Lightbits vs Red Hat Ceph Storage comparison

Lightbits and Red Hat are both solutions in the Software Defined Storage (SDS) category. Lightbits is ranked #25, while Red Hat is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. Lightbits holds a 0.4% mindshare in SDS, compared to Red Hat’s 19.5% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution.

Lightbits

166 Views
95 Comparison Views

Red Hat Ceph Storage

Read 22 Red Hat Ceph Storage reviews

3,660 Views
3,124 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Lightbits

Red Hat Ceph Storage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Lightbits and Red Hat Ceph Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Red Hat, Nutanix and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS).

To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined Storage (SDS) Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Software Defined Storage (SDS)

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,763 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Lightbits

Ranking in Software Defined Storage (SDS)

25th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Ceph Storage

Ranking in Software Defined Storage (SDS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File and Object Storage (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Software Defined Storage (SDS) category, the mindshare of Lightbits is 0.4%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ceph Storage is 19.5%, down from 20.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Defined Storage (SDS)

Featured Reviews

Use Lightbits?

Share your opinion

Soner BÜYÜKATALAY

Chief Software Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Nov 9, 2023

Provides efficient stability and archive storage features, but its maintenance process needs improvement

We use the product for archive storage, video surveillance systems, and media storage Red Hat Ceph Storage is difficult to maintain. We use CLI tools for maintenance, and the concept seems challenging. Additionally, it is difficult to expand the product due to balancing errors. It takes some time…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The operational overhead is higher compared to Azure because we own the hardware."

"Most of time, you can get Ceph with the OpenStack solution in a subscription as a bundle."

"The price of Red Hat Ceph Storage is reasonable."

"The other big advantage is that Ceph is free software. Compared to traditional SAN based storage, it is very economical."

"There is no cost for software."

"We never used the paid support."

"The price of this product isn't high."

"If you can afford a product like Red Hat Ceph Storage then go for it. If you cannot, then you need to test Ceph and get your hands dirty."

More Red Hat Ceph Storage pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Red Hat Ceph Storage compare with MiniO?

Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, ea...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat Ceph Storage?

The high availability of the solution is important to us.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Ceph Storage?

Some documentation is very hard to find. The documentation must be quickly available.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

MinIO vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Compared 47% of the time

VMware vSAN vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Compared 7% of the time

NetApp StorageGRID vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Compared 4% of the time

Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Compared 3% of the time

Dell PowerFlex vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Compared 3% of the time

More Red Hat Ceph Storage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Software Defined Storage (SDS)

November 2024

Download Lightbits product report

Buyer's Guide

Software Defined Storage (SDS)

November 2024

Download Red Hat Ceph Storage product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ceph

Learn More

Lightbits

Red Hat

Overview

Lightbits delivers scale-out, disaggregated, software-defined storage that performance like local flash.

Red Hat Ceph Storage is an enterprise open source platform that provides unified software-defined storage on standard, economical servers and disks. With block, object, and file storage combined into one platform, Red Hat Ceph Storage efficiently and automatically manages all your data.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Dell, DreamHost

Buyer's Guide

Software Defined Storage (SDS)

November 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Red Hat, Nutanix and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.

We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.