LinkSprinter vs Wireshark comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
NetAlly Logo
939 views|342 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Wireshark Logo
993 views|573 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LinkSprinter and Wireshark based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Network Troubleshooting solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed LinkSprinter vs. Wireshark Report (Updated: March 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution provides switch port and VLAN information.""The tool fits in your pocket, so it's easy to carry and you don't have to have a big bag of tools."

More LinkSprinter Pros →

"The feature to incorporate Voice over IP (VoIP) incidents into network traffic analysis is valuable. Capturing voice or SIP communication allows for examination of interactions between SIP clients and SIP servers. This helps the team investigate or analyze issues related to call center servers and operators.""The session-level filtering features are valuable.""Being able to dissect email data and figure out what is inside email messages was the most valuable feature. Such a feature is pretty helpful for an ongoing forensic investigation or when there is a potential insider threat that you are trying to investigate. It allows you to see the network activity of the users you are investigating. It also gives you more visibility into your network. It was very easy to set up. There is a lot of information out there on Google and YouTube about how to use it. There is also community support. If you have any trouble, it is pretty easy to find an answer online. You will have to do some digging only if you have a very specific use case.""The GUI is easy to use.""It has a good syntax to put the commands in and get information out of.""The most valuable feature is the traffic gate, which shows which IPs are getting more bandwidth or traffic.""It has good basic features.""Wireshark has a lot of features. It's a powerful tool if you're familiar with it. You can see everything on the network with it."

More Wireshark Pros →

Cons
"The solution should improve cable testing.""They could make it easier to set up originally, because the initial setup can be quite hit and miss."

More LinkSprinter Cons →

"This product needs to improve the UI.""It needs the ability to follow multiple interfaces for specific traffic from different network zones/virtual networks. It would help to understand how any packet is going through the network.""Big trace files (more than 1,000,000 packets) can be slow, but then you can use "TraceWrangler" (also free) to help with slicing and dicing the data.""The average person would probably find Wireshark hard to use. When I first installed it, I was overwhelmed by all the data it was shooting out. It doesn't make sense until you start doing some research and figure out what everything means. It isn't the most user-friendly tool. It just provides so much information.""Wireshark is similar to an OS defense tool, meaning that it runs on an OS such as Ubuntu and Fedora, but I'm unsure if it's compatible with Windows or if it's a straightforward process to run it on Windows. Right now, my team needs to run Wireshark from a dongle to use it, so it's an OS-dependable tool, and that's an area for improvement. I was unable to use Wireshark on Windows, and I couldn't capture it, as I'm unsure how to configure the wireless card into monitoring mode on Windows. The process was straightforward on Linux, but it wasn't the case on Windows OS. It seems Wireshark isn't compatible with all OS. For example, you can analyze the log, and you can analyze it on the Windows server, but you can't do a capture in Windows. Configuring Wireshark for Windows isn't as easy as configuring it for Linux.""DNS could be improved.""We'd like to be able to extract the output into an Excel table.""The solution has a steep learning curve. There are so many filters and features that are frequently being updated, it takes research, experience and familiarity to be able to use them. It could be a lot more user-friendly."

More Wireshark Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product is a little bit overpriced."
  • "You pay for the device, but you don't have to pay for the app."
  • More LinkSprinter Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's a stand-alone tool. If there is a commercial license for it I am unaware of it."
  • "It is free to download and install. It runs on multiple platforms, so how can you go wrong?"
  • "It's free."
  • "This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."
  • "It is free."
  • "Wireshark is free software, so you don't have to pay any licensing fee. Individual people can use it and then donate to Wireshark."
  • "Wireshark is free software, so you can download it and use it for free with no licensing fees."
  • "I am using the free version of this solution."
  • More Wireshark Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Troubleshooting solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution provides switch port and VLAN information.
    Top Answer:The product is a little bit overpriced. It probably needs to be 10 to 20 percent cheaper.
    Top Answer:The solution should improve cable testing.
    Top Answer:I wish the filters were a little bit more prepopulated. It would have been easy to hit a drop-down and select a filter. If I only wanted to look at DCP, UDP, or IP, it would be easy to filter it out… more »
    Ranking
    7th
    Views
    939
    Comparisons
    342
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    372
    Rating
    8.0
    4th
    Views
    993
    Comparisons
    573
    Reviews
    28
    Average Words per Review
    465
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Zabbix logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Nagios XI logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Colasoft Capsa logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    SolarWinds NPM logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Dynatrace logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Learn More
    Wireshark
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    The LinkSprinter Pocket Network Tester verifies the functionality of copper Ethernet links and identifies errors in less than 10 seconds. The tester reveals network connectivity status and port information while ensuring documentation for every link. The comprehensive AutoTester measures PoE voltage, performs a switch test, and confirms the DHCP server is running and responsive. The tester also verifies gateway/router, internal IP service, and cloud reachability. When paired with the secure Link-Live Cloud Service, the Network Tester automatically uploads results and allows annotation of results enabling job supervisors to easily manage the progress of deployment and troubleshooting tasks assigned to their team.

    Wireshark is the world's foremost network protocol analyzer.
    Sample Customers
    Cisco, Marriott, Sands Expo, Valparaiso University, Memorial Hermann Health Care System, Mount Sinai, Cox Enterprises, George Washington University, University of Iowa.
    Comversion, ADP, Talbots
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Healthcare Company15%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Government9%
    University8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    University10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    University11%
    Educational Organization11%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise54%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    LinkSprinter vs. Wireshark
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about LinkSprinter vs. Wireshark and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    LinkSprinter is ranked 7th in Network Troubleshooting with 3 reviews while Wireshark is ranked 4th in Network Troubleshooting with 61 reviews. LinkSprinter is rated 9.0, while Wireshark is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of LinkSprinter writes "A small, convenient tool that is very stable, but needs to have a longer battery life". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wireshark writes "User-friendly with an easy setup and a nice interface". LinkSprinter is most compared with LinkRunner and NetAlly EtherScope nXG, whereas Wireshark is most compared with Zabbix, Nagios XI, Colasoft Capsa, SolarWinds NPM and Dynatrace. See our LinkSprinter vs. Wireshark report.

    See our list of best Network Troubleshooting vendors.

    We monitor all Network Troubleshooting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.