risk metrics. They're addressing these issues by redesigning their tools, including introducing the dashboard, which is a step closer to actionable insights but still needs refinement."

"Visibility is lacking, and both compliance-related metrics and IAM security control could be improved."

"A feature that I have requested from them is the ability to sort alerts and policies based on a security framework. Right now, when you go into alerts, you have hundreds and hundreds of them that you have to manually pick. It would be useful to have categories for CIS Benchmark or SOC 2 and be able to display all the alerts and policies for one security framework."

More Lacework FortiCNAPP cons

"We don't get any notifications from PingSafe when the clusters are down."

"While it is good, I think the solution's console could be improved."

"It is not a criticism of the tool per se, but anything to help non-development resources understand some of the complexities of the cloud is always appreciated. Any additional educational resources are always helpful for security teams, especially those without a development background."

"We use PingSafe and also SentinelOne. If PingSafe integrated some of the endpoint security features of SentinelOne, it would be the perfect one-stop solution for everything. We wouldn't need to switch between the products. At my organization, I am responsible for endpoint security and vulnerability management. Integrating both functions into one application would be ideal because I could see all the alerts, heat maps, and reports in one console."

"I would like additional integrations."

"here is a bit of a learning curve. However, you only need two to three days to identify options and get accustomed."

"In addition to the console alerts, I would like PingSafe to also send email notifications."

"Cloud Native Security's reporting could be better. We are unable to see which images are impacted. Several thousand images have been deployed, so if we can see some application-specific information in the dashboard, we can directly send that report to the team that owns the application. We'd also like the option to download the report from the portal instead of waiting for the report to be sent to our email."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing fee was approximately $80,000 USD, per year."

"My smaller deployments cost around 200,000 a year, which is probably not as expensive as Wiz."

"It is slightly expensive. It depends on how big your environment is, but it is expensive. Right now, we are spending a lot of money. We have covered all of the cloud providers and most of our colocation facilities as well, so we cannot complain, but it is slightly expensive. It is not super expensive."

"The pricing has gotten better. That scenario was somewhat unstable. They have a rather interesting licensing structure. I believe you get 200 resources per "Lacework unit." It was difficult, in the beginning, to figure out exactly what a "resource" was... That was a problem until about a year or so ago. They have improved it and it has stabilized quite a bit."

"It is a little expensive. I would rate it a four out of ten for pricing."

"The tool is cost-effective."

"Its pricing is constant. It has been constant over the previous year, so I am happy with it. However, price distribution can be better explained. That is the only area I am worried about. Otherwise, the pricing is very reasonable."

"PingSafe's primary advantage is its ability to consolidate multiple tools into a single user interface, but, beyond this convenience, it may not offer significant additional benefits to justify its price."

"It is cheap."

"Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne is cost-efficient."

"PingSafe is cost-effective for the amount of infrastructure we have. It's reasonable for what they offer compared to our previous solution. It's at least 25 percent to 30 percent less."

"The licensing is easy to understand and implement, with some flexibility to accommodate dynamic environments."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Lacework?

Polygraph compliance is a valuable feature. In our perspective, it delivers significant benefits. The clarity it offers, along with the ability to identify and address misconfigurations, is invalua...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lacework?

My smaller deployments cost around 200,000 a year, which is probably not as expensive as Wiz.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lacework?

The solution lacks a cohesive data model, making extracting the necessary data from the platform challenging. It uses its own LQL query language, and each database across different layers and modul...

See all answers

What do you like most about PingSafe?

The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best features.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?

The pricing is somewhat high compared to other market tools. This cost can be particularly prohibitive for small businesses and startups.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingSafe?

To enhance the notification system's efficiency, resolved issues should be promptly removed from the portal. Currently, these issues take two to three hours to be removed, creating unnecessary clut...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs Lacework FortiCNAPP

Compared 29% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Lacework FortiCNAPP

Compared 14% of the time

AWS GuardDuty vs Lacework FortiCNAPP

Compared 9% of the time

Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs Lacework FortiCNAPP

Compared 5% of the time

Tenable Cloud Security vs Lacework FortiCNAPP

Compared 2% of the time

More Lacework FortiCNAPP Competitors

Wiz vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 31% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 23% of the time

AWS GuardDuty vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 8% of the time

Orca Security vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 6% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 2% of the time

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Lacework FortiCNAPP

December 2024

Download Lacework FortiCNAPP product report

Buyer's Guide

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

October 2024

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report

Download SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security product report

Also Known As

Polygraph, FortiCNP

PingSafe

Learn More

Fortinet

SentinelOne

Overview

Lacework FortiCNAPP provides robust cloud security, combining vulnerability management and multi-cloud insight with user-friendly controls, machine learning detection, and compliance support.

Lacework FortiCNAPP specializes in cloud security by merging machine learning anomaly detection with agent-based vulnerability management to offer detailed alerts and compliance reports. Its comprehensive approach allows continuous monitoring across AWS and Kubernetes, providing insights from an attacker's perspective. The platform offers automation and seamless Slack integration, facilitating collaborative and efficient cloud security management. Users value its ability to handle multi-cloud environments and scan IAC scripts, configurations, and compute nodes across AWS and GCP.

What are the key features?

Machine Learning Detection: Identifies anomalies effectively.
Compliance Reports: Provides precise compliance documentation.
Vulnerability Management: Supports agent-based vulnerability assessments.
Multi-Cloud Support: Manages and secures across multiple cloud providers.
Automation and Collaboration: Enables integration with Slack for streamlined communication.
Custom Alerts: Allows creation of personalized alerts for better focus.

What benefits do users expect?

Reduced Alert Noise: Minimizes distractions with filtered alerts.
Efficient Cloud Security: Automates processes for enhanced security management.
Collaboration Support: Integrates with tools like Slack.
Insightful Perspective: Provides insight from an attacker's viewpoint.

Organizations across sectors leverage Lacework FortiCNAPP for cloud security, focusing on compliance, security posture, and vulnerability management. It is widely used for monitoring AWS and Kubernetes environments, scanning IAC scripts, configurations, and securing compute nodes. It supports multi-cloud security posture management and log ingestion, enabling companies to maintain strong cloud infrastructures without dedicated security layers.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security protects cloud workloads, offering advanced threat detection and automated response. It integrates seamlessly with cloud environments and secures containerized applications and virtual machines against vulnerabilities.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is renowned for its efficiency in mitigating threats in real-time. The platform integrates effortlessly with existing cloud environments, ensuring robust cloud security management with minimal manual intervention. Securing containerized applications and virtual machines, it excels in threat intelligence and endpoint protection. However, improvements are needed in performance during high workload periods, and more integrations with third-party tools and better documentation would be beneficial. Users often find the installation process complex, support response times slow, and the dashboard's navigation unintuitive.

What are the key features of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?

Real-time Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats as they occur.
Automated Response: Automatically responds to threats to minimize impact.
Ease of Deployment: Simple setup process with scalable options.
Machine Learning Insights: AI-driven insights enhance threat prevention.
Seamless Integration: Integrates with cloud environments for unified security management.

What are the primary benefits or ROI to expect from SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?

Enhanced Threat Mitigation: Improved security against real-time threats.
Reduced Manual Intervention: Automated processes save time and resources.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing security requirements.
Centralized Management: Manage security across platforms from a single console.
Advanced Threat Intelligence: Provides in-depth analysis and protection.

In specific industries, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is implemented to safeguard critical data and infrastructure. Organizations in finance, healthcare, and technology depend on its real-time threat detection and automated response to protect sensitive information. Its ability to secure containerized applications and virtual machines is particularly valuable in dynamic environments where rapid scaling is necessary.

Sample Customers

J.Crew, AdRoll, Snowflake, VMWare, Iterable, Pure Storage, TrueCar, NerdWallet, and more.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

December 2024

Free Report: Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Lacework FortiCNAPP vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report.

See our list of best Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) vendors, best Vulnerability Management vendors, and best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.