Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

LogicManager vs Workiva Wdesk comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

LogicManager
Ranking in GRC
30th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Data Privacy Management Software (15th)
Workiva Wdesk
Ranking in GRC
5th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Business Performance Management (11th), Financial Close Software (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the GRC category, the mindshare of LogicManager is 0.6%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Workiva Wdesk is 7.8%, up from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
GRC
 

Featured Reviews

DmitryKerov - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 22, 2022
Out of the box and ready to go with excellent support available
Our primary use case is for application performance monitoring and log aggregation. We are customers of LocigManager and I'm a software engineer.  LogicMonitor offers great support, they helped us a lot and responded very quickly. It's out of the box so once we deployed it was ready to go without…
Phillip Gough - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 24, 2023
The solution is easy to deploy and enables collaboration, but it must improve its speed and enable users to create pivot tables
The solution is used for financial reporting The collaboration within the platform is valuable. The solution should be able to do pivot tables. I have been using the solution for three years. I am using the latest version of the solution. I rate the tool’s stability a six out of ten. The speed…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Out of the box solution that doesn't require any special setup."
"The cross-functionality between connectivity, whether through API connections between different software platforms or the connection of data collection to the actual written ESG report, is highly valuable. The connectivity of all these aspects significantly aids in data assurance, which I consider a bonus."
"The collaboration within the platform is valuable."
"It makes the compliance process more efficient and more effective."
"It helps you to maintain a backup of your data, including the connectivity with the tables, which provides a user-friendly way to handle and access your files."
"Workiva Wdesk has a flow diagram that is standardized, making it easy for people to file documents on ECDAs, which are in HTML format."
"Workiva Wdesk is pretty good in terms of getting the data from the system, automating the reporting schedules...It has a very good integration with ERP tools."
"The most valuable feature is its ability to easily upload and update financial results, creating a dynamic data sheet."
 

Cons

"A little too expensive."
"The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandatory or voluntary reporting requirements, leading to lost linkage connections that must be manually reset each time a change is made. This aspect is not functional now, and I see it as an opportunity for improvement."
"The speed must be improved."
"Regarding the solution, reporting has certain areas that can be considered for improvement."
"The most critical issue is the need to shift between uppercase and lowercase."
"At this point, I don't see a compelling reason to invest in Workiva. It may be necessary for compliance and controlling the version of SCC, but not everyone needs its high-end capabilities."
"With this product, it's more about the integrated data model where you can have a one-to-many/many-to-one relationship between your policies and processes, risks, and controls. They need to showcase how you can put those pieces together."
"One area where Workiva Wdesk could improve is by ensuring that its cloud-based system is fully compatible with the most current versions of PowerPoint and Excel."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Our clients in Asia think that the solution is too expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
68%
Government
5%
Computer Software Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Educational Organization
16%
Computer Software Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Workiva Wdesk?
The most valuable feature is its ability to easily upload and update financial results, creating a dynamic data sheet.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workiva Wdesk?
Wdesk is affordable and as far as I'm aware, there were no additional costs beyond the standard license increase. We didn't have to make any other changes; it primarily involved accessing the platf...
What needs improvement with Workiva Wdesk?
The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandat...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Wdesk
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

First Marblehead Corporation, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Hawaii, University Hospitals, Corporate One FCU, Casella Waste Systems, Bank of Stockton, Vina Capital Group, C1 Bank, DentaQuest
Noodles Company, eBay, Winnebago, American Assets Trust, AmericanEnterprise, Calpian, Capstone Infrastructure, Cascades, Circor International, Coeur Mining, Davey, Dr Pepper Snapple
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, AuditBoard and others in GRC. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.